This sterile HR language is telling of an attitude that I believe is a massive problem in our culture even without wokeness. It's a form of credentialism that automatically demeans people in the outgroup in the same way that paramilitary cops start referring to other civilians as "civilians." You look down on them as the great unwashed who will have to pass several moats and walls of arbitrary procedures just to have a real conversation with you, and if they try to climb over those walls then they're guilty of "threatening behavior" and subject to civil and criminal sanctions.
Same phenomenon: Jeff Metcalf tried to talk to the Frisco ISD superintendent for a few minutes, but was told he needed to make an appointment for Monday. Yes Jeff is a stupid boomer, but no one seriously believes the superintendent is actually too busy to talk to him. In fact he is a nobleman, and Jeff is a peasant who must enter the court with the correct procedures.
Obama was the great champion of this ethos, Hillary was the uber steroided version, and Trump is its worst nightmare.
It's much older than Obama. It is the Middle Managerial full scale cultural dominance of society.
It's basically an extension of Technocratic socialism, and political rationalism, from the Progressive era.
I don't even think that the School's HR sees anyone as inferiors, just that proceduralism, credentialism, and legalism allows anyone from ever having to make moral judgements or solve moral dilemmas.
I don't even think that the School's HR sees anyone as inferiors, just that proceduralism, credentialism, and legalism allows anyone from ever having to make moral judgements or solve moral dilemmas.
Exactly this. I had to suffer under the oppressive weight of the "zero tolerance" policies in school. As a kid who got bullied a lot for being weird (got onto computers at 5 and never really socialized much), the policy which was intended to help people like me ended up making things a lot worse. Other kids resented me if teachers found out about things they did because of the punishments. At least a few times I'd get punished myself because they didn't want to even attempt to sort out what had happened for fear of making an error.
People seem to see technology as something which will liberate them from difficult decisions through automation. In actual practice though, impersonal systems can't make reasonable decisions about individual people, and the errors they make can end up being significantly greater than whatever problems they solve.
At least a few times I'd get punished myself because they didn't want to even attempt to sort out what had happened for fear of making an error.
This reminds me of one time in early grade school. I skinned my knee during a lunch break and went inside to have it cleaned up. While I was in there something happened outside (I never did find out what), and I guess none of the adults supervising were really paying attention. So they just bulk punished everyone. I had a pretty obvious alibi (I was literally getting bandaged away from everyone else) but once I came back they still punished me too just because they were punishing everyone.
"Why will AI never replace certain industries like law and governance?"
impersonal systems can't make reasonable decisions about individual people, and the errors they make can end up being significantly greater than whatever problems they solve.
Ironically, that's what all the tech for the last few decades have been getting rid of. Do we need twenty people to design this? No, Steve can do it. He does the entire work of an entire office. The problem is most haven't realized that's what is happening, and those that do are trying to stop it.
A lot of the men getting married and having children in today's society are very weak willed, simpy men that are feminized. They're kind of like steers with their balls chopped off at a spiritual level despite still having balls at a physical level. It's not surprising how the father seems weaker than the mother as this is often the case in modern relationships. The high quality "strong men" are rarely in long term relationships with women these days.
For all the talk of male privlage, part of the issue is that we live in a Matriarchy; a woman will have automatic deference on multiple levels of society, from local(Well, he must have deserved it), state(law enforcement), societal(dating), so on and so forth.
So men trying to influence/control women in any way, shape, or form, unless they have very little impulse control or with a very short time horizon, will have to act knowing that if they step out of line, they will find themselves punished on multiple levels. So, alot of them, wether they want to or not, find themselves automatically adopting feminine strategies(resulting in a lot of pissed off women, whom instinctively hate weak men) to navigate that particular clusterfuck.
The next question is, 'Well, what about men totally ruined by society with nothing to loose', by which I can only gesture helplessly toward the elephant stick paradox.
This. Even some normie social scientists have noticed we live in a matriarchy, and have been for quite some time. Even Jordan Peterson has pointed it out. We live in the long house now.
This. "Alpha men" did not breed. Heartiste, before he lost his site and went to Gab, realized this and nearly lost his mind. Women are choosing for hyper domesticated men now. Gatherers, not hunters. Maybe it is because of the pill and assorted other drugs fucking with their biology. Maybe it is the curse of Eve and Pandora, where women want control so badly they will destroy their own bloodlines to gain it. Maybe women's nature cannot conquer decades of propaganda and so really do choose "beta males" for breeding and relationships. Regardless, most married men and men in relationships nowadays are pretty bitch whipped. Any one remember when the game enthusiasts and Manospherians claimed the beta males would die out and alpha males would take over and drag us into a glorious patriarchy again? Boy were they fucking wrong.
