It's not about the country, it's about White people specifically. They'll love America once all the Whites are gone.

What's holding you back? Maybe I can help.

This would be a good sign IF it was targeted specifically at non-Whites only. The problem is that studies show this sort of mentality actually has a significant (and it's very significant) impact on White women who view White men in a negative light while simultaneously looking to fuck black men. The end result is never good for any of the White people (the men who get passed up and treated poorly by White women or the White women who get abused by the black men).

Olbermann suffers from a mild case of celiac disease,[133] as well as restless legs syndrome.[7] In August 1980, he also suffered a head injury while leaping onto a New York City Subway train.[134] This head injury permanently upset his equilibrium, resulting in his avoidance of driving.

Sounds like the head injury upset more than just his "equilibrium".

No, there's plenty of real fascists that identify as fascists. From my experience, they're usually Catholic because they see Catholicism and Fascism as being more compatible than National Socialism and Catholicism. Also, a lot of non-White people that are sympathetic to NatSoc values will call themselves fascist over NatSoc. The Third Positionists also exist.

This guy, imo, comes off pretty fed-like but not everyone is a fed, obviously.

• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel
• Israel

So, according to the holohoax museum, Israel is fascist. Got it.

Can you imagine all the men she likely mistreated because she thought she was oppressed as a woman or whatever BS? Likely a lesbian ofc.

Having sympathy would be the natural response but I can't be sympathetic toward these people. Her decision was selfish and she's only upset because she's not happy over her decision. She probably has no remorse whatsoever about all the people she would have hurt during her whole period of time. There was probably a family member who tried to stop her that she vilified and she won't apologize to that person and probably still thinks that person is bad. Fuck all these people. Trannies deserve 0 sympathy. 41% is too low.

Sar what you mean sar. I just got my citizenship, I am Canadian sar.

The Japanese government has been captured by the same enemies who've captured ours. The average Japanese person has no say in anything. Democracy is a lie.

I'd actually love a Hindu not Sikh Prime Minister. They tend to be very Indian nationalist and hate Muslims. It's be nice seeing them just implement obviously Indian favoritism policies and anti-Muslim policies hurting Canada's "multiculturalism". Canadians deserve it.

View from the Right, Volume I: Heritage and Foundations by Alain de Benoist

Yup. I've only known 2 actual real "scientists" in my life who I would say were exceptionally smart and competent at science. One of them worked in weapons research for South Korea and one of them worked in weapons research for the USA. Of course, what they worked in was never expressively said but that's what anyone would assume given the details.

I have a book from the 1970s that discusses how this was going on back then and how scientists were scared of losing their jobs if they didn't report the right results so a lot of stuff never got published.

People are just waking up to it because of covid but it has been going on since the beginning. Most of the "science" out there is gamed. Reproducibility is a huge problem in most fields except hard sciences and in hard sciences the problem is often that many people lack the expensive equipment to reproduce even if they wanted to so the data is usually just checked to make sure it makes sense given current theoretical beliefs which means a lot of hard science could be fake too if the theoretical stuff is wrong.

So much of science is a scam. Everything is fake and gay.

ESPN is owned by Disney. Of course they decided to try to make it all strong woman.

If Trump was even halfway as good as he's made out to be by journalists, he'd be great but he's not even 1/10 of what they make him out to be. He's a Shabbos Goy sellout. We lose no matter who wins.

I wonder if White women like black women because black women treat White women similar to how White women want to be treated by White men but the White men are too oppressed to be able to properly put White women in their place like a black woman can do.

People have the wrong idea about protests. A lot of protests are essentially "sanctioned" by the government with governments (intelligence agencies) actually funding and initiating some protests. These protests get news coverage and are promoted as being a part of the "democratic system". In reality, protesting in the manner in which the leadership didn't want has never been allowed but the average person doesn't understand this.

If you're going to protest a position that is actually truly against what the government wants, you run the risk of prison/death/total life destruction so if you are going to protest you should only do it if you're willing to go all the way. If you're willing to go all the way then you shouldn't even be protesting because there's far more effective "all-in" things you could be doing rather than protesting.

Thus, the only logical conclusion someone should come to is that protesting is entirely worthless and it's just playing with fire for absolutely nothing to gain.

We don't need to sterilize people under 90 IQ. The real issue we need to focus on is creating a "system" or "structure" if you would call it that in which smarter/superior men were the men who would be the most likely to procreate without having to force the eugenics.

This can be accomplished by abolishing the entire welfare system including healthcare and subsequently lowering taxes then abolishing the civil rights act to allow discrimination. I would even go further and implementing a constitutional amendment that allows discrimination as a human right rather than the opposite of disallowing it so States can't make it illegal to discriminate. The reason for this is not to discriminate against the other races but rather to allow discrimination toward women. With the deportations you suggest (all non-Whites, most especially jews should be deported with the assets of jews expropriated), that would create an overall effect in society that was naturally eugenic without having to force it. The truth of the matter is not everyone deserves a high wage nor does everyone need to be intelligent in the society. You'll always get deviations from the mean and that's fine because we will still need below average peasants to work below average jobs.

