16
Stagecoach 16 points ago +17 / -1

I would move the heavens and the stars for you, but I'm not ready to commit to monogamy with you.

I'm in love with finding out how you do all your mental equations and solve life.

These people really are 30 year old children.

27
Stagecoach 27 points ago +27 / -0

Mace was the lone Republican to sponsor H.R.5776 - Serving Our LGBTQ Veterans Act, legislation establishing a Center for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer

Kind of ironic that she sponsored benefits programs for trannies and supported gay marriage, but then puts her foot down when a tranny wants to use her bathroom. Just a ban at the Capitol, nowhere else.

10
Stagecoach 10 points ago +10 / -0

I like how butthurt he gets about the community note:

Yet she saw what no one else could.

Please help address the community note on this thread. I never claimed that she solved the problem.

That first statement kind of sounds like he was claiming she was the one who solved the problem.

48
Stagecoach 48 points ago +48 / -0

What are these allies giving us in return?

10
Stagecoach 10 points ago +10 / -0

Soon you'll see things our way.

Jesus you weren't kidding.

8
Stagecoach 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's not just puberty blockers anymore. There are hospitals actually performing bottom surgery on minors. First they said it didn't happen, and now they say it happens but it's extremely rare. But of course those people who feel the need to emphasize how "rare" it is won't denounce it. They secretly want it to be more common.

7
Stagecoach 7 points ago +7 / -0

What do these corporations get out of this? I still can't believe that child transing isn't universally denounced. I can't even wrap my head around how anyone thinks it's ok.

5
Stagecoach 5 points ago +7 / -2

But without tattoos, what excuse would drunken partygoers have for feeling each other up?

5
Stagecoach 5 points ago +5 / -0

They love showing women in hijabs because it allows them to condemn sexism while also giving them an out to say, "hey we're not Islamophobic."

8
Stagecoach 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think people who favor Oxford commas (like myself) tend to have more analytical personalities. Oxford commas undoubtedly help to avoid ambiguity in certain situations, whereas the argument for not using them usually appeals to aesthetics — they want to avoid using too much punctuation because they feel it clutters their writing.

15
Stagecoach 15 points ago +15 / -0

I think you're referring to [Recte]. [sic] is used when no edits are made to the quotation.

10
Stagecoach 10 points ago +10 / -0

The lack of Jews allocated to go before the world and justify the next and possibly more brutal phase of Israeli genocide will likely polarize the Gaza issue back to its usual left versus right divide, as well as provide at least some reputational relief to the global Jewish community. This will allow Jewish operatives on the left, who are struggling to prevent anti-Zionist discourse from veering into broader conversations about Jewish power, to spin their familiar narrative about doomsday prophecy believing white Christians directing reluctant Jews for their own benefit. When all is said and done, white Christian Americans could end up as a scapegoated screen for Israel’s actions if a drastic escalation, such as a full Palestinian expulsion, occurs.

This speculation is based on Trump's cabinet NOT having jews in it? Also a little ironic that he capitalizes "Jew" but not "white".

50
Stagecoach 50 points ago +50 / -0

r/christianity, the place where atheists smugly tell Christians that Jesus would have loved gays and hated Trump.

3
Stagecoach 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually she doesn't use the word "immigrants" in the video clip. But the estimate is still bullshit.

4
Stagecoach 4 points ago +4 / -0

It started with an old tweet Trump made in 2011 about his crystal collection. Here it is

17
Stagecoach 17 points ago +17 / -0

"So he says to me, 'Donald, you can't trap my soul. You're out of grand soul gems.' Grand! Can you believe this guy, folks? So anyway, he's trapped in a petty soul gem now. In my inventory. Right next to a scribe."

6
Stagecoach 6 points ago +6 / -0

The analysis isn't really wrong, but the part where he says, "the film forces the viewer to think on a philosophical plane, especially about Karl Popper's paradox of tolerance" comes across as a bit pretentious to me. The same reviewer also says that Dirty Harry may be fascist later on in that comment thread.

3
Stagecoach 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tolerance as a virtue generally implies self-restraint where appropriate. For example, if someone says something that pisses you off, you tolerate it to the extent that you don't chimp out and murder them over it. Or if you have children or family members that get on your nerves, you tolerate them rather than cutting them off or lashing out over petty matters.

There isn't really any need to redefine the word. Tolerance in its original meaning was already perfectly sensible

1
Stagecoach 1 point ago +1 / -0

I got that, I'm just confused by why that was your response to my comment.

1
Stagecoach 1 point ago +1 / -0

Knowing her, probably the latter. They used to be Christians, but then started swinging hard left after renouncing their faith, and lately she's been repeating a lot of cliche feminist talking points.

view more: Next ›