Not really a double whammy. The claim is that the creator has never touched a woman (not a real man with masculine traits). These are not mutually exclusive concepts, and he is correct.

Again, the CEO being a woman does not counter this assertion.

In addition, the C.E.O didn't create the art. And the art looks like shit.

Blames the white people, because all the black people moved away.

They lost me when they dropped mana burn.

I'm not understanding this graph, which games are what color?

Did Musk sell Starlink to Ukraine? Who was seeking use of Starlink and why?

I get none of that from the brief dialog examples we are given.

In fact, all the outrage in this thread seems to stem from the wording of the title.

Which again, I get none of from the examples provided.

Here is a semi legitimate thread about pronouns you can participate in.

https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17r9DoEs6T/youtuber-breakdown-over-pronouns/c/

But it's mostly just a you tubers need to generate clickbait by singling out a straw man.

You commented because you didn't wish to see a notification alerting you to my comments. That has got to be the stupidest thing I have read all morning.

Wait no. You didn't even receive a notification. You came into this thread intentionally read through a long chain of replies, not directed at you, and then commented, knowing that this would possibly trigger a reply, that would cause you to receive a notification by me, that you do not wish to see? That doesn't even make sense.

Hey, what do crazy pills taste like?

the nature of relationships between a business and the public.

And that will somehow explain to me the difference between taking offense and being triggered as a snowflake, and how I may have known this, had I ever known it. Which relates to how you are offended by the price of this AAA game. Which proves their lack of respect for you as a customer. Which is in relation to how that you are not offended by dialog, in a reply you made to a question I asked of somebody else?

Sure, that may as well of all have happened.

I'll be sure to, 'ask my therapist about that'. Why not?

Holy crap. It's just a re-skinned Fallout 4 without vats.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQkBvCG-Q6o

Callum's arguments are in bad faith. He has chosen a punching bag and isn't even addressing the man's real concerns. As the definition and usage of the word 'pronoun' has been subverted.

I'll tell you this much though. Callum really likes talking about himself. And that's ten minutes of my life that I will never get back.

Sir, I doubt that you are even capable of passing a Turing test. In fact, I don't think anyone in this thread is.

Humor me, simply quote the passage you were trying to reply to. Give me some context here.

She can be both a static quest giver and have character. This is a game.

Though congratulations for providing the most sane reply in this thread.

Which is probably why nobody up voted you so far. Can't have rational thoughts in an echo chamber can we? Nope, sure can't.

It's a puked up scree for political points.

Is it though, can you describe what aspects of her dialog that are pushing back against the 'patriarchy' or any other aspect of her dialog that extol woke virtues against family values? Or anything that you find offensive in any way what so ever?

And here is your dialog:

"You need anything for your ship, she's got you covered."

"She may be a little rough around the edges, but she's just looking out for her own. There's no one better to have your back."

"Naeva's got a fire in her. The kind you only see in an engine pushed to its limit. She doesn't half-ass a damn thing and I love her for it."

Take your time now. And lets have it. Anything, anything at all. Lets here it.

"show, don't tell" principle of writing.

I'd like to see that 'book'.

This is a game. Not a movie. Not a book.

You clearly don't understand when to tell and NOT show.

For reference Here is a scene that would have made for a humorous conversation between two men reminisced on over drinks. That is where "Tell don't show" becomes useful, as it is a scene that should have never been filmed.

At this point, do you even understand what the supposed fake outrage of this topic was even meant to be?

Why you up voted it? Who you are as a person?

Why you continue to reply?

Again, here is the title that this thread is based on:

Try not to cringe: Strong independent interracial lesbian astronauts who need no man in Starfield

To which you replied that you are offended by dialog existing in an RPG, and continue slide down that path defending that as your sole objection.

What the fuck is even going on here! Are you O.D'ing on crazy pills While sniffing powdered estrogen capsules!?!

It's not a movie. How are you not understanding that games are not movies?

Do you even understand what a game is?

Metal Gear Solid 4 is not a game. It was a mistake.

I don't understand whatever subculture you exist in, were anything you have said here makes any sense, to anyone.

Are you also offended by dialog?

Good thing you don't do actual table top. We would need to stop for emotional distress breaks every time the Game Master opened his mouth.

Sit down noob. And while your at it, shut up.

Is that someone you?

I'm more offended by this dialogue.

Are you? Are you really? You are offended by this?

++

• "You need anything for your ship, she's got you covered."

You can buy things for your ship. Or she can repair your ship.

• "She may be a little rough around the edges, but she's just looking out for her own. There's no one better to have your back."

She belongs to a faction or will react poorly to someone elses death.

• "Naeva's got a fire in her. The kind you only see in an engine pushed to its limit. She doesn't half-ass a damn thing and I love her for it."

Here is an aspect of her character you will not be able to derive through standard game play, or we wish for you to know about her up front.

++

You got replacement dialog for any of that? Because if not, you've said nothing here. Oh, yagh, lesbians are abuser, which is an agenda you wish to push I suppose. True or not. Is this thread of any actual value? Are they pushing modern woke tropes? Did you get any of that from your dialog examples?

None of that made me cringe.

Now lets ask some real Questions:

• Are there any good game play mechanics?

• Is it packed to the brim with loot boxes, and unavoidable subscription fees and micro transaction? Yes, or no?

• Are these actual characters or modern woke tropes crafted to push an agenda?

++

8 Hours later: Does nobody know the answer to any of my Questions? Really, nobody? Nobody knows anything about the actual game?

I have. She was fired.

It's criticism of his own work. As he does not see what he has created as having value.

Funny to see that the original character design had purple hair. Really dropped the ball on that easy layup.

Well, that's her ratting in the Woman's league.

Sammy Kerr?

It's this simple, do they appear to think about the Questions you ask them, or do they simply reply? That being said, your Question is quite open ended, and needs to be more specific on topics, range and form of analytical thought for a more accurate answer. Because as it stands you can say that everyone fits the standard for 'thinking outside of the box.'

Sometime later, Sasha, Gloria and her husband take Stereotypical Barbie, now going by Barbara Roberts, to a gynecologist for her first appointment.

The rest of the film seems to be deconstructions of Barbie tropes. Which is like, a good premise for a Twilight Zone episode, or possibly a B plot for Rick & Morty story line.

The abstraction of reality is way past gone on this one. We are dealing with Food Fight! logic.

I'd ask if the game play is any good. But modern games have done away with such concepts and are just interactive stories with payment schemes, visuals and propaganda.