For the record, this actually happens every single time women gain some sort of control over a society. They choose for more and more effeminate and deviant men, men they feel they can control. Then rough men from another world show up and kill everyone due to having no one to stop them. Rinse and repeat throughout history. Contrary to popular belief, the women do not escape this. At this point they become so masculine and deviant that the rough man of another world look upon them and disgust and kill them as well. We see this with the sheer amount of white women that get killed by their partners when they are in relationships with men of other races. The book Bio History describes this very process in broad detail.
Women want a man who is both a bull and a steer but the qualities of a bull and steer are opposing so no man who is both exists. This is why women never seem content and always looking for something better or obsessed with a fictional fantasy of a man because what they truly want doesn't exist.
In nature you get a decent balance because women's situation they find themselves in is such they must end up compromising and sticking to that compromise such that the bulls and steers tend to get a fair mix of the women.
In modern society, our government oppresses bulls and elevates steers such that women are funnelled into an environment in which they choose steers more than bulls but they still "have fun" with the bulls similar to how a rancher might mix the bulls with the female cows once or twice a year for a couple weeks, that's when the women go in heat and cheat on their steer husband with a bull man at some party, at work, or wherever because she tires of her steer and isn't truly attracted to him (dead bedrooms) but she feels compelled to marry one given how society has shaped things.
Men have the same contradiction inside themselves. Evola discusses it to an extent in his metaphysics of sex book. Men want whores/sluts (bulls) and mothers (steers) but the problem is the qualities that make a good one or the other are contradictory so men can never truly get what they want either. Again, in nature you end up with a decent mix but modernity elevated the whores and oppressed the mothers which fucks everything up for men and women also.
The root of all problems is government not women because without government, men with their superior strength, intelligence, competence, discipline, etc... can just force women into what they want and that would be better for women also. It's how nature intended.
The end result with the destabilization of civilizations is just nature's way of healing and returning back to the proper equilibrium.
Sometime before his site was lost, I forget how many months it was and trying to find the post in the archive version of his site is a pain, but he went on about how alpha males were super selfish and weren't breeding. All the kids nowadays were fags and whatnot. Sometime after that he really got into dissident politics and talking about the Jews and the difference between the races, started really noticing... And then his site was removed.
I was with a kid in third grade who pretended he brought a knife to school to look cool, and was expelled the next day and was never seen in the area again because of it. Clearly a chubby 9 year old mutt kid fake bragging is much much worse optics and danger than an actual giant negro who has already killed someone.
But this is also one of those situations where "the powers that be" have already spit in your face, and the community itself must take the action. Refuse your own tainted diploma, make the entire ceremony a laughing stock of mocking Anthony and the school, and do everything possible to make every school member suffer.
Its easy for me to say, of course, but this is a major event they will have to look back on their entire life. They will either remember a time they cucked in front of the entire nation watching, or at least be able to say they tried to do something to stand up for themselves.
After Columbine, goth and metal kids (mostly white) were expelled, put on watchlists, and sent to shrinks for evaluation for 10 years until the panic calmed down.
Whites have a weird overreaction to anything even remotely bad they could possibly, maybe do. You see this most often with white boys, where if even one white boys misbehaves in any fashion every single white boy will be lectured or even punished. Really bizarre, and it has been going on for decades now.
Graduate? I'd be surprised if he can read above a 4th grade level, regardless of how many white kids he murdered with a knife at a track meet in the daytime due to a genetic predisposition for lack of impulse control and violence.
There was a thing a few months ago where a black girl was suing her local school for graduating her despite her inability to read.
Thanks to things like No Child Left Behind, schools are heavily motivated monetarily to fake and pump up test scores so no kids ever fail. Especially the black ones.
They're dangling caramello out there hoping someone pops him. Might even have one of their "known to the fbi" MKUltra subjects carry it out. Create the false flag needed to spark another Summer of Love with "fiery but peaceful" pro-tests.
They are so desperate to increase the number of black graduates on paper they even try to sneak one in after he killed a kid in high profile case. That's how hard it is to get black education numbers up.
"We can't keep calling police on the black kids when they break the law in class because that's one more black we can say didnt break the law in class."
"Mrs. Hanson said Jahkwarius punched her 5 times for telling him to not vape weed in class? Well we can suspend him for 2 days and tell her to duck next time."
This sterile HR language is telling of an attitude that I believe is a massive problem in our culture even without wokeness. It's a form of credentialism that automatically demeans people in the outgroup in the same way that paramilitary cops start referring to other civilians as "civilians." You look down on them as the great unwashed who will have to pass several moats and walls of arbitrary procedures just to have a real conversation with you, and if they try to climb over those walls then they're guilty of "threatening behavior" and subject to civil and criminal sanctions.
