Society got caught off guard when woke arguments were novel. We just weren’t ready for a group to claim everything from washing machines to roads to black on black crime is racist. After a few years we’re used to it and it doesn’t work as well. But it worked so well that the wokes never developed other arguments. Now they don’t know what to do.
He probably thinks being openly Catholic would be “divisive”
This generation coming up, that’s fighting back: Is this just the younger siblings of all the high school/college age kids who all suddenly became “non-binary” one day?
Ten year ago I used to say things like “men and non-men” just as a joke. Figures the fag brigade would do it seriously.
The way the media abuses language for inclusion, I have no fucking clue anymore.
Shocked_Shocked_NotThatShocked.png
Hey be fair, fags and trannies (but especially trannies) have a high prevalence of autism and one of the issues autists have is discomfort with eye contact. Another weakness is asking them to do any work whatsoever, since trannydom and leftism go hand in hand.
It sure was a good strategy decision on their part to convince people that this isn’t a debate but rather one side is “on the right side of history” fighting for liberty and justice and whatever, while the other is hatred and oppression and evil. It worked well for a really long time. It convinced like a third of the cohort now in college and high school that they must be gay or non-binary or trans or dragonkin or SOMETHING other than normal.
Looks like the cohort coming up behind that cohort has other ideas though. Between this and the Muslim kids stomping the rainbow flags, I think we might be moving somewhat back toward “debate” rather than “good vs evil”
It always makes me laugh when lefties lament how horribly “divided” the country is. Then they get up on stage during a televised award show, drop their pants and shit on half of the country (only figuratively so far). There’s definitely room in modern leftist politics for that meme of the guy shooting the other and then asking why he would do this.
We’ve all met leftists in real life though. Maybe 5% of the people taking a shit on this boy, from the safe distance of the Internet, would do so in real life. The other 95% are either be too much of a pussy or too mentally disordered and socially inept, to say the same things to his face, and yes I do mean his face referring to a young boy. God forbid one of his parents showed up when the other, braver 5% came around to gloat in person.
You know, if I want a different experience with a game, show, movie, etc than the one offered, I just go play/watch a different one.
I wish I’d realized earlier that I should have been demanding the makers of the one in front of me change everything around so it aligns with what I want.
Well, see, your opinion is invalidated because you are related to one or more women. Although I am too, so I think that invalidates the invalidation. So maybe your opinion is good again. Unless you’re a woman.
No, you fool, surely you know the way to make your boycott or strike effective is to… um… say in advance when you’ll come back, regardless of whether the target accedes to your demands…?
I don’t mean the original context was funny, but rather subsequent snarky uses of it.
Holy shit that site still exists! I thought it was the shit when I was 14. Then I read an “experience” where a bunch of woman shoved acid up their asses and vaginas and I thought, you know, maybe these people aren’t the ones I should look up to…
Love it lololol.
Edit: By the way, doesn’t the pedo have an oddly modern look? If you watch the video or any story about it, everyone else looks straight out of casting for the 1980s (as you’d expect) but the pedo would fit in with any group of young leftists today. Well, never mind, I guess that isn’t as remarkable as I first thought.
Where's Gay Pete at?
He’ll be along shortly. He is currently in one apse of his cathedral-brain working out how to blame the explosion on white supremacy.
That will never, ever stop being funny. It should also never stop being referenced, just because sometimes leftists think they are completely getting away with their little language abuses.
“A possible World War 3” lolololol. And yet that’s only the second-dumbest thing on the list. Y2K was a joke we all laughed at. At least the other things did in fact occur, I’ll give this fool that much. The trouble they caused you was largely up to you though.
It’s also rooted in racism!
Er, or whatever
“there’s nothing wrong with sexy women promoting video games - the problem is how”
No, we know damn well you’d complain no matter “how” it was done. This is just a standard critical-theory trick. “It’s okay if you just do X.” Okay, X. “No, that wasn’t X!”
(Alternatively, “it’s okay if you do X.” Okay, X. “No, actually now we expect X+”)
How much of the caption is not in evidence Based on the picture? Never mind “this is the Republican Party” but the actual statements of present fact. I don’t even count one dozen people. I can’t really make out DeSantis’s face. I don’t see “nigger.” I guess “butt fucker” could hint at a “homophobic slur” but it is a little way down the list, and certainly someone who flies a Swastika in public would not be afraid to say “faggot.” I can confirm there is a Swastika or three present.
So, at best 1.5 true statements of fact out of five tested? And the thing is, they could all be true if you went there in person, but it’s important to not let media figures just tell you what’s going on without having to prove it. Modern news is full to the brim with assertions and assumptions and the general hope that you’ll just take their word for everything. Insist that they prove whatever they say.
Edit: I went and looked up the poster and she’s not media per se, but an activist, but the above still applies to any interested party. Also, conveniently, she blocked comments at some point. How very, very convenient. I wasn’t there, so I don’t know if this is completely fake from start to finish (i.e. hired leftists LARPing to provide fodder for Twitter) or if these goofballs are “legit” and Shannon Watts is just taking advantage by asserting that half the country is represented by these guys. Either way, it’s important to note that she isn’t letting people ask questions about it under the post. Why would that be?
They never expected anyone to hit their brakes at an intersection.
Hell, suddenly the left loves the Department of Defense?!?
Boy is THAT the truth! I think you can tell a lot about peoples’ inner psyche based on what insults are effective. When we call them racist they barely even notice because they “know” that “ackshually racism is PrEjUdIcE pLuS pOwEr.” They are not afraid of being called racist because they “know” they aren’t. (For which read, they are convinced they’re not.) But by contrast, “groomer” sets them in a rage to the point they have to get it banned from any outlet they control. I wonder why!