By default a documentary has to have a narrative. Why is the author bothering with this person/subject matter? What's the point? That part doesn't bother me and yeah, it's used by the left for the propaganda all the time "Whoee, let's look into the life of super-hero woman Ruth Bader Ginsberg!"
My comment here is that this isn't even "propaganda documentary" level - it's bad tumblr fan-shipping fic level!
I mean... Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter is probably more factual!
By default a documentary has to have a narrative. Why is the author bothering with this person/subject matter? What's the point? That part doesn't bother me and yeah, it's used by the left for the propaganda all the time "Whoee, let's look into the life of super-hero woman Ruth Bader Ginsberg!"
My comment here is that this isn't even "propaganda documentary" level - it's bad tumblr fan-shipping fic level!
I mean... Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter is probably more factual!