2
RaceCreatesCulture 2 points ago +3 / -1

Sounds like you are a WN then but you don't like the label of WN so you try to distance yourself from that even though that's what you are. At the end of the day if you want your nation to be mostly White people only, you're a WN. Kind of like how if you're White, you're White, even though White people consist of Catholics, Pagans, Protestants, Atheists, etc... but just because you dislike Pagans doesn't mean you aren't White if you are indeed White. It sounds to me like you are a WN even if you don't agree with some of the other people who call themselves WN.

You are 100% right though that being all White is necessary but insufficient. A big problem I have with many WNs is that too many of them think all-White is the only necessary thing to fix the country.

I think religion in the end matters a lot less than race. The White Catholics were less of a problem than the jews or Africans.

6
RaceCreatesCulture 6 points ago +6 / -0

White Nationalists are VERY divided between Christianity and Paganism. It would be very unfair to characterize them as Pagan. I've seen an equal amount of both in the WN communities both irl and online.

However, the creation of hatred toward minorities by WNs is very real. Trying to distance oneself from a group because of that makes sense.

I was speaking mainly with regard to the ideas of creating a White Nationalist State. If you're a race realist then wouldn't the conclusion you also come to is that society would be ideal if the country was all mostly 1 race?

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's no fixing the games from big studios because people keep buying the games. As long as people keep buying the games at the quality of the level they are produced, you'll never see this quality improve.

2
RaceCreatesCulture 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, something Canadians might not be aware but the Charter of RIghts and Freedoms actually allows for "reverse discrimination".

Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability

Right in the Charter is the ability to discriminate as long as you're doing so to help "disadvantaged" people. In modernity, that means essentially that discrimination to hurt White Men specifically is allowed under the guise of helping disadvantaged people but discrimination that hurts anyone else is not allowed more-or-less.

The truth about the situation is Canada needs to abolish the Charter of Rights and Freedoms along with the Bill of Rights. Discrimination of any kind should be allowed. Then let the race and gender wars commence.

30
RaceCreatesCulture 30 points ago +32 / -2

I don't think anyone should go to prison for having improper pixels on a computer monitor unless someone was harmed in the creation of those pixels.

10
RaceCreatesCulture 10 points ago +10 / -0

How can you understand a White Nationalists perspective well-enough but not be a White Nationalist?

21
RaceCreatesCulture 21 points ago +22 / -1

Men and women are significantly different despite our culture's attempt at brainwashing everyone into thinking men and women are equal or that equality is even something that should be sought after an an inherent good in itself.

To answer your question, you need to understand how the supply/demand curve for sex applies to boys and girls. Young girls are in high demand but young girls are in short supply. Young boys are not in high demand at all and are in high supply. Further to this in our culture, male sexuality is oppressed while female sexuality is not. In essence, girls don't feel the need to ask to see a man's penis because when a girl truly wants to see a boys or mans penis, she always can. Girls are never denied penises when they want penises. Boys on the other hand can't get access to boobs whenever they want.

Why is the reversal never depicted? Because it's unrealistic. Young girls know they could likely gain access to an older man's penis if she simply asked for it without needing to "make-a-wish", whereas young boys know the only way they'll get access to boobs is by making a wish. Therefore the show is depicting things from an accurate perspective. It's also why in men/boys mind they would find a scene funny because it's relatable. It's not actually very relatable for girls/women to "make-a-wish" to see a man's penis. All women/girls know they wouldn't need to "make-a-wish" for that, they'd just need to ask but they wouldn't be compelled to ask because penises aren't highly sought after by women since they're so easy to get when they want them unlike boobs for young boys.

9
RaceCreatesCulture 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm Canadian and I can say the government has been active lately with a lot of media censorship bills so this wouldn't surprise me if true at all.

10
RaceCreatesCulture 10 points ago +11 / -1

I remember the whole beginning of this and how everything transpired.

What really happened is this...

When the "alt-right" movement was first gaining popularity in the beginning of Donald Trump it was incredibly anti-women relative to the mainstream. Anyone who was a dissident toward the female influence in mainstream society was dialed-in to the "alt-right" movement at this time. That would have included guys like Imp1 and all the gamergate crowd. The pinnacle move Trump did to bolster this support was when the girl asked Trump about if someone should earn the same as men and Trump responded that if they did the same work they should get paid the same. Such an obvious and true statement at the time was considered misogynistic and it was "offensive" but it secured the support of all the men who were fed up with our gynocratic society at the time. This crowd started pushing 2D > 3D or the whole liking anime girls better than real girls. At first it was a bit of a running gag with some truth to it but in reality there was a lot more truth to it than people originally let on which is why it stuck so well.

