8
RoulerBleu 8 points ago +8 / -0

Nothing a few additional hundreds political imprisonments can't stop.

3
RoulerBleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Macron is there for a couple more years but he's not eligible as a candidate for the next presidential election. Dosen't mean he leaves politics though.

French presidential mandates last 5 years, and someone cannot do more than 2 consecutive mandates... but there is no limits on non-consecutive mandates.

5
RoulerBleu 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why?

Widely unpopular tax hikes and spending cuts or limits to reduce the deficit to 5% of the total budget...

partly as the state spent big to cushion the economy from the Covid-19 pandemic

from the government lockdowns, not the cold.

And the consequences of the energy crisis due to their negligence of making themselves dependant on Russian energy.

Edit : Let's not forget the billions of Euros wasted on invaders' welfare.

When Trump warned them about their energy dependance to Russia, the EU leaders laughed at him.

Globalists don't understand, or aren't affected much by, the consequences of loss of independance and homogeneity. It's the general public who has to suffer nearly all of the consequences.

2
RoulerBleu 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got a good laugh from this.

10
RoulerBleu 10 points ago +10 / -0

Jesus drank alchool (wine), and it's part of the Church ritual in Christianity. So alchool isn't a sin by default.

Getting drunk ( and doing drugs in general ), as using ressources to pursue useless pleasures and impairing your decision making, is a sin on a similar level to over-eating.

It is as a warning not to let yourself fall into depravity.

You can consider special occasions in moderation are not considered depravity, otherwise Jesus wouldn't have changed water into wine for the wedding feast at Cana.

2
RoulerBleu 2 points ago +2 / -0

“I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.”

She was told ''you will'', she answers ''I am the Lord's servant''. Not exactly supporting your point. Is ''May your word to me be fulfilled.'' supposed to be enthousiastic consent after the decision has been made for her?

I suppose my classes and Church were not Real 1992 Catholics enough.

Back to my initial point :

I was raised Catholic. At no point ever in the classes or church readings was she asked about carrying and birthing the son of God. She was told by an angel God had chosen her for that purpose.

Which I maintain. The ''solution'' to modern concerns about Mary's consent is rather obvious anyway : God knows everything, so of course he would pick a woman who would want to do it, and just told her after picking her. Which still sounds weird by today's standarts.

1
RoulerBleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is the story we were taught, as the Bible says it :

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+1:26-38&version=NIV

26 In the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, 27 to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. 28 The angel went to her and said, “Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.”

29 Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. 30 But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. 31 You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus. 32 He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, 33 and he will reign over Jacob’s descendants forever; his kingdom will never end.”

34 “How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?”

35 The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called[a] the Son of God. 36 Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be unable to conceive is in her sixth month. 37 For no word from God will ever fail.”

38 “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.” Then the angel left her.

Not ''would you please?'' but ''you will''. God commands, she says so be it.

Edit : Nevermind your website, which is blocked, here is the Vatican Catechism in French ( because I searched like that ) and the line you refer to marches translation, so I concede that the 1992 Vatican catechism says that... Which is different from what the Bible says.

https://www.vatican.va/archive/FRA0013/__P1H.HTM

Not the first time the something contradictory is found in the Church or the Bible.

13
RoulerBleu 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sounds perfectly in line with how Democrats use taxpayers and government agencies, military, and American lives, for their personal profit.

10
RoulerBleu 10 points ago +10 / -0

Sitting right there with them : Kathy Hochul / The Government.

14
RoulerBleu 14 points ago +14 / -0

And those germs from open spaces will get to her and everyone regarless of pseudo-sanitary circus, whereas abstinence and strict monogamy are near 100% effective at avoiding STDs forever ( you might get raped or stabbed by a junkie with a needle though, especially in cities controles by leftists ).

3
RoulerBleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was raised Catholic. At no point ever in the classes or church readings was she asked about carrying and birthing the son of God. She was told by an angel God had chosen her for that purpose.

12
RoulerBleu 12 points ago +12 / -0

There were two significant options if you voted this election.

Harris, MIGA candidate married to a jew, who openly despises White people, wants to troon/castrate anyone between the age of 0 to 99 who claims gender confusion, broadly hates freedom of speech and openly campaigned for censorship on social media, anti gun rights, for open borders with infinity welfare to invaders well-beyond what is handed to ''welfare-Americans'', shits on the USA for everything that matters while only praising it to subvert it as ''a nation of inclusion, hope and tolerance''. Global Warming cultist, ruins the economy, Big Bureaucracy suffocating everyone under taxes and red tape regulations. Will flood the country with the third world at 200MPH.

Well I say that as if those were her positions. She's basically like Biden : an empty vessel for Globalist agendas. Barely more coherent than Biden in her wording, but 90% of what she says is empty word salad and she sounds drunk 24/7.

And Trump, a MIGA candidate who is also MAGA in some aspects, broadly defends freedom of speech... except if you offend the Chosen he married most of his kids to. Smaller bureaucracy, drill baby drill that oil, better for the economy, will flood the country with the third world, ''as long as they come here legally!'' at 125MPH.

Most of his policy positions seems to be his own.

Either way Israel wins. The question is, how much will the USA lose. The answer was ''less than with Harris''. But the decline continues at a slower pace.

And there might be some major Deep State meltdown over his nominations for the Department Of Goverment Efficiency and the FBI. A handful of poisons might get pulled from the food supply by RFK. I don't think he will be allowed to touch the poison injected into kids though.

7
RoulerBleu 7 points ago +7 / -0

Gay pride parade called ''racist and islamophobic'' for having its path go through one muslim-majority street.

Gay pride parade called ''transphobic'' because drag queens offend troons.

What a time to be alive.

3
RoulerBleu 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is no need for ''inclusion'' in professional soccer.

Play the damn game, wear the damn uniform.

16
RoulerBleu 16 points ago +16 / -0

What a surprise /s.

Let's test their charitable intentions by sending all these asylum seekers and immigrants into Israel.

13
RoulerBleu 13 points ago +13 / -0

Now it's an opportunity for woke groomers and pharmaceutical companies to sterilize kids, mutilate them in lucrative surgeries, and keep them dependent all their lives on drugs.

1
RoulerBleu 1 point ago +1 / -0

From a moral point of view, the baby is entirely innocent. Kill the rapist, not the baby if you so desperately want to kill.

From an evolutionary perspective, you don't want to perpetuate the genes of rapists. which is a moral problem you end up burdening the future of your kind with.

All these complex moral questions are handwaved-away by at-will abortion advocates who argue a woman should never be incovinienced by a baby for a few months before dumping it to adoption.

31
RoulerBleu 31 points ago +32 / -1

There is no excuse for picks for nominations that should be disqualified by the most simple background check or their track record.

15
RoulerBleu 15 points ago +15 / -0

If you live life as if there are no respiratory viruses, you'll sometimes get sick, and you'll live your life.

If you live your life to avoid all respiratory viruses, you'll sometimes get sick, and you'll have let your life pass unlived.

Best summary of why the 2 years of insanity government put us through were for absolutely nothing. Well except the power transfer to them, the WHO, and wealth transfer to a fringe minority of speculators and pharmaceutical companies.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›