He's not entirely wrong but like most things, there's two sides to it. There truly are some National Socialists that are very socialist and there have been some on ConPro. They're basically the "communism would work if it weren't for Ns and Js!" crowd. Usually poorer guys that think the only reason they aren't a millionaire is because of Js. That's not everyone on ConPro though but there is a lot.
Yeah exactly but did you know the only reason you can't find a decent woman is because you play video games and aren't a real man?
It is definitely bigger than gaming.
My beef with them comes down to the issue of women in western society. This group tends to blame men for everything. They're the epitome of, fuck you got mine and refuse to consider the systemic impacts to relationships. They'll talk all day about jewish subversion destroying our culture and the only reason they aren't richer is because of jews but they think because they got what they wanted out of life with regards to women that everyone who didn't is just a bad person. It's like, well what about all the people who have plenty of resources despite jews, does that mean the only reason you struggle to buy a house is because you're a bad person?
They'll insult and ridicule men who don't get the intimate outcomes they want in life suggesting it's a failure of the individual man but for all other outcomes in life, it's okay to blame the jew instead of the individual man. This inherent contradiction is personal for me because I'm literally the opposite. I have everything else a man could want in life but the intimate outcomes. They suggest that they are great people and the only reason they don't have what they want out of life is jews but when I say the same thing, they say no it's actually because you aren't this, that or the other thing and if you were those things then you'd have what you want. Can we not just apply that logic to them also? Maybe if they were this that or the other thing they'd get what they wanted out of life too instead of blaming the jew.
Their logic doesn't work. They believe in individual attribution to outcomes in life when they like their outcome but then they blame others whenever they aren't getting the outcome that they want but when other people pull the same logic they turn around and say it's entirely the individual not structural. This lack of integrity in their arguments bothers me.
Exactly. I like the alpha fucks, beta bucks metaphor for thot to religious. It's quite the accurate portrayal of what's going on here.
No lesson is being learned. Nothing good is happening. People are just enabling women's bad behavior.
Well, I'm a millennial so there's still a lot of these summer camp guys and girls out there. You're just unlikely to encounter them as readily as you would have when you were younger. I remember 5 years ago when I was 30yo working downtown a major city with a bunch of other people around my age, if someone asked you what you did on the weekend and you answered "played video games", you'd be regarded as a loser. Everyone instead would talk about "went to the mountains, went camping, travelled to X place, etc..." or something to that effect. If you weren't spending your weekends going somewhere outdoors then you were a loser. Maybe that has changed but for some reason, I doubt it.
The wannabe puritan luddite right-wingers are pathetic. Their idea of the ideal human basically amounts to becoming gardeners and popping out children like good farm animals. They supposedly reject modernity but they benefit from all the comforts afforded to them thanks to modernity. They are way too judgmental of people for all wrong reasons to ever be considered good people. Like at the end of the day it matters not whether you get enjoyment from taking a hike vs. playing a video game but they act like it makes all the difference about a person's character.
You are right to hate them and you are right to call them right-wingers. Many of these right-wingers would reject the "right-wingers" on this group for being "degenerate" because they like video games, anime or big titties. Personally, as time goes on, I'm starting to hate this brand of right-winger almost more than I hate leftists. Leftists are misguided but this brand of right-winger is willfully hateful and judgmental for the wrong reasons with 0 ounce of sympathy or compassion. If you think they're bad online, they are worse in-person. Not good people to be around at all because of their misguided air of superiority. Many leftists want to do good but don't know how such that they end up committing evil but you can tell they're good people deep-down whereas I consider these brand of right-wingers as willingly engaging in evil. I suppose at the end of the day the right-wing and the left-wing both have good and evil people caught up on the wing. This brand of right-winger you bring up happens to often have a lot of the evil ones as far as I'm concerned.
IMO, women like this need to do something a little more for repentance than simply giving up onlyfans AFTER she has already profited from it amd in this particular situation she jacked her onlyfans prices to make even more money from her announcement of "finding God". Will she take all her proceeds and donate it to a church?
The issue I have with whores and sluts like this woman is that whoring and slutting around is something a women can only do while she's young and in her prime then it stops being valuable to her anymore. She sucked all the value out of it and then and only then does she decide to "find God". That's bullshit because she caused all the damage from her sin and benefited from her sin and then is supposedly giving up her sin only when the sin is no longer useful to her. She hasn't found jack shit except how to exploit the system to her benefit and get everyone supporting her for it.
What about all the men she hurt because of her whoring and slutting around? How will she ever repay these men given her past sins? What will she actually do going forward to seek repentance for her past sins? In a lot of these cases, the women do nothing and have learned nothing. Her actions have had a harmful impact on society at large. It's not enough that she "finds God" after she's caused all her damage. She needs to make amends for it.
I doubt I'll ever be the same but it's close enough I don't think it'll matter too much. No brain or eye damage which is the most important thing.