Where things started going downhill is when Trump was gaining serious support among the average "normie" people of America. The suburban moms and the blue-collar average joe guys. The Q types, along with the women who all think they're NAWALT (Not All Women Are Like That; IE. they think they're exceptional and not like the liberal women). These people don't understand much of what's going on in society and found the anti-female supporters of Trump to be offensive and believed these supporters were detracting from the movement with their misogyny. Trump himself pivoted entirely away from the pro-male crowd to bolster his female support. This led to Trump supporters naturally trying to distance themselves from the anti-female crowd and attacking the nerds for their taste in anime was how they'd do it. Women always attack men who don't like women because that's an affront to women and cucked men who worship women (simps) generally attack men for the same because these men think a man's value is based on what kinds of women he can get so if they only like 2D women, it's because he can't get women so he has no value as a man. These are generally your low-class tradcucked men and room temperature IQ "professional" men. This is what eventually dominated the Trump movement and that's why eventually it seemed like the pro-2D crowd died off and went away because they no longer were a part of any large political movement. These people are still around but a lot of them aren't involved in politics because none of the current favorites within any party are pro-men/anti-women anymore.

1
RaceCreatesCulture 1 point ago +6 / -5

If only PP would abolish the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Act that preceded it. They are some of the worst laws on the books.

5
RaceCreatesCulture 5 points ago +5 / -0

With regard to sexism in the United States, historically and currently still, due to women having greater perception of being victims in need of aid in the judicial system, false accusations of rape made by women against men often result in wrongful convictions, and led to extrajudicial acts of violence against men such as lynchings.

16
RaceCreatesCulture 16 points ago +16 / -0

I thought the South Korean method was make the women so feminist no one wants to fuck them.

2
RaceCreatesCulture 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think arranged marriages for sex would be superior to teenage sex without marriage tbh.

5
RaceCreatesCulture 5 points ago +6 / -1

The history is young girl with older man. Even Plato suggested the ideal age of marriage between man and woman was 25-35 for men and 16-20 for women and that was BC. Thousands of years ago. Teenage boys and girls being together is a rather modern degenerate take. Teenage boys need to grow into men before they start a family and teenage girls need to start a family before they expire like raw milk.

2
RaceCreatesCulture 2 points ago +2 / -0

16-20yo girls are ideal for marriage.

3
RaceCreatesCulture 3 points ago +5 / -2

Not between boys and girls they aren't. Teenage boys are not ready for families. I support 25-35yo men with teenage girls but I don't believe teenage boys should be with teenage girls at all.

7
RaceCreatesCulture 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, we should reduce the amount of people on the bottom rung which then would increase the price of your labor. Ban immigration and deport all non-Whites from NA and Europe. Then you will get paid sufficient for your labor without the need for unions. Unions aren't actually the solution to the problem. If the price of labor is too cheap that's because there's too many laborers (supply/demand). We need LESS labor so the price of labor goes up.

6
RaceCreatesCulture 6 points ago +7 / -1

Then perhaps you should either cease to exist or own the capital instead of being a mere laborer. Why did your parents have you as a child if you're so poor?

4
RaceCreatesCulture 4 points ago +6 / -2

wtf... since when did KIA2 turn into ChatGPT versions of myself.

5
RaceCreatesCulture 5 points ago +5 / -0

You'd think but in reality 50% of the school who are just as ugly as the ugliest teachers would be turned on.

12
RaceCreatesCulture 12 points ago +14 / -2

Ideally, they should go to school to learn skills to better please men.

11
RaceCreatesCulture 11 points ago +13 / -2

Huh? You can always just marry off girls at 16yo to 30yo men if you want. Having separate schools and home-schooling doesn't change this if that's what you want. Just because teenagers aren't fucking each other doesn't mean you won't get children. I mean most sex education tells girls to go on the pill and use condoms which is antinatalist

30
RaceCreatesCulture 30 points ago +33 / -3

The whole basis of sexual education was fucked up in the first place.

The idea was to reduce teen pregnancies. Why? Because girls and boys were fucking thanks to meeting in school. The solution was always to abolish mixed schools and/or go back to home schooling.

5
RaceCreatesCulture 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nothing good has come from a union except getting paid more money to do less work. That's a great idea if you're a lazy communist.

13
RaceCreatesCulture 13 points ago +13 / -0

There is better proof, yes. There's hundreds of countries with democracies and obvious fake elections even the left admit are fake yet the left insists their own elections are never faked. Crazy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›