That doesn't surprise me at all...want a white one? PIck her. Black? Pick Lizzo. Asian? Awkwafina.
The same shitty actress packaged in different colors.
InBev is a piece of shit. They buy up craft beers that are successful and destroy them instead of adding it to their portfolio simply because they don't want the competition.
The $5 million is because of 'defamation' and has nothing to do with rape or sexual assault.
They are just lying.
She's overweight, can't act, and refuses to stick to slapstick comedies like that other fat lady comedian who has thankfully dropped off the Earth, Melissa something.
I think she just replaced Melissa whoever because she's younger and asian. She can't do action for shit, she can barely do comedy.
"I won't give you any cash but I support you asking for it."
Basically the ultimate Democrat politician right here. Don't forget he is a legitimate anti-vaxxer too, his daughter apparently hasn't gotten any shots.
All while he forced other children her age to be forcibly vaccinated with experimental shots to attend school.
He truly is the biggest piece of shit in American politics.
On what grounds would a non-compete be broken?
If he isn't getting paid by Twitter, which is a social media site legally, technically he can share his own opinions about events.
If Twitter puts him under a paid contract that would be a different story, FOX might be able to claim breach of contract.
This is actually kind of genius. They refused to release him from his contract so he is simply going to use social media to share his thoughts, which doesn't violate the noncompete clause in his contract.
They are essentially bankrolling his own Twitter show which will gain far, far more viewers than FOX. I wonder if they'll try to litigate and declare Twitter a 'news venue' even though they don't employ Tucker or pay him.
This is a pretty funky way to fuck over FOX, I'm all for it.
“There are so many things hurting and really killing our kids and we all know what I’m talking about right now and it ain’t no drag queen — because if you’ve ever seen a drag queen lip sync for her life, it only makes you happier, it only make you love more, it makes you a better person,” she declared.
Charlize Theron: Groomer.
The four-hour livestream event was designed to be a celebration of all things drag and reportedly delivered more than $500,000 from 5,000 individual donors.
Legal money laundering.
Organisers said “the recent demonization of drag culture has been greatly upsetting and completely shocking” which is why they wanted to step out of the shadows and show the world their gender orientation.
Ah yes, "the shadows".
Depends what reasons they gave. If they cited the conduct policy in their dismissal he'd have a case since he wasn't involved and they didn't wait until the facts were out. Could be wrongful termination.
The problem is that would kill his NFL career or what is left of it, he could return now although he'd get paid minimum.
I hope he sues the fuck out of the Bills for cutting him. Take their asses to court and make them pay publicly.
"Platform responsibility" from journalists?
That's a good joke.
Yes, I realize there is a typo in the title.
The new rules require journalists to submit a letter to gain access to the White House grounds with information about their employment, mandating that reporters work for “an organization whose principal business is news dissemination.”
All current “hard passes,” which are used to gain access to the White House grounds and press briefings, will expire July 31.
The letter requires reporters to submit their physical address, a statement saying they have accessed the White House in the last six months and cover the White House “on a regular basis,” as well as proof of “accreditation by a press gallery in either the Supreme Court, U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives.”
Reporters will also have to state they have the willingness “to submit to any necessary investigation by the U.S. Secret Service to determine eligibility for access to the White House complex, where Secret Service will determine eligibility based on whether the applicant presents a potential risk to the safety or security of the President, the Vice President, or the White House complex.”
The guidelines include a provision stating that journalists who have access to the White House maintain a “professional manner,” and not impede “events or briefings” on campus. Violators face the possibility of suspension.
“The White House expects that all hard pass holders will act in a professional manner while on White House grounds by respecting their colleagues, White House employees, and guests; observing stated restrictions on access to areas of the White House or credentialed events; and not impeding events or briefings on campus. Absent security concerns involving the United States Secret Service or other exigent circumstances, the White House will provide a written warning to you if your conduct violates these expectations. Subsequent violations may lead to the suspension or revocation of your hard pass, following notice and an opportunity to respond,” the guidance states.
“While I don’t feel upset that the White House is making changes due to my presence, it is ironic that these modifications come shortly after President Biden declared that journalism is not a crime on World Press Freedom Day. It appears that if you excel at your job, both the WHCA and the White House may work together to target you. This situation exacerbates the public’s lack of trust in the media and politicians in Washington,” Ateba told the Daily Caller.
“As we return to these prior criteria, which help ensure hard passes are in the hands of reporters who need regular access to campus as part of their duties, we are providing a nearly 3-month window for reporters to turn in their applications and reach out with any questions. The criteria will apply evenly to everyone,” the official said, according to the Post.
I wouldn't get too excited over this, Tucker hired a pretty well known attorney to handle his divorce from the FOX contract, this guy has enough connections to plant stories to push public interest.