This is true but something to consider is that guys doing roids that may rage are way more likely to be found in areas where you find average good people. Heroin addicts, not so much. You usually find heroin addicts in already super sketchy parts of cities that average good people won't visit. So while what you say is true, I think roids have the potential to be a bigger problem for average good people.
I got attacked and hospitalized, needing plastic surgery because of a guy I know for a fact was taking steroids. He attacked me while I was sleeping too (as cowardly as it gets) and he's twice my size. When I was talking to doctors and explained what happened to me without the doctors even being tipped off to steroid involvement one of the first things the doctor asked me is if the guy was taking steroids.
I know exactly what you mean TC and I think people are starting to catch on too. The roid rage is real and it's usually guys with fragile egos that have something to prove that take steroids in the first place.
"Video Games are escapism"
Posts on X, which is just a dopamine high facilitating the illusion of doing something somehow any more productive than "escapism".
I'm fine with women not wanting men with video games as a hobby but I would hope these kinds of women are the kinds of women who don't use any social media, most especially instagram and are constantly engaged in some sort of physical activity outside.
How many of these women bashing video games watch netflix?
I have consistently found that women who don't play video games and have a hate on for video games tend to be some of the lowest quality women. All the best quality women I've ever met have played video games. Even some of the hottest girls I've known still played Mario Kart for fun with their friends or something. The girls with such big egos that they have some sort of superiority complex regarding video game playing are women to stay the fuck around from. They be bitches.
TS is clearly talented and successful. Means nothing in terms of quality of the person.
Knowing what I know about TS, I have a hard time respecting any man that would date her but I can say that about a lot of guys dating a lot of women.
Still, I hope both of them find happiness in one another.
You really think this guy has his life together? You actually answered your question in your question... Why on Earth did a guy like that pick... Well, that's because he's a guy "like that". He's actually not a professional who has his shit together. He's on TS's level which is why they've ended up together.
I hardly know these people so I could be wrong on many counts but he strikes me as a simp in disguise. The kind of man who bases his value from the attention women give him instead of having his own value for himself come from within. That's why he'd put up with a girl like TS because she offers a lot of positive reinforcement for his self-esteem because of her looks and fame. That type of guy is precisely the kind of guy that would cheat though; however, TS is likely going to have a better chance to tame this sort of guy compared to any other girl. TS knows what kind of guy he is, likely because he's exactly the kind of guy she has historically dated. TS isn't a quality person either. Sooo they're probably good for each other.
Not all tomboys are the same.
The left hates feminine tomboys. The right hates masculine tomboys.
That's the main difference in a nutshell.
See, feminine tomboys are a thorn in the side of leftists because feminine tomboys demonstrate a woman can have similar functions in society to a man without losing any of her core essence that makes her a woman. She doesn't need to transition genders or anything and she can be happy and a woman and still like stuff typically attributed to men.
Masculine tomboys are a problem to the right because these women are basically just less effective men. They've destroyed all of what made them different from men (their femininity) while trying to become like men (have same roles/functions in society) but actually aren't as effective at anything in the end compared to actual men.
The left is obviously wrong. The right is kind of right. I say kind of because some people on the right don't distinguish between feminine and masculine tomboys but just label all tomboys as masculine, which is false. There's tomboys which have more feminine essence to their personality than many ditsy barbie girly girls who've rejected every male-centric "hobby or role". Some of these girls have extremely masculine essences.
At the end of the day this is the part all "sides" are noticing and where the battle lies. Feminine women are good. Masculine women are not. Femininity and masculinity is not directly based on likes, dislikes, hobbies, jobs, makeup, clothes, etc... but it can sometimes be correlated. In the end, a person's femininity and masculinity is something that's part of their core personality that comes out in the essence of their being when they engage with the rest of the world. Feminine women are generally good. Masculine women are generally not. I say generally here because there's exceptions. The reason masculine women are generally not good is because it's rare for a woman's actual spirit to be masculine so when she tries to be masculine she goes against her spirit which then materializes in the real world as mental health issues and body issues generally like anxiety/depression and unhappiness and bitterness etc... The more women embrace their feminine core, the happier they become.
You have picked up on some truths though. Some men's dislike for tomboys is bitterness and frustration over their own lack of hot submissive wife so they see these tomboys as wasted potential in a way. There's truth to what they're talking about but they sometimes miss the whole truth because they're hurt and upset at their own lack of women. Like not all female need to or even should fit some narrow objective mould of some ideal woman. There's always variation. A girl can like shooting guns, it doesn't make her any less of a woman than a girl who doesn't like shooting guns. It's mostly irrelevant. Everything else matters more.
I'm shocked at the number of people saying this is reasonable... no, it's not. Not at all. You don't set these sorts of "rules" with people unless you have huge trust issues and are very insecure. It's entirely the wrong way to go about things. If she can't trust her man to do the right thing without asserting these "rules", she shouldn't even be dating him. It's not her place to impose any sort of "rules" on him.
