2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

They wonder why, and how they lost support. They even had to declare LGB without the T a hate group.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the legal action is appropriate based on what they allow their staff to say. My example of Picard is really a good example. It was torn to shreds as woke bullshit. This campaign against them tarnished their image.

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I edited my previous comment to point out that the author chose to put all the information in different places. Screen Rant isn't paying. His complaint about screen rant is they're producing so many articles to hit SEO he as a solo can't compete. That's not paying for screen time. Above I called it hitting all the topics because someone cares about something, and there's so much media.

If you reread the article, notice how short it is? Because all the information requires you to click to read another article. Doesn't that mean this author is also manipulating SEO while complaining about it? I had to read 4 articles to understand his complaint, and declined a pdf download.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I read what is posted. My takeaway is the author doesn't like the method of mass producing articles to hit SEO. I don't see that as an issue, do you?

Edit: I'd like to point out the articles are written in am intentional, click HERE for this bit of info, them in that article clicked HERE for this hot of info format.

It was written to confuse intentionally

1
Michalusmichalus 1 point ago +2 / -1

The author in the screen shot uses words like ,"seems to come up more often", and then wonders why they have legal woes. IF there is an issue, which I am not convinced, they didn't do a very good job selling it. Due to their half ass language, they left themselves open to this legality they're unhappy about.

The complaint is that Screen Rant is using the method of using a whole lot of articles to be seen. But, that only makes sense. There is a whole lot of media out there. Most of us don't give a damn about most of the media out there. They have to cover the bases. What a stupid complaint.

3
Michalusmichalus 3 points ago +3 / -0

I actually read screen rant. I have no idea what the screen shot is on about. I'm OOTL why X posts matter to screen rant. Screen Rant was willing to print how shitty the woke bullshit made Picard until season 3. So what nonsense is that man going on about? It was so bad there were petitions to make it noncanon. Then Riker directed season 3, and it's like a TNG movie. I watched season 3 without the bullshit before it.

Nothing screen rant wrote about Picard before season 3 matches this screen shot. You can go see for yourselves.

2
Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

That, and I truly believe their only joy is ruining the happiness that others had. Oh, the shit I used to say when I used to play. Sweet Baby Inc should rename itself to Killjoy Inc.

6
Michalusmichalus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Taking shit talk out of gaming put the training wheels on. Safe spaces, and participation trophies should have made their own things rather than deciding to break everything around them.

-4
Michalusmichalus -4 points ago +2 / -6

You make so many assumptions, it's clear you're someone that never bothered to read the materials they told you not to look at.

-1
Michalusmichalus -1 points ago +1 / -2

My sons and I have had more strange conversations than you would imagine. Gtfo out of here with your lunatic ," in your heart you know " bully bullshit. Kiss all of my ass on your way out. You had one chance to keep the discussion on topic, and I'm good faith.

-3
Michalusmichalus -3 points ago +1 / -4

The projecting fallacies here are so very lame.I don't care you don't like someone else experience. Collecting experience is how enough data is achieved. You are not keeping a bubble.

view more: Next ›