Sort of... It's odd that the shooter kept his ID on him. With explosives in the car I suspect his plan was to do the shooting escape in the car and then minecraft himself with the explosives. Why carry the ID? Amateur night I guess or he wanted people to know who he was. (although they could've ID'd him from the serial # on the rifle and the VIN on the car)
Still... isn't it odd that a 20 year old kid has almost no social media?
archive - https://archive.ph/XQYFq
They may be right for asking the question but how about a few days after as part of reflection after the investigations have been completed and NOT GO STRAIGHT FOR THE POLITICAL NARRATIVE LESS THAN 14 HOURS AFTER THE SHOOTING?!
DEI PROFESSIONAL MY ASS
Typical. Terrorist bombing in London? Oh, we can't jump to conclusions until the facts come out. Black man drives a truck through a christmas parade? Well, we're not sure what exactly happened here... it might've been a problem with the brakes... White man shoots up a church? REEE TOTAL HATE SPEECH, GUN CONTROL, WHY WONT THE WYTE MAN STOP HIS HATE.
Trump gets shot.
Whoopi Goldberg: :"well.... wuz he shot shot?"
By default a documentary has to have a narrative. Why is the author bothering with this person/subject matter? What's the point? That part doesn't bother me and yeah, it's used by the left for the propaganda all the time "Whoee, let's look into the life of super-hero woman Ruth Bader Ginsberg!"
My comment here is that this isn't even "propaganda documentary" level - it's bad tumblr fan-shipping fic level!
I mean... Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter is probably more factual!
Oh yeah - it's tiring. My older relatives who are still plugged into the propaganda and relatively centrist are all talking about "Project 2025" as if they're informed and thinking they're just not gonna vote this election because Biden is obviously demented and, well, we had all those riots under Trump and that'll happen again so what's the point.
Really - people do NOT think for themselves.
uh-huh.
So fan-shipping is now considered a "documentary".
This is all the way up there with people claiming transgenders have always existed. Like, they had hormonal therapy and plastic surgery back then? I mean, yeah, eunuchs and all, but they didn't even consider themselves transgender... and it only went one way...
So here's the best part... To show their virtue signaling and how oh-so-righteous they are they specifically call out "transgender" men and women SEPARATE from men and women... Ergo - transgender men and women are NOT... men and women.
But if you asked these same HR people that, they'd tell you there's no difference.
"But you said there's a difference in your ad?"
"REEEEEEEEEE"
Nope - that’s the All in the Family house to a T
https://cms.mit.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/All-in-the-Family-background.jpeg
ST TNG was absolutely newage wokeism which Roddenberry had adopted over the years.
While TOS had its leftist points, especially in the later 2nd/3rd seasons as the show got co-opted. The stories were at least an open debate of the topics and not a preaching session that TNG loved to do. I mean cmon - oops, these prewarp people have seen us - gotta wipe their minds for their own good. Who thinks that’s a proper moral thing to do?!
Really though, media has always been controlled in the US. If not by the government outright then by “moral committees” that forced media to adhere to certain codes.
It’s just the utter hypocrisy though - the media and leftists REEED when Janet Jackson had her wardrobe “malfunction” on public tv and the Republicans, in power at the time, wanted the FCC to fine them. No no - that’s abhorrent to free speech! Now you have the leftists applauding the SC decision that it’s perfectly ok for government to coerce media companies to ban wrongthink.
On the bright side, the left has suddenly discovered they support gun rights again.