Also, the facetime one is funny to me because I've known some really hot girls that basically imposed this rule on their BFs and I also knew both the BFs and the hot girls were cheating on each other. Like, you don't think guys can come up with excuses when they need to? Sorry honey, I was doing some football practice with the boys and didn't notice your message. You know I usually workout at this time, sorry... Like, you're only fooling yourself with these rules and only low quality simps accept these sorts of rules. The kinds of guys that do anything for pussy. These are also the kinds of guys that like to have 3 different vaginas on the go at once because they're obsessed with vagina if they tolerate rules like these just to get access to vagina. You can't turn an unfaithful slut into an upstanding person with these sorts of micky mouse rules. So if that's what he is and you're worried maybe stick to your gut feeling and pick a better man instead of indulging your bad boy triad feelies because you won't change him and it's going to end exactly as you expect.
Obviously, what topic title is happening for sure but don't discount that in fact a lot of women are increasingly becoming bi with only male partners.
I've known some bi girls personally before and a common theme is all of them say men are way easier to have relationships with than women. Usually, the women liked to have sex with women but they preferred dating men.
It turns out that as a man's income increases to ~$300k+/yr, his height increases to 6'+ and his jawline increases to Giga Chad+ then women turn into house wives.
There's absolutely nothing new going on here at all. There's no new movement. There's no cultural shift. We're just seeing some rebranding of certain relationship dynamics that have always existed.
Men don't care that if they were super hot and wealthy, some girls might take on traditional gender roles for them. Men don't care because most men aren't super hot and wealthy. It's average men with average looks and average incomes that want traditional gender roles and not enough women are coming to the table with that. Even the supposedly based homesteading girls you see in White Nationalist groups oftentimes married some dude who inherited a farm or the money to buy one. Most guys aren't that.
The problem too with modern tradgirls is that all the girls want all the perks that come with traditionalism but with none of the duties toward the man that existed in traditional times. It ends up being a really bad deal for a lot of guys. Ask these trad girls how many of them are virgins saving their virginity for marriage... lol. "Trad". Sure.
This is just a botched negotiation. Lemon sees himself as more valuable than Musk did. It happens. Even though Lemon is a joke, I do think he'd probably have brought traffic so his demands probably aren't that unreasonable. The problem is that he's got no where else to go and Musk knows it so Musk was trying to get a sweet deal out of desperation. Lemon wasn't going to grovel so he came to the table with demands that showed that. Musk realized he wasn't going to get his sweet deal and scraped the idea.
Simp fathers are a huge problem in modernity.
I mean, that is how you want to classify things, sure. To me there's an extreme difference between a National Socialist and a Marxism though even if you might consider them equivalent given your scale. I also think there's a huge difference between liberaltarians that are racist and sexist compared to libertarians that are egalitarian.
I would argue you have a very narrow view of political ideologies. Outside of basically a very small select MAGA group of peoples, the idea that left-wing is authoritarianism and right-wing is libertarianism is not the norm. I'll also have you note the root word liber from liberal in libertarianism. Authoritarianism is in fact conservatism. Aristotle who wrote Politics was not a liberal by a long-shot and he advocated for staunch authoritarianism seeing the State as the ultimate good.
I completely understand your belief and I'm not insulting you. I just think you need to expand your horizons a little...
Let me quote one of the founding fathers for you:
“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations get corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.” ― Benjamin Franklin
You see, Mr. Franklin understood something you do not. When authority is wielded by good people you have a good result. When authority is welded by bad people you have a bad result. Authority is not bad in itself but rather it is the people who are either good or evil not the authority they wield. Mr. Franklin was saying that liberty is something only good people deserve because only good people would use their freedom in a good way. If you give too much freedom to evil people then evil flourishes thus in order to curtail evil you need authority over evil.
The problem with leftism is not that they want authority. The problem with leftism is that they are evil. The reason leftists are evil is because they are egalitarians in a reality that can never be this ideal. When good people want authority to combat evil that is a good thing.
Leftist ideology is underpinned by egalitarianism. That is the fundamental core belief of leftism that pervades all other leftist ideology.
Actual conservatism's main fundamental core belief is elitism. The very opposite of egalitarianism.
If you are not elitist then you are in fact liberal and it's just a question of which era of liberalism you are. Perhaps you're a 1960s liberal or a 1990s liberal but you're a liberal nonrtheless.
Thanks for just proving my point? Is that what you intended to do?
Speaking of movies and a recent one with some subtle rot. I tried watching that newish James Bond that came out and literally stopped it and shut it off when Bond was acting like a simp for a single mother. I mean, to me that's not subtle but to a lot of clueless people, that's subtle. Subliminal messaging teaching a new generation of men that simping for single mothers is a good "manly" thing cause Bond does it. What a joke. I'm sure to anyone aware of things watching Legal Weapon 3, they'd have immediately picked up on the rot but it was definitely subtle to the NPCs.
According to someone who bothers to care about this kind of shit (not me):