23
Kienan 23 points ago +24 / -1

With this, he'll comment, make a excuse, maybe shit the blame onto the community instead of himself and then back to business as usual.

Yup, that's my prediction, and I haven't been wrong yet on this.

2
Kienan 2 points ago +3 / -1

I did post an update in the comments; I did in fact miss his first ban, because I'd sorted by comments, and it was a post.

In my opinion it doesn't make it any better, since it was still a classic Dom spergout, and he claimed btbw saying "crying out in pain" meant that he "asserted that hooliganism is an inherent aspect of jews."

Absolute fucking nonsense. I've said worse, as have many people here.

7
Kienan 7 points ago +11 / -4

A correction, as I did miss some mod activity, and thus get a few details wrong...but I also found more fuckery.

First correction: Dom did leave a comment on btbw's comment, and it didn't show up in my view. Doesn't change things too much, but is worth pointing out.

I missed the earlier interaction with btbw, because I had sorted by comments.

This whole post was removed, presumably for the "crying out in pain" title, which resulted in the initial 128 ban. This was the linked content.

Dom deemed this "debatable" (lol, double standards much?), and stated that btbw "asserted that hooliganism is an inherent aspect of jews."

Also, a bunch more comments removed with no explanation. Here's three of many:

https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/199hXCeNY0/x/c/4ZGSMAoNzpw/

https://unscored.arete.network/c/KotakuInAction2/p/199hXCeef9/x/c/4ZGSMAm8aVc/

https://unscored.arete.network/c/KotakuInAction2/p/199hSgCxke/x/c/4ZGSMAhaj72/

So, yeah, I wanted to be fair and accurate...but this doesn't make Dom's behavior any better. Arguably it makes it even worse.

27
Kienan 27 points ago +27 / -0

Right? That's kind of the most staggering part; that there's evidence.

How fucking retarded do you have to be to put something like that in writing?

1
Kienan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. But they do know what they implied, and in fact doubled down on it. They want to delete the orphans, because it's not killing if you do it before they're born, and that's better for the orphans and society, or some shit.

They're genocidal eugenic utopianists...and don't even realize it.

15
Kienan 15 points ago +15 / -0

Olbermann, one of Trump’s most vocal critics...

That's one way to put it. "Raving lunatic" being another.

10
Kienan 10 points ago +10 / -0

That explains some things; she must have gained some demonic powers (such as still being semi-relevant), after all those sacrifices.

22
Kienan 22 points ago +22 / -0

Nice to see any pushback at all on CNN, but I wish this "transphobic" guy had just said 'nope, people are sick of it, we're just going to tell the truth again.'

I was curious, and looked this guy up; Shermichael Singleton. One of the top results was him getting accused by CNN of racism...against blacks.


The other guy, Jay Michaelson, is a real piece of work. From Wikipedia:

Michaelson is a rabbi and openly gay. He was a professional religious LGBTQ activist...His 2009 book God vs. Gay? The Religious Case for Equality was...Other LGBTQ-focused work includes the chapter on Exodus in the Queer Bible Commentary...

Since 2013, Michaelson's journalistic work has focused largely on the Supreme Court, religion, and LGBT issues...his article "There are a lot of Jews in Hollywood. Let a Rabbi Explain Why...

In addition to covering the Supreme Court, he has written on climate change, antisemitism, voter suppression, judicial nominations, and other subjects, and has been featured on CNN, MSNBC, and Meet the Press.

What a walking meme.

In 2013, Michaelson wrote the first long-form report on the right-wing religious exemptions movement, Redefining Religious Liberty: The Covert Campaign Against Civil Rights.

You fuckers did it first. Not my fault you redefined "Civil Rights" and then used it to wage a covert campaign against individual freedoms, religious and otherwise. Projection, they name is Leftist.

Michaelson was listed in the Forward 50 list of the most influential American Jews in 2009.

No comment.

Michaelson married Paul Dakin in 2011.[47] They had a child when Michaelson was 46.[48]

Not sure how two dudes had a child, and it doesn't elaborate. The headline of the article linked in [48] is "JD Vance’s weird ideas about parenthood: a Jewish critique," and in it it says his daughter was "born." Some of his related articles were good too; "When American values are Jewish values," and "How Biden embodies Jewish concepts of strength."

From the "Jewish values" article:

No, it is not the Jewish way to inflame anger, distort truth, deny science and stand with America Firsters and Christian Nationalists

Again...no comment.

In the "Jewish concepts of strength" article:

In encouraging an outmoded embrace of masculinity, Trump has fashioned a hollow fascimile of strength

Hahaha.

And I'd list some more from the JD Vance article, but this is long enough. But there's some crazy shit there.

Two tweets of his to round things out:

It is really hard to comprehend how almost half of American voters prefer Trump's ignorant, illiterate blustering to these dignified, reasonable, statesmanlike words. [2020 tweet, on Trump v Biden. Context: tweet he quoted.]

No surprise: #SCOTUS votes 6-3 that a supposedly voluntary but actually semi-mandatory prayer at football games is not only constitutional, but also protected speech that must be allowed. [2022 tweet]

I won't get into this, because this is already way too long, but...it's just wrong, and a flat-out misrepresentation, of course.


Oh and, for the record, I didn't want to make this about him being Jewish. We get enough of that here and, while I'm totally willing to talk about it, I try not to be the first to bring it up, because that gets way old. Not my fault this guy is the Jewiest Jew to ever Jew, though.