What you are seeing here is just posturing so they revoke the non-compete clause. He'll keep planting stories like this in the right wing media and they are hoping that between the loss in viewers and public outcry FOX caves to make it stop and remove the non compete.
I had to post this just to highlight what might be my favorite public statement made in 2023.
But the most pronounced attack on Bud Light from the left came from the Advocate, a pro-LGBT outlet, and contributor John Casey called for yet another boycott of the beleaguered brand.
“Anheuser-Busch, weakly, did not stand up against hate. And while boycotts don’t work, they do make a statement. It’s not Kid Rock and Ted Nugent who should be boycotting Bud Light — it should be us,” Casey wrote in mid-April.
"Boycotts don't work, despite all evidence to the contrary in this case, but we're going to boycott!"
John Casey, you hit a new low.
The FDA and Pfizer, two groups I will never trust again in my lifetime.
Recently, one operation in Ottaway County was raided and authorities seized over 26,000 plants and 900 pounds of processed marijuana, with an estimated street value of $24 million.
Was this estimator high as balls when he came up with that number?
The Lego Dreamzzz line, produced by the toy giant, will debut with several new models, including a Pegasus horse, a bunny with blue and pink stripes named Bunchu, and a “nightmare shark ship.”
The new ‘gender inclusive’ characters will also be featured in a new television show premiering on May 15.
I guarantee whoever came up with that name is a pedophile. Guarantee it.
losing 25% or more of those sales will absolutely wreck everybody in the beer distribution system.
There absolutely would be people affected, however the delivery drivers and bar owners are not impacted the slightest bit.
When a bar says "I don't want to carry bud light" the InBev distributor just says "alright pick another product and we'll replace it". The delivery driver doesn't give a shit what products he's carrying, just that his reefer is full. The bar doesn't give a shit what products he's carrying, just that his bar is full.
The only people who get hurt are the distributors who now have tons of inventory they can't move from one line, but InBev probably replaced 50 - 70% of bud light lines with another product they carry so it isn't a big deal for them.
This is being led by Letitia James and an equally big asshole from California.
We do not want this to succeed.
Jackie Chan, who is not American, was the next most popular answer for the third year in a row (12%). Bruce Lee, who died 50 years ago, was the second most popular choice (6%) and Vice President Kamala Harris was the third (5%).
Funny my first thought when I read this was "who doesn't know Jackie Chan?"
“We need to clarify the facts that this was one can, one influencer, one post and not a campaign,” Michel Doukeris told investors during an earnings call.
"Hey guys we never made it FORMAL, just paid them to represent our product."
Doukeris went on to decry the “misinformation” spread on social media after Mulvaney last month posted a photo with a Bud Light while in a bathtub on TikTok to her more than 10 million followers.
Oh, it is always misinformation isn't it. That damned social media misinformation.
Doukeris said the company was “providing direct financial support” to delivery drivers, wholesalers, and bar owners who were impacted by the backlash.
Why the fuck are the drivers responsible for bud light sales? Is InBev getting fucked across their entire portfolio? That would be brilliant, but the idea that drivers and bar owners are impacted is absurd. They just replace the lines they lose in bars, likely with competitor products.
“We will continue to learn, meet the moment in time, all be stronger and we work tirelessly to do what we do best: Bring people together over a beer and creating a future of more cheers,” Doukeris told Fox Business.
Lame PR requirement to his statement.
Overall 1/10 statement, way too late, not enough promises of repercussions for the people involved and 0 consequences.
Who the fuck is giving these guys advice, some woke PR company? Because holy shit they are just as incompetent.
Wait, Sweden has excess deaths because of COVID? The same COVID that stopped killing people a while ago while excess deaths continue to CLIMB instead of decrease?
Please explain that one to me. COVID killed off some old people then did nothing, the shots are what is continuing this trend.
This is a fallacy that is being spread to essentially forgive the pharmaceutical industry.
Lockdowns are the primary cause of economies dying, not people dying. People are dying from mRNA shots. That is why a country like Sweden still has excess deaths despite no lockdowns.
The facts are literally right in front of you.
This is true however this guy and LOTS of other people are going to start saying that lockdowns are causing the excess deaths.
Lockdowns caused countries economies to sink, they ARE MINIMIMALLY AFFECTING DEATHS.
The Deaths come from the mRNA shot, not the lockdowns. Don't let them weasel their way out of this with an excuse.
It will be overturned on appeal pretty quickly, this is really embarrassing that not only was this lawsuit even allowed (they had to pass new legislation in the state of NY just to allow this suit to move forwards) but that the outcome is so badly mischaracterized.
Benny is accurate that the jury should not have rewarded any damages at all considering the lack of evidence.