Same phenomenon: Jeff Metcalf tried to talk to the Frisco ISD superintendent for a few minutes, but was told he needed to make an appointment for Monday. Yes Jeff is a stupid boomer, but no one seriously believes the superintendent is actually too busy to talk to him. In fact he is a nobleman, and Jeff is a peasant who must enter the court with the correct procedures.
Obama was the great champion of this ethos, Hillary was the uber steroided version, and Trump is its worst nightmare.
It's much older than Obama. It is the Middle Managerial full scale cultural dominance of society.
It's basically an extension of Technocratic socialism, and political rationalism, from the Progressive era.
I don't even think that the School's HR sees anyone as inferiors, just that proceduralism, credentialism, and legalism allows anyone from ever having to make moral judgements or solve moral dilemmas.
Exactly this. I had to suffer under the oppressive weight of the "zero tolerance" policies in school. As a kid who got bullied a lot for being weird (got onto computers at 5 and never really socialized much), the policy which was intended to help people like me ended up making things a lot worse. Other kids resented me if teachers found out about things they did because of the punishments. At least a few times I'd get punished myself because they didn't want to even attempt to sort out what had happened for fear of making an error.
People seem to see technology as something which will liberate them from difficult decisions through automation. In actual practice though, impersonal systems can't make reasonable decisions about individual people, and the errors they make can end up being significantly greater than whatever problems they solve.
This reminds me of one time in early grade school. I skinned my knee during a lunch break and went inside to have it cleaned up. While I was in there something happened outside (I never did find out what), and I guess none of the adults supervising were really paying attention. So they just bulk punished everyone. I had a pretty obvious alibi (I was literally getting bandaged away from everyone else) but once I came back they still punished me too just because they were punishing everyone.
Absolute insanity.
Sounds about right.
"Why will AI never replace certain industries like law and governance?"
Ironically, that's what all the tech for the last few decades have been getting rid of. Do we need twenty people to design this? No, Steve can do it. He does the entire work of an entire office. The problem is most haven't realized that's what is happening, and those that do are trying to stop it.
You would enjoy "The Unaccountability Machine," by Dan Davies. Check it out.
If only Jeff knew there exists a tool that can make people see you right now.
His mom is more based than the dad. makes you wonder if Austin is even his son to begin with
A lot of the men getting married and having children in today's society are very weak willed, simpy men that are feminized. They're kind of like steers with their balls chopped off at a spiritual level despite still having balls at a physical level. It's not surprising how the father seems weaker than the mother as this is often the case in modern relationships. The high quality "strong men" are rarely in long term relationships with women these days.
For all the talk of male privlage, part of the issue is that we live in a Matriarchy; a woman will have automatic deference on multiple levels of society, from local(Well, he must have deserved it), state(law enforcement), societal(dating), so on and so forth.
So men trying to influence/control women in any way, shape, or form, unless they have very little impulse control or with a very short time horizon, will have to act knowing that if they step out of line, they will find themselves punished on multiple levels. So, alot of them, wether they want to or not, find themselves automatically adopting feminine strategies(resulting in a lot of pissed off women, whom instinctively hate weak men) to navigate that particular clusterfuck.
The next question is, 'Well, what about men totally ruined by society with nothing to loose', by which I can only gesture helplessly toward the elephant stick paradox.
This. Even some normie social scientists have noticed we live in a matriarchy, and have been for quite some time. Even Jordan Peterson has pointed it out. We live in the long house now.
This. "Alpha men" did not breed. Heartiste, before he lost his site and went to Gab, realized this and nearly lost his mind. Women are choosing for hyper domesticated men now. Gatherers, not hunters. Maybe it is because of the pill and assorted other drugs fucking with their biology. Maybe it is the curse of Eve and Pandora, where women want control so badly they will destroy their own bloodlines to gain it. Maybe women's nature cannot conquer decades of propaganda and so really do choose "beta males" for breeding and relationships. Regardless, most married men and men in relationships nowadays are pretty bitch whipped. Any one remember when the game enthusiasts and Manospherians claimed the beta males would die out and alpha males would take over and drag us into a glorious patriarchy again? Boy were they fucking wrong.
For the record, this actually happens every single time women gain some sort of control over a society. They choose for more and more effeminate and deviant men, men they feel they can control. Then rough men from another world show up and kill everyone due to having no one to stop them. Rinse and repeat throughout history. Contrary to popular belief, the women do not escape this. At this point they become so masculine and deviant that the rough man of another world look upon them and disgust and kill them as well. We see this with the sheer amount of white women that get killed by their partners when they are in relationships with men of other races. The book Bio History describes this very process in broad detail.
Both men and women love a contradiction.
