I think they're hoping to send them to a meat grinder of war so they can wipe their hands of any wrong doing. Failing that, having them as work mules so they can engage in wealth transfer from them to the rest of society. For the Government, preferably behind bars and without a wage.
Someone went viral for suggesting that the twin brother should have been the one taken instead because he was the "ugly one" and they "should have kept the hot one".
When you think individuals couldn't sink any lower...
As well as the fact that DNA material can be preserved which will greatly increase the chance of a successful prosecution (in a fair and just legal system based on innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt). Otherwise it becomes an he said, she said situation.
Sounds like something that needs to be submitted to Louis Rossmann's Consumer Action Taskforce if this is the attitude being presented to someone who lost their home.
Let them learn about the Streisand Effect the hard way.
The Government's ultimate goal is to know where you are and what you are doing at any given moment of the day. Expect this to roll out to every single CCTV point and sold to every individual who has a camera on the private house pointing to the road. Maybe the Government will even give them tax breaks or financial incentives for being a "good citizen" by doing their dirty work for them.
From July if Ofcom gets its way, there will be facial recognition at some point for every device that connects to the Internet as it will be mandated to use the Internet. That data along with your location information will be stored on databases that can be accessed by the Police at any time.
Or for someone to show something to someone outside of the group. There was a Grenfell bonfire video that was shared in a private group that someone showed to someone else and then it spread and went viral. Don't assume that anything in a private group will stay private because there are individuals who do not keep things private.
Its not the conclusion that is important (they were released without charge after all), its the process. It sends a chilling warning to anyone else who wants to criticise the school and authority that they will face the full wrath of the police, their respect and social proof destroyed and your life turned upside down as the Internet is forever and employers now doing research on you online when considering candidates.
Meanwhile shoplifters can walk out of shops with their bounty without fear or consequence.
By equality, he means supremacy.
If left wing Governments get their way, there will be three tiers in society in future, top tier attractive men who will sleep with all the women, the women who will bear their children and men who will be brainwashed by the state to be gay feminists to "protect women and girls" and pay for the other two tiers via taxes or locked up if they refuse to comply.
The recent campaigns to feminise "low mate value" men have convinced me that this is the route they're taking.
They're going to "protect women and girls" by going after a certain demographic. Not those involved in the grooming gangs but the demographic mentioned on Adolescence and what made up the likes of Jake Davison, Axel Rudakubana and yesterday, Nasen Saadi. Men with autism, men who are asocial, men who are unattractive, men who have no luck on the dating apps, men who detest what society has become, men who engage with the "manosphere", men who are deemed "low mate value" quoting William Costello of Incel study fame and men who are rejected by women.
Watch as they ban the turtles too as they get considered as bad as threat as that meanie ANDREW TATE and his band of evil INCELS!
Despite the reality that we didn't have hordes of gang members walking around with swords after watching the turtles on TV. It's as if people can tell the difference between reality and fiction.
That's what they ultimately want. They'll sell it to the public as fighting CSAM, abolishing hate speech, levelling the playing field for UK business (while still allowing Internet access for corporations) and other factors.
I think the UK Government genuinely believes that a free and open Internet as well as encryption was a grave mistake that needs to be reversed.
And what better way to do attain more power than to make the aforementioned groups of men an outgroup that the Government will use as an excuse to give themselves more powers "to protect the safety of women and girls".