11
OldBullLee 11 points ago +11 / -0

MMMmmm-hmmmm! I know dat's right!

18
OldBullLee 18 points ago +18 / -0

This suggests the validity of James Lindsay's latest thesis--that neo-Marxism is a form of religious gnosticism.

I have not listened to these lectures yet, but will when my reading list is cleared: "The Gnostic Parasite" and "The Role of Consciousness and the Evolution of the Gospel of Marxism." https://newdiscourses.com/

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's because academic feminism ("women's studies") was the first beachhead of neo-Marxism in the academy that provided the political blueprint for other cells of revolution which fall collectively into the category of "ethnic studies."

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

31/61 is more symmetrical and works better as a slogan anyway.

3
OldBullLee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Both US political sides are run by an international jewish banking cartel that worships the devil.

The Rothschilds?

6
OldBullLee 6 points ago +6 / -0

And the rich assholes living on Nob Hill and elsewhere keep buying their genuine Beluga and Iberian prosciutto by mail from Amazon, never venturing out except to the airport via private chauffeur. For entertainment they watch the Nest video of the UPS guy getting jacked again.

4
OldBullLee 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, now the world knows that "Seth Abramson" (whoever this otherwise anonymous asshole is) is a liar.

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't "Latino" a category in Dallas any more?

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

After. I can't even remember why I was tossed--probably an anti-tranny comment.

7
OldBullLee 7 points ago +7 / -0

Everybody paying attention already understands that the WH press corps is filled with careerist sycophants with a rogue gaining access every once in a while and confounding that ugly negress flak catcher.

It's always been this way for as long as I can remember. Up to Obama, or maybe Bush II, a few old and respected reporters were allowed to pose what seemed to be uncomfortable questions. Now even the pretense of openness is gone.

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree, and that's damn well-put.

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been permanently banned from Twatter.

3
OldBullLee 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm slow sometimes. And I assume good intentions until proven wrong.

11
OldBullLee 11 points ago +12 / -1

I'm aware of this and tone down my rhetoric considerably on other forums, using no profanity but the mildest and then not directed but just as an expression of exasperation.

They will not allow "dead-naming" and appear to censor the claim of truth that Walsh and Knowles make continually--that one cannot change sex.

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Naming the Devil gives you the power to fight it, but by aspiring to be a mainstream academic James doesn't have answers to the problems he highlights. The Ivory Tower needs to be torched, but James is trying to save it.

I suspect he'll give up trying to save the university. I think he's smart enough to recognize that we're playing a losing game with reform.

What's needed is a purge and a rebuilding, and this can be done with state-funded public universities, as we see with DeSantis and Rufo in FL.

by folx
5
OldBullLee 5 points ago +6 / -1

This is the truth that is so threatening to homos that it gets buried and denounced out of hand.

One isn't "born" homo but is conditioned and/or traumatized into being aroused by the same sex.

Leaving homos alone to play among themselves was the civilized, tolerant thing to do, but we've seen what happened with that, and it happens time and again. With toleration comes the further demand to abandon morality and ethics entirely for some relativistic nightmare where nothing is true and everything is permitted.

by folx
8
OldBullLee 8 points ago +8 / -0

thought the whole point of "conversion therapy" bans is that the therapy didn't work?

Yeah, that's another of their convoluted lies. Of course it works. That's why they oppose it.

One can be conditioned to respond sexually to just about anything.

by folx
2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe that has something to do with the fact that a Frankensnatch is easier to make and less disgusting than a Frankendick, despite the recent case of a Frankensnatch made from a man's colon causing a flesh-eating bacterial infection.

by folx
1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't consider that poll number to be anything but the result of adolescents and confused 20-somethings saying what they think is acceptable.

Anyone who is really hetero will not like gay sex.

The only thing that bothers me about this claim is imagining what sort of love lives these poor children will have as adults, if any.

2
OldBullLee 2 points ago +3 / -1

I regret having paid them four bucks for a year.

10
OldBullLee 10 points ago +10 / -0

Using plural pronouns for singular antecedents is the mark of an illiterate. Demanding others use nonsensical words to refer to you is narcissistic and deserves a punch in the mouth.

Ellen Page will forever be a woman, no matter what she believes, no matter what body parts she chops off, and no matter what her club demands from those outside of its deranged little circle of freaks.

Take your "queer identity" and shove it. Keep it within your Freak Ghetto.

How's that for some motherfucking hate speech?

16
OldBullLee 16 points ago +16 / -0

EVs are a con job. Only rich people can afford them and they buy them as status symbols.

4
OldBullLee 4 points ago +4 / -0

No idea who these people are, but why get hysterical and cry for "banning"? That's the entire problem with social media. Hell, getting banned is how I found this dissident's ghetto.

If someone's spamming or "hoarding communities" (whatever that means) just scroll past their shit.

Ignoring is more effective than having a hissy fit and demanding a "ban."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›