I don't actually think fluoride in the water is actually as serious as people think it is, but it really doesn't need to be in there if we had, I don't know, clean water and working pipes.
Maybe instead of putting fluoride in the water we should repair our infrastructure.
Has it taken a thousand years for the Anglos and Saxons to become English? Has it taken a thousand years for the Boer to stop being Dutch?
This is my issue, modern transportation isn't going anywhere, society isn't going to revert to the stone age (in fact such collapses almost never happen in all of human history, and typically only happen in highly isolated societies or societies that are already filled with people partly in the stone age. Even then, as you mentioned "modern transportation"; the roads themselves tend to remain.
Due to interconnectedness, and no regulation against ethnic intermarriage, I'd suspect a self-evident American ethnic group is likely in less than 200 years.
And again, ethnic groups are not just larger genetic groups, but cultural groups as well.
To be honest, this makes more sense, and would seem like the exact kind of misdirection that a Leftist would pull against a monarchy. Like when the Left were screaming about "Queen Elizabeth something something slave trade! Be glad that she's dead!"
I don't know if that's still true, or if that's just generalized incompetence, or if that incompetence is coming from the basis of having a left-wing government.
If you're going by the archaic method, there's several more: Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid, Orientaloid, Americanoid, and Australianoid(?).
That being said, those aren't based in biological reality, so you're going to have to accept them as political constructs, or use a different mechanism. But yeah, for sure, they ain't ethnicities.
Well, sort of. I'd say what you're describing is Marxist-Leninism. However, Marxist-Leninism is so crazy, so violent, kills so many people, and so divorced from reality that even Lenin had to come to some terms that it didn't work. Lenin always complained about the Socialist Intelligentsia who never seemed to have a real grasp of understanding power or how to wield it, and even worse, always sought to fulfill the Marxist prophecy rather than act with aggression to conquer anyone that stood in their way.
Fascism actually recognizes the limits of the Marxist Dialectical framework, and seeks to create the revolutionary outcomes of Rousseau and Socialism, while being encumbered by some amount of reality. You can't govern the economy from a single desk, so you intentionally create a ruling oligopoly between state, labor, and business; then you require each of them to be members of the party. You accept that dissent may exist, but you always keep it too terrorized to object. You accept that the "Socialist New Man" will not exist until you raise the children yourself, and indoctrinate them into war. Then, you recognize that your goal is conquest, not "something something and then the workers uprise, question mark, profit."
Fabian Socialism is the most explicitly inauthentic form of Socialism, but because it always seeks subversion, persuasion, and slow marching, it (again) limits itself to reality long enough to make Socialism seem practical. But it's inauthenticity (which is purely tactical) drives the revolutionaries up a wall.
Abortion is legal if the mother's life is in jeopardy in all 50 states and no one has made any utterance to change that.
A federal abortion ban would require the overturning of the supreme court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade.
It's all dishonest retardation with no basis in reality.
Tired of this shit. Anyone got the full quote in context?
/u/Mpetey123 & u/Shill4Hire I found it: https://rumble.com/v5loynn-full-speech-president-trump-holds-a-rally-in-lititz-pa-11324.html?start=2293
Basically, he's complaining about the security arrangements. The glass barriers are set up in such a way that it's fucking up how he looks on camera, and from the audience, but not from actual long-range shooters from places that aren't controlled by the USSS. He actually makes this joke about other people he knows in the audience.
Good ones are interactable, while bad ones are novels with pictures.
I don't think that's a qualitative difference, I think it's a foundational one. I think that's actually giving it the attributes of a "game".
As for the games, I think this will (again) be sorted out with the next inevitable gaming crash.
Yes. Fundamentally, AI can't do an end-run around The Halting Problem, and constructing a game at will or as you play it is simply impossible. But, it can make your life easier if you ask it simple questions.
Because it absolutely grinds the gears of other race haters that I understand ethnicity, and I reject race hatred in all it's forms. They'd rather silence someone opposing race hatred generally, then keep race hatred going to use in gaining recruits and polarization.
A Leftist Shithole organization like Amnesty International is objecting to a Leftist leader's treason law?
It must be pretty bad.
Amnesty International doesn't say shit about people imprisoned for speech or protest in the west when morally inferior rightoids complain about their kids getting raped, or make jokes about how the government doesn't take seriously their kids getting raped.