Women want a man who is both a bull and a steer but the qualities of a bull and steer are opposing so no man who is both exists. This is why women never seem content and always looking for something better or obsessed with a fictional fantasy of a man because what they truly want doesn't exist.
In nature you get a decent balance because women's situation they find themselves in is such they must end up compromising and sticking to that compromise such that the bulls and steers tend to get a fair mix of the women.
In modern society, our government oppresses bulls and elevates steers such that women are funnelled into an environment in which they choose steers more than bulls but they still "have fun" with the bulls similar to how a rancher might mix the bulls with the female cows once or twice a year for a couple weeks, that's when the women go in heat and cheat on their steer husband with a bull man at some party, at work, or wherever because she tires of her steer and isn't truly attracted to him (dead bedrooms) but she feels compelled to marry one given how society has shaped things.
Men have the same contradiction inside themselves. Evola discusses it to an extent in his metaphysics of sex book. Men want whores/sluts (bulls) and mothers (steers) but the problem is the qualities that make a good one or the other are contradictory so men can never truly get what they want either. Again, in nature you end up with a decent mix but modernity elevated the whores and oppressed the mothers which fucks everything up for men and women also.
The root of all problems is government not women because without government, men with their superior strength, intelligence, competence, discipline, etc... can just force women into what they want and that would be better for women also. It's how nature intended.
The end result with the destabilization of civilizations is just nature's way of healing and returning back to the proper equilibrium.
Wait, seriously? I used to read alot of his stuff, and I must have missed that particular character arc.
Sometime before his site was lost, I forget how many months it was and trying to find the post in the archive version of his site is a pain, but he went on about how alpha males were super selfish and weren't breeding. All the kids nowadays were fags and whatnot. Sometime after that he really got into dissident politics and talking about the Jews and the difference between the races, started really noticing... And then his site was removed.
I was with a kid in third grade who pretended he brought a knife to school to look cool, and was expelled the next day and was never seen in the area again because of it. Clearly a chubby 9 year old mutt kid fake bragging is much much worse optics and danger than an actual giant negro who has already killed someone.
But this is also one of those situations where "the powers that be" have already spit in your face, and the community itself must take the action. Refuse your own tainted diploma, make the entire ceremony a laughing stock of mocking Anthony and the school, and do everything possible to make every school member suffer.
Its easy for me to say, of course, but this is a major event they will have to look back on their entire life. They will either remember a time they cucked in front of the entire nation watching, or at least be able to say they tried to do something to stand up for themselves.
After Columbine, goth and metal kids (mostly white) were expelled, put on watchlists, and sent to shrinks for evaluation for 10 years until the panic calmed down.
Have any blacks been treated the same?
Whites have a weird overreaction to anything even remotely bad they could possibly, maybe do. You see this most often with white boys, where if even one white boys misbehaves in any fashion every single white boy will be lectured or even punished. Really bizarre, and it has been going on for decades now.
Well blacks have been shooting up the school for so long people didn't even care to report on it, so nothing had to change.
Graduate? I'd be surprised if he can read above a 4th grade level, regardless of how many white kids he murdered with a knife at a track meet in the daytime due to a genetic predisposition for lack of impulse control and violence.
There was a thing a few months ago where a black girl was suing her local school for graduating her despite her inability to read.
Thanks to things like No Child Left Behind, schools are heavily motivated monetarily to fake and pump up test scores so no kids ever fail. Especially the black ones.
There was a post here about it: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/19AdbqdCef/poc-sues-high-school-for-3-milli/c/
He's black. They will alter paperwork, change grading rules or anything else to get him on the graduation list.
There's a recipe for creating Lone Wolf's.
wolves*
In the old days he would have been hanging by a rope by now. Bring back those days.
should have been by the end of the day he killed austin
When the wife has more balls than the dad
They're dangling caramello out there hoping someone pops him. Might even have one of their "known to the fbi" MKUltra subjects carry it out. Create the false flag needed to spark another Summer of Love with "fiery but peaceful" pro-tests.
Don't get our hopes up like that!
Breaking news: At the same time the tweet was released, Austin's father gave Caramel Jigaboo's whole family head.
If Jeff Metcalf had even a single twig left in his cuck spine, there wouldn't be any question about whether Karmelo was graduating or not.
He can get his prison GED.
They are so desperate to increase the number of black graduates on paper they even try to sneak one in after he killed a kid in high profile case. That's how hard it is to get black education numbers up.
"We can't keep calling police on the black kids when they break the law in class because that's one more black we can say didnt break the law in class."
"Mrs. Hanson said Jahkwarius punched her 5 times for telling him to not vape weed in class? Well we can suspend him for 2 days and tell her to duck next time."