17
Kienan 17 points ago +17 / -0

This gay Rabbi looks like the type of "person" who not only touches kids - boys, of course - but has dead ones in his sex dungeon basement. He'd also take the cowards way out, if ever exposed.

He rubs his nipples.

All allegedly, of course. Except the nipple thing. This dude definitely rubs his nipples.

5
Kienan 5 points ago +5 / -0

10k is just the base Social Blade increment at that level, it looks like, and I think it is rollover, and x,x10,000 -1 may be recorded as a 10k loss.

Because I don't think Matt is losing 1k every other week, and that's what SB says: https://socialblade.com/youtube/c/skagg3

And, damn, is he throttled hard. Social Blade isn't the most scientific, but it sets his FIVE YEAR prediction at current rates as still under 300k. He'll gain 20k subs...while more than doubling his viewership. Again, SB isn't the best, but that's kind of odd.

For Pakman, I suppose some weirdness is possible, but he's also pretty damn large, so any sort of swing - and leftists are certainly fickle - would show up.

11
Kienan 11 points ago +11 / -0

This guy is such an absolute fucking tool.

He's always been a propagandist, but Trump (and his Democrat handlers) really broke him. He was never amazing, but he used to be more than an obvious liar spinning everything in the most dishonest, disgusting ways. He was always a joke...now he's the punchline.

Also, hilarious to hear this guy whine. Go to his YT channel, sort by "Popular." It's almost all from 9-12 years ago.

Also, he's been flat for a year, likely much longer. He had a big spike in July/August...and has pretty much been slipping since. Social Blade archive and live. Now, that's growth, so that is still adding subscribers, but you can see the rate fluctuate. And, no, it's not unheard of to lose subscribers, obviously...ask anyone who makes a big fool of themselves.

Pakman makes your average leftist look honest.

5
Kienan 5 points ago +5 / -0

I made the comparison in another thread, but it cracks me up that babies are clumps of sells...and an aluminum block is an assault rifle.

One will naturally develop into a born, living human. The other just sits there unless acted upon.

5
Kienan 5 points ago +5 / -0

guns are sometimes not effective with the adult ones.

Which is absolutely metal as fuck. Hippos, man, what the heck.

20
Kienan 20 points ago +20 / -0

...do you think people would put two and two together...

I'mma stop you right there...

16
Kienan 16 points ago +16 / -0

"You should have just let us kill the babies. We would have left the pets alone...unless you have guns." - Progressives Demons.

22
Kienan 22 points ago +22 / -0

Moo Deng more accurate than @AllanLichtman

The @ just makes it even more brutal. Get 'im!

10
Kienan 10 points ago +10 / -0

This simple little comic enrages me so much, because it's true. In fact, it barely scratches the surface. They didn't even touch on treatment of the sexes; the erasure of femininity and the proliferation of insufferable girlbosses, and the erasure of masculinity and the proliferation of New Men.

I'm sick of it all. Thankfully, they can't get rid of the old stuff. Also, people are getting sick of their nonsense, and it seems like the profitability of this bullshit is starting to wane.

17
Kienan 17 points ago +17 / -0

Most importantly...Trump's people would have been the same 2016 people who backstabbed, hobbled, and were generally treasonous, and Trump wouldn't have known better.

Giving him four years to stew was probably for the best. Who really got a grasp of just what DC is like, and how evil some of these people are. Hopefully he has learned from that, and has a much more interesting and impactful term this time.

As for the main question, 2024...would it matter? I doubt it would be better than Trump 47.

No matter how people feel about Trump, or if he's underwhelming, God Emperor, or whatever...as far as the current system and Overton window get, I think Punished Trump might be just about the best we can get. And if he does a good job, that will push things more, so we can continue the trend of improving things. If Trump had won 2020, not only would Trump 20 be inferior to Trump 24, but the Republican candidate in '24 might very well have been a partial/full neocon. They were already trying to slide back; if Trump wasn't running for election again, and if he hadn't been taught a very practical lesson about who these people are, the party may very well have backslid.

16
Kienan 16 points ago +16 / -0

What's really, really exciting is, this is after he won. Unless I'm misunderstanding. Is this new, or an old ad that is being resurfaced? ([Ninja] edit: at least according to one person, this is 2023.)

If new...this isn't Campaign Trump, this is President Trump. He's not appealing for votes...he doesn't need them anymore. He's saying what he wants to do. Which means he probably actually does intend to do this. Hot diggitiy damn.

A bunch of this is great. I like #4, and many others.

Not sure how I feel about the last one; I've heard pros and cons. Term limits sound great in theory, until you realize that, if not done with extreme care, it just gives more power to the staffers and "Permanent Washington." I like the idea of fresh blood, but it also means more potential power in the hands of unelected people, since the elected people are getting shuffled more, and you have more people who don't know what they're doing. On the other hand, you can't make things much worse, so I guess give it a shot. Most of the old-timers are some of the worst anyway, so terming them out and letting the people elect new representatives might be for the best.

7
Kienan 7 points ago +7 / -0

Cool it with the extremism, man!

If the media actually did their job, that would be letting the people telling them to do their job win. And those people are garbage deplorables. The only way to keep truly Good, is to keep being propagandists, obviously!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›