He has to be prepared to add some nuance or he is never going to deliver a message that resonates with everyone. It's the same problem Tim calls Alex Jones out on, that Alex has reached the top of the mountain and is shouting about all the stuff he sees as if it's plainly obvious to everyone else (when it's not).
Tim is good at being able to put himself into the mental frame of the centrist everyman.
Milo... is just a good monologist, like pre-coma Peterson was.
and instead of clarifying the issue
you perpetuate
No, my audience is you and you alone. I'm critiquing why your message fails to resonate with the people you're trying to enlighten.
If you were to instead say "elite globalist cabal" as your initial pitch, you'd find the YOUR intended audience much more receptive to hearing more.
But YOUR method is like trying to sell Scientology by OPENING with the whole sacrificing DC-10's to the Volcano God thing.
You know I'm right, and you're just mad that the rest of the anglosaxon world doesn't know what both you and actual jewish people know.
You can sit there and know that jewishness is as much ethnicity as faith, and actual jewish people will agree with you completely.
But the overwhelming majority of smoothbrain christian/agnostics believe that the only thing they have to do to call themselves jewish is get cut, give up pork, and put out candles instead of decorating a tree.
That's what you have to work with.
Your framing is such that I don't even understand what you're saying here.
Linguistically, to the overwhelming majority of normies, there is no ethnicity component to the word "jewish".
Average normie American believes they could call themselves jewish if they were willing to give up pork.
Doesn't matter that the actual jewish disagree with them on that point. In the normie zeitgeist, it's a religion and nothing else, not an ethnicity.
Your attempts to use the word as an ethnicity will always end in misinterpretation because that connotation doesn't exist in the normie lexicon.
Nobody... in your circle.
But the overwhelming majority of normies, if you use the term "jewish", assume you mean a religion.
In the normie zeitgeist, there is no jewish ethnicity. They're just white people who go to different church and don't eat bacon.
Coming to the conclusion that "all several hundred of them are jewish so it's the jewish who are out to get me" is not a defensible statement and you know it.
It's a "globalist media cabal" is totally defensible.
We are all still Cromwellian. It's not a "catholic conspiracy" unless the Pope is behind it. Because historically... the Pope usually was.
No, the actual problem is that in the 90's everyone forgot that Louis Farrakhan was a Malcolm X follower (a guy who criticized King for not being violent enough). And then when X jumped ship to actual Islam, Farrakhan almost certainly had him killed.
But then the Democrats win the White House and he puts on the Million Man March and lo, everything is forgotten.
The whole country was duped into thinking Farrakhan was a "civil rights activist", instead of a race war extremist.
Instead Kanye wanted to launch straight into it and then couldn't rationally back up his claims so he stormed out. Pathetic.
Absolutely.
It can be trivially obvious, that there is an internationalist cabal set to destroy Kanye. But the second you put that on a religion, you've crossed a line in discourse. And I think Kanye thinks that he can be the next generation of Louis Farrakhan and yet still have everything else he had before.
And that's just not going to happen.
It was all downhill after the board let Eisner sack Katzenberg to stave off a coup.
Although really, it's all France's fault.
If French people hadn't been so down about Disney Paris then Eisner wouldn't have gone Palpatine-mode in the first place.
If they hadn't created Foucault and Derrida there wouldn't be wokism.
You know, the thing I liked about the Mayan doom calendar people, and the millennium doom people, and the heaven's gaters...
Was that that their predictions were tied to a fixed date they couldn't punt on.
Once their time came and past, that was it, they went away and left everyone alone from then on (ESPECIALLY the heaven's gaters).
OP, you could learn a thing or two from them.
Instead, people (esp white conservatives) whine about it
Because they don't have the intellect for strategic thinking. They think catching progressives being hypocrites is sufficiently damning in of itself (it's not).
From a legal perspective the Pepsi Harrier didn't tread any new ground.
But it was sensationalized and landed at a time when McDonalds had just been hammered for their Monopoly game being rigged, so the popular sentiment was that companies were more full of shit than normal.
It's more lasting impact was that companies moved to a "codes under caps" gimmick, where you could get things like music downloads (as mp3's became a thing).
You have the wrong mindset.
There is a public pool. Being public, people are allowed to bring babies there. The babies pee in the pool.
You, doing your laps, complain about the babies peeing in the pool, but it's public. Your only recourse is to build a private pool.
Which we're good at building things.
The moral of the story is that any not explicitly right wing space will be destroyed by the left. Complaining about control over space you've already ceded to the public is a waste of air.