7
Steampunk_Moustache 7 points ago +7 / -0

13/50 is murder.

The 10/60 cited here is all violent crime, even the mere threat of it.

Regardless, the disproportionality of it is indeed staggering.

11
Steampunk_Moustache 11 points ago +11 / -0

We all know why this is, but there's literally no way to say it without being labelled a white supremacist.

45
Steampunk_Moustache 45 points ago +45 / -0

Reality is a radicalization front for white 'supremacists'.

Also, I can't remember the last time I saw a video of an Asian person 'doing something negative' that wasn't recorded in China, which is a little fucking different.

21
Steampunk_Moustache 21 points ago +23 / -2

I bet women will STILL be voting majority Democrat

Of course they will.

Do you think women (as a whole) actually care about women's sports at all? It's not like they watch it, is it? The only reason women's sports even exists is because of female envy of male prowess and infantile desire to say 'I can do it too!'

The female collective would ultimately be perfectly happy to see female sports overrun by troons, because they could then wait however many years until cuckservatives adopted the 'troons are women' position, and then attack them for their misogynistic belief that troons are women.

40
Steampunk_Moustache 40 points ago +41 / -1

It's a 'damned if you do, damned if you don't' role. You've got to be crazy to take that job in this day and age.

You won't know if a shoplifter might shoot you until they've pulled the gun, and the time between pulling the gun and pulling the trigger might be milliseconds.

All those videos you see of security guards just standing still, silently watching blacks steal entire shelves full of goods? That's a security guard who has decided niggers are too dangerous to deal with.

4
Steampunk_Moustache 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's a bunch of men finding a backdoor to getting pussy.

The backdoor being pretending eachother's assholes are vaginas.

7
Steampunk_Moustache 7 points ago +7 / -0

I draw, write, render, and animate porn.

I know exactly what kind of degenerate filth turns me on, and drag is not it.

And no, troons and drag fags will never be futa. YOU WILL NEVER BE A FUTANARI. YOU WILL NEVER BE A DICKGIRL. NOT EVEN THE PRIME YEARS OF BAILEY JAY COMPARE TO A FUTA.

2
Steampunk_Moustache 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, because a single female doesn't have to buy anything herself. She can be 30 years old and living with her parents and men will still marry her and pay for her existence.

10
Steampunk_Moustache 10 points ago +10 / -0

13/50 just never seems to go away, does it?

It's the triple copy of the warrior gene.

10
Steampunk_Moustache 10 points ago +11 / -1

They're just dropping the mask. The reality is that this has been the policy of the corporate world for over a decade.

Whites got too close to turning against the banksters in 2012, so whites need to be turned into minimum wage bottom feeders living hand to mouth, too busy trying to survive to think about protesting against their owners.

40
Steampunk_Moustache 40 points ago +40 / -0

Nobody gave a shit about drag queens until there was an orchestrated push to get them talking about sex and gay shit in front of children, or stripping and gyrating in front of children.

Pantomime dames have existed forever.

Bugs bunny has been dressing up as a woman for 70 years.

Drag queens have been on TV for as long as I've been alive.

But it isn't the same any more. The tone of the content has shifted away from 'gay men making fun of women' to 'genderqueer weirdos obsessed with getting up close with children.'

Another difference between then and now that I notice- their real name used to be publicized almost as much as their stage name, drawing a distinction between the man and his fictitious female persona. Today, either the stage name is all you see, or they don't even bother with one. This an quiet insistence that the persona is the reality, even though we know it isn't.

Not every 'drag show' is a problem. But the recent trends - that have been promoted by corporate media - those trends need to be stopped dead in their tracks.

6
Steampunk_Moustache 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm in support of this as it will help us crush rising economies in the developing world by rendering their natural resources economically useless.

The more nations we keep in poverty, the richer we will be.

So long as we have borders, that is.

14
Steampunk_Moustache 14 points ago +14 / -0

Unless there is a major course correction this decade, Scott Adams' words will ring in the ears of every white shitlib as they are dragged out of their cars in the middle of a chimpout.

15
Steampunk_Moustache 15 points ago +15 / -0

weakened immune systems

AIDS. They were homosexuals with AIDS.

1
Steampunk_Moustache 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doing that to a little kid?

He should have been slaughtered on the spot.

7
Steampunk_Moustache 7 points ago +8 / -1

Not only that but the CPfags hate loli in the first place. They think its just horribly unfair that loli is legal and their fucked up child abuse fetish isn't.

Correct. We a similar reaction to 'futanari' - It is wildly popular in erotic art, but that huge popularity doesn't translate into even remotely comparable popularity for pre-op trannies, or women wearing strap-ons (possibly even less popular than trannies? Not sure), because the drawn (or even 3D rendered) image is fundamentally different to the reality of supposed real world equivalent.

This difference in reactions gets troons so salty that they often turn against the term 'futanari' and call it a slur out of, essentially, jealousy.

I know lots of guys who'd pay me $200 to draw a girl with fifteen inch cock and a nut sack the size of their skull, to whom the average troon is a disgusting uggo, and the average woman with a strap-on is a pale imitation. They'll fantasize about cartoon futa cock, but they'd never a touch another real dick in a million years because it's just fundamentally not the same thing as the illusion created by artists.

4
Steampunk_Moustache 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's a tough subject to understand unless you start learning to draw it yourself, or least start analyzing what features make stylized characters 'attractive' or 'unattractive'. But just purely analyzing, you will run into your own biases. Only by sincerely trying to draw stylized characters that crowds of people find attractive yourself will you really learn the myriad ways you can utterly fail, and only then will you begin to get sense of what's really going on.

Most people would find it close to impossible to put into words any explanation of why one stylized character design tickle's people pickles and another does not.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›