39
LibertyPrimeWasRight 39 points ago +39 / -0

I’m just stunned that the self-insert in their fantasy is “bullying victim.” I’m in awe, really.

15
LibertyPrimeWasRight 15 points ago +15 / -0

It’s so full of insanity. Relating political decisions through high school lenses. “Fun,” “cool,” and “shitty” instead of anything about policy. The glorification of a cop going to someone’s house and beating them with a baseball bat because their kid is mean. Self-inserting as a bullying victim.

Just a what the fuck all around.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, assuming I were in Tommy Robinson’z position and legitimate, I would expect that if I tried to return to the UK at this particular time through any sort of official channel, I would immediately be detained upon arrival. If he wants back in right now, he’ll have to arrange to be smuggled in.

I’m not saying that I don’t have my own doubts/complaints about Robinson, just that—devil’s advocate—it probably isn’t as simple as booking the next British Airways flight to Heathrow or whatever.

4
LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, it would be illegal by any common sense interpretation of the laws. But, it would be done anyway, and then the courts would say no one has standing to challenge it, or come up with an incredibly non common sense way to suggest it could be legal, or, if unable to do that, at least stretch out calling it illegal for about three to five years. At which point they’d go “oops, our bad, I promise we won’t do it again…” and no one involved would face real consequences.

6
LibertyPrimeWasRight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Failure to support representation of your values in media results in the disappearance of your values from media. Since it’s impossible to create a story beyond Dick and Jane reader primer level with no values, the disappearance of your values from media inherently means their substitution with someone else’s. To smugly argue against defending the existence of one’s values in media is dumb. To smugly argue that one should fight against their own values in media is worse than dumb—it is a reprehensible sort of cultural suicide.

That said, I do not extend you the courtesy of believing that you are merely a smug, dumb, culturally-suicidal fool. I strongly suspect there are values you’d be perfectly comfortable seeing defended and promoted in media, and that they are likely quite close to the evil being mocked here.

6
LibertyPrimeWasRight 6 points ago +6 / -0

He's a coward and a grifter but he's not a committed leftist.

He's on twitter retweeting takes from Stephen King about Trump's trial. He may not be the driver of the leftist rot, but I doubt he disagrees with it.

24
LibertyPrimeWasRight 24 points ago +24 / -0

Honestly, I find this article disappointing. It speaks about events in 2017, 2019, 2020 as "how Wikipedia was infiltrated and subverted," but in truth it's just recounting the moment that some of the people and cliques who had been accruing power there for a long time went slightly more mask off. The earliest red flag it mentions is financial association with a left-wing donor group as of 2016, but it doesn't cover anything about how they came to be associated.

Anyone here who remembers Wikipedia's coverage of Gamergate should know that it already had a heavily leftist bent as of 2014, and I am certain that's not the beginning of the story either. Looking at Jimmy Wales himself, I would suggest that it was never "subverted." Rather, it was run by leftists from its inception, and only became more extreme as they themselves did.

36
LibertyPrimeWasRight 36 points ago +36 / -0

it will be easier to create a faggot with 10 different butt buddies than make a straight male and find him a wife to start a family

EA accidentally taking the bold stance of correctly portraying faggot promiscuity.

9
LibertyPrimeWasRight 9 points ago +9 / -0

Even if it’s true, I’m sure it’s her being a moron. Maybe it was empty because it was closed, or reserved? It was apparently in a luxury hotel, so maybe they didn’t meet the dress code? Who knows. Almost certainly not racism (and even if it was, I support the restaurant’s right to be racist).

6
LibertyPrimeWasRight 6 points ago +6 / -0

painting Fox as 'far right' and all that, when Trump went and debated Biden on CNN.

Ah, but see, CNN is moderate and Fox News is far right by comparison. So Trump met Biden on a neutral platform, and now he’s demanding Kamala meet him in a space that’s biased against her.

That’s how the lefties see it, anyway. And they will declare it over and over, because it’s important everyone else see it that way too.

20
LibertyPrimeWasRight 20 points ago +20 / -0

That’s not full Imp. That’s a normal position among certain sections of the right. Full Imp would be to ascribe nearly infinite cunning, coordination, and malice to women. A full Imp position on this would probably be that she made that statement because the fempire still wishes to wield trannies as a weapon or something.

by Lethn
6
LibertyPrimeWasRight 6 points ago +6 / -0
  1. If you’re talking about some sort of victim privacy law that prevents the media from reporting ages, then it seems like the information has already leaked. And the fact that you didn’t say “that’s unconfirmed,” or “that’s speculative,” even after running defense about it not being confirmed Islamic, makes me think you believe that what the guy you’re replying to said is correct. Also, you’re not a media organization, so why not be clear about the ages?

  2. If the law also prevents you as a private citizen from communicating what you believe to be the case, honestly, I think you’re already fucked in general just by posting here if anyone investigates your account and links it to you IRL, so, again, why not be clear about the ages?

  3. If this law prevents you from communicating clearly in general, yeah, I guess you’re doing a great job following it. Thanks.

3
LibertyPrimeWasRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

If he really is Indian, he’s not going to notice one more bag of flaming shit.

3
LibertyPrimeWasRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good for him. I wonder if playing Joffrey made it easier to walk away—I imagine he had to worry about perpetually being “the character the audience hates” in his future roles, after all.

12
LibertyPrimeWasRight 12 points ago +12 / -0

I figure you can assume most actors are creepy weirdos and be right more than half the time. Of course, that rule would probably also apply to John Wesley Shipp as well.

More seriously, I haven’t heard anything about either of them being creepy, no. I’m guessing OP’s title refers to Ezra Miller, from the recent movie(s), who is definitely a creepy weirdo.

16
LibertyPrimeWasRight 16 points ago +16 / -0

You can take the Hutu out of the jungle, but you shouldn’t.

3
LibertyPrimeWasRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Technically “The Woman King” counts, if you don’t mind an anti-historical lionization of a monstrous evil.

6
LibertyPrimeWasRight 6 points ago +6 / -0

used as tree decorations.

I don't know, I'm not into severed limbs as a neighborhood decorating motif. Sounds unpleasant.

2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Dig" still works for pirates, given the buried treasure motif.

4
LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOTR level world building included!

Frieren is good, but there’s no way this isn’t an exaggeration.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›