He has a few interesting points but I don't fully buy it.

The knowledge half-life making parenting harder is true and many have experienced these effects first hand but there's more to this story than a knowledge half-life. The issue isn't actually a lack of knowledge but more like a lack of proper knowledge. Much of the knowledge the average person has grown up with was false to begin with and the flimsy societal framework that kept the lie alive is dying thanks to the significant social changes we've had. What is happening is that we're actually starting to rediscover truths about things where previous generations had believed lies. "Relationships" are actually a very good example of this. Female nature and male nature has not changed since recorded history and you can actually go back to the beginning of recorded history and find men who've written knowledge about men and women that would be more valuable and useful to young men or women today to understand than any of the conventional "knowledge" these young people's parents likely have on the subject. That's not because of the half-life of knowledge, that's because the knowledge the parents thought they had was faulty in the first place.

Think about knowledge regarding anything to do with human systems (relationships for example) as being based on knowledge of genetics and then knowledge of environmental factors influencing genetics which then leads to specific outcomes given the genetic and environmental factors. Much of the knowledge that people pass around to others like parent to child involved the parents not understanding the current environment nor the genetic factors such that the parent merely tells the child what to do to get the outcome the child wants under environmental factors that no longer exist. If the parent instead taught the child the genetic factors and then taught the child knowledge of how exactly changes in environmental factors lead to different outcomes given the genetics, then a child can use this knowledge to properly apply to the environment in which the child knows. This is "real" knowledge and most people don't have it. The average person in this world doesn't have real knowledge. In fact many people are taught false ideas about reality such that much of the advice they spew is worthless. Yet, you can go back thousands of years and find the knowledge that I've just described that is just as applicable today as it was back then.

His example of lack of being able to run a business is also false. The fundamentals of how to run a business have no changed and will not change. Any time in history that people think the fundamentals have changed ends up coming back to bite whomever thought that. Wages don't go up because the supply/demand relationship for wages have not changed in a manner that leads to higher wages. The cost to train employees actually has no barring on direct impact on wages of employees. It would only have an impact on wages if the cost of training made the industry overall less profitable which led to less investment and thus less demand for jobs which would depress wages. This likely goes on to an extent, so he's not entirely wrong in this sense. The lack of specialized, superiorly skilled employees being in demand does lower wages but this is a problem with technology itself and it was always the point of technology. Instead of a highly skilled White men (yes this is a rare and gender issue) being the only people capable of a specific job because of the competence required, we now have Indian women that can do the same job at a level that is good enough for the business so you've increased the supply of the labor immensely. This has little to do with the knowledge half-life he talks about but the knowledge half-life is a contributing factor but what he needs to understand is corporations are doing this ON PURPOSE. Corporations realized that having highly skilled specialized employees was costly because these employees could demand higher pay so business have been purposely working to reduce the competency needed of their staff while also ensuring if anyone is specialized it's some sort of proprietary specialty that isn't transferable to other businesses. This allows the employer to pay as little as possible. This is what companies truly discuss in closed doors at the higher ups. Even without the knowledge half-life we'd be seeing depressed wages. Governments are pouring in immigrants and companies are spending billions of dollars into researching how to keep your wages as low as possible.

The solution to the knowledge half-life in business is to eliminate income and payroll taxes then ban immigration. Right now "capital" is taxed less than labor which creates an incentive for companies to continue to purchase "technology", the very technology companies use to try to diminish the labor expertise required to run the businesses. This has the two pronged effect of lowering demand for jobs directly while also increasing the supply of any one job because more people are now capable of doing it this lowering wages on average across the board. If you eliminated income and payroll taxes this would give more incentive for businesses to use better skilled labor instead of technology where available. It would have a somewhat minor effect because something technology is definitely superior but it would at least equal the playing field and stop giving incentive to companies to use technology at every turn even when they really shouldn't be. The banning of immigration would have the most profound impact on wages but you can't expect a good outcome without also taxing expatriation of profits and taxing foreign profits and having good tariffs to ensure domestic production stays competitive with foreign production.

My prediction is that Kamala wins. I think it doesn't matter who wins.

I honestly would have a hard time trusting anyone with a hyphenated last name either. Means his genetics come from a line of a feminist and weak-man.

Changing names is a very common tactic certain groups of people do when they try to market a popular figurehead to the masses.

AfD is extremely gynocratic so I doubt that'll get much traction. The only real group of people that are anti-women or pro-men are maybe the Fuentes peeps.

Check who funds Tommy Robinson. Take a guess before you check. You guessed right.

Female correctional officers shouldn't even exist.