Reminds me of reddit. Someone asks a question on reddit. I give the actual real answer. Downvoted. Suspended. Banned.
What I meant is more in the sense of balance of probabilities. You've been presented with evidence she's a jew but the evidence isn't entirely rock solid because there's no archive but her comment does seem to align with another comment you know was true. It's also a weirdly illogical comment that doesn't seem likely to have been faked because a faker would have probably been more direct so the evidence is good but not sound.
Therefore, you have to conclude she either is or isn't, though you could say "unknown". Still, based on how she has behaved given the evidence, I think it's enough to conclude she is jewish but that's my opinion ofc and there's really nothing 100%. There never truly is 100% solid evidence since she could be making up her own words too or was lied to by her parents about her ancestry also.
If it talks, walks, acts like a duck, it's a duck.
I agree too that all women carry the "spark of feminism" which is why expecting women to act "based" is a fool's errand. The rules of society must be designed to keep women in line rather than expect them to willingly act the way one wants them to. But that's for a different topic.
Even though I'm antisemitic, I occasionally find jews hot, sometimes more so than a lot of White women. Lauren Southern was pretty and she was saying stuff men wanted to hear so I sympathize with your disappointment.
No, I don't. I just found it here.
https://ancient-forums.com/threads/lauren-southern-alt-right-whatever.18236/
Sometimes when it comes to things like this instead of looking for irrefutable evidence which one might not get, we can just take the wisdom from the bible: " You will know them by their fruits."
I get it. You like the guy. I wasn't trying to do a whole bio on him. Just enough context for the situation to matter for those unaware.
Yeah, she is. She once admitted she had Jewish heritage but isn't religiously Jewish so she's Jewish. Also, her real name is Simonson not Southern I believe.
Makes sense they fell for each other.
Property taxes are another type of tax that needs to be discussed as entirely immoral like an unrealized capital gains tax.
If you own property and say grow your own food with solar panels for energy off-grid with well water access, why are you forced to earn an income to pay taxes to the government otherwise you lose your house? It's a form of indentured servitude and serfdom. It forces you to always be engaging in the system to earn money to pay taxes to the government.
All taxes except tariffs and consumption taxes should be abolished.
Well, a smart company would have a report button that's 100% a placebo. It does nothing and goes off to no-where land. Maybe an automated message saying "thanks for the report, we've dealt with the matter now" even though nothing happened.
The "report" button needs to be removed from these large communities. Illegal content can be searched for using algorithms to detect much illegal content. Non-illegal content doesn't need to be reported. Block buttons exist. Leftists need to be encouraged to block people they don't like rather than report them.
Man writes romance novel = woman is saved and protected by man
Woman writes romance novel = woman is raped and abused by man
Feminists: "Men are the problem"
Uh huh...
I kind of phrased this badly. We probably agree in the end. I'm just trying to say that any problem we have involving humans has as one of its factors impacting the dynamic of the problem as being "human nature" is the same.
The ancients didn't have the problem of determining what the correct speed limit is in a neighborhood but the ancients did have people who would have believed putting the speed limit low enough to maximize government revenue is ideal, people that would have wanted to minimize accidents, people that would have wanted to minimize road traffic noise because they live near where the speed limit is being place, people who believe the limits should balance the maximization of the flow of traffic while minimizing and people injured through accidents, people who wanted limits to minimize road maintenance and people against speed limits altogether.
All the human elements involved between different people's trying to maximize their interests and perspectives regarding the problem of speed limits in modernity are the same human elements that existed for the ancients.
So yes, the exact nature of our problems differ than the ancients but the human component of all these problems has stayed the same.
I've spent a lot of time studying ancient Greece and Rome. The more I've learned about them the more I realized they had more wisdom than us in a lot of ways but also lacked wisdom just like us in a lot of ways. The similarities between us and the ancients is unmistakable though. We just have different technology. Anyone who thinks humanity has "evolved" or "progressed" compared to the past is sorely mistaken. We're exactly the same. All our problems are exactly the same.
I said Trump would win.
This is my entertainment. I'm warning you now so I can be right over the next 4 years. I enjoy being right. And if I'm proven wrong, that's even better!
The theatre you mean? I don't like humiliating myself by voting.
I won't do anything. It's already game over. I'm just enjoying the decline as best I can.
Exactly. So 4 more years. Nothing changes. Everyone thinks voting will save them. It won't. Game over.
She makes a very strong argument for why we need to abolish all those programs.
To be quite honest, Trump winning should send stocks down. Tariffs will hurt major multinational companies even if the net overall impact is that the average American is better off. Remember, Wall Street and Main Street don't always move in lockstep.
But everytime there is change, people are harmed so how does that work?
I'm just saying historically whenever there's a violent revolution there's usually rich people from the government involved. That's usually because they'll have the resources to be able to make a real stand on a hill and then people will follow along with being able to promote enough propaganda to get significant support.
The peasant classes rarely if ever have risen up entirely on their own unless it was a matter of life or death.
But also, it's rare for radical changes to occur in government without the use of force. The use of force doesn't necessarily need to mean significant violence but the threat of it can be enough as well like when militaries execute coups, they can often be minimal in the amount of violence used.
You don't get a critical mass of people if everyone is scared of using violence. That's why many people encourage violence before the critical mass to try to get a critical mass. No one suggests standing on a hill by themselves but you're never going to get a hill full of people of not one person is willing to stand on the hill. Though, to be fair, you only get a critical mass of people when there's no food, water and electricity. Or if the government is involved.
A lot of radical feminists hate the fact men have superior strength than them. A lot of radical feminism can be reduced down to a fear of men's ability to dominate them physically. Radical feminists can't accept the differences between men and women. Women have advantage they can employ over men which is what dom/sub can be compared to or ying/yang and other elements. Women have the ability to employ their strengths to hack men's brain but radical feminists absolutely despise the need to employ these strategies as many of them are bad at it compared to other women and resent needing to do anything because of a man.
In any case black men seem far more intimidating than White men when weighing just the physicality. Women don't really understand fighting IQ, actual strength, tempered aggression, strategy, etc... they just see the basis aggression and physical size. Blacks are at the top of the chain for men that must be eliminated for making radical feminists scared of men.
The reason these women hate black men is not the same as the reason a conventional White male racist would dislike black men. These women just want to hate on men and blacks seem apex for what they hate, whereas White men dislike blacks because they see them as inferior and a detriment to society, in part because of the same reasons radical feminists hate them but it's different.
It's a shame so many plebs will likely completely miss the distinction.