25
Galean 25 points ago +25 / -0

Communism is bad no matter who is in charge. You can't have communism and allow freedom of speech, freedom to make money or to own a house and relies on indoctrination and fear to maintain power. Communism can't have an alternative or it is not going to work on any large scale.

Communism is tolerated because people are willing to give up their freedom if things are good but it is still an abusive relation that is being forced.

43
Galean 43 points ago +43 / -0

So armed guards in schools? I'm not sure where they want to go with that idea.

24
Galean 24 points ago +24 / -0

Are we pretending that communism wasn't implemented/ existed? Communism was evil because it was evil, it was an authoritarian hellhole where you could not have unapproved opinions, you had no freedom on how to spend your money, constant monitoring by the state and you could not own your own house. Liberalism is guilty of being infiltrated by communism and moving us towards the same ideals but with the added benefit of mass immigration - meaning there is no turning back.

12
Galean 12 points ago +12 / -0

This was also on linkedin. But the discussion was more around you don't need Harvard rather then if he was black he would have been called the next Steve Jobs by everyone and Harvard would have bent over backwards to get him.

Remember when a black girl made a wrapper over google maps so that it showed just the home address. She got interviews and was praised as the next Einstein.

22
Galean 22 points ago +22 / -0

My wife went to an "women in tech" conference recently. Adolescence was recommended.

Odd that women in tech is actually just feminist propaganda, almost nothing about actual tech was discussed.

50
Galean 50 points ago +50 / -0

The point is not to appeal to women but to not appeal to men. After all this years am I suppose to pretend that feminism in gaming was anything else except hating men?

1
Galean 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the ideal insurance company from the perspective of the customer? What is the ideal insurance company from the perspective of the stockholder?

The point would be that the insurance needs to be useful, bad insurance policies can tank a company. So ideal would be one that offers good / great service while also being expensive enough as to bring in profits.

1
Galean 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was just asking about the formula. I understand the idea of being in the best interest of the company to not pay insurance but the formula would need to be how many claims for life saving are being denied that caused the person to die do to either poor care or debt.

3
Galean 3 points ago +3 / -0

I assume they will just migrate somewhere else with a better economy. It would take generations to go milk all of the non-eastern Europe countries

2
Galean 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shows the need for stronger gun laws in Florida and Texas.

8
Galean 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don't get the calculation. If I'm generally healthy and will not need much in terms of health coverage but I do have a good insurance payed by my employer - would the extra money I put in go towards the number of people killed?

10
Galean 10 points ago +10 / -0

make it as diverse as black panther and the nba, I've heard both are award winning diverse

4
Galean 4 points ago +4 / -0

communal would imply they have something in common to be communal about. Except the temporarily shared geographic location, is there anything left to bring "diverse" people together?

32
Galean 32 points ago +32 / -0

this is next level of sick. It's not enough to replace the native population but now they want their kids to die and not for any other reason but to defend those that are replacing them.

The level of evil is beyond depressing

1
Galean 1 point ago +1 / -0

European governments hate their past, are ashamed by their heritage, they discriminate against their own people. This are not real countries anymore so why would US care about past alliances with entities without past. If European countries are just economical entities then they need to be treated as such. Either it is profitable or they can go fuck a cactus.

2
Galean 2 points ago +2 / -0

In getting over its phobia of debt

How is not liking an obvious negative thing a phobia?

2
Galean 2 points ago +3 / -1

I want Zelda to be modeled after Zendaya and Link after Pedro Pascal

2
Galean 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt Tencent is doing poorly and Chinese games are seen as non-woke, sadly a Chinese game will have higher player faith then a current Ubisoft game.

If Tencent scrapes the current dev teams, reduce the cost and make non-woke games people will start buying Ubisoft games again. Prince of Persia still has potential, despite their Prince of Persia BLM, R6 is also salvageable, Heroes of Might and Magic is gathering dust and mostly non-woke - even AC, as long as it is not woke and not open-world will be a success.

6
Galean 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because Ubisoft is toast, their games are to high budget and Outlaws floped, AC shadows failed, Skull And Bones - their AAAA game - also failed, AC Mirage and Prince of Persia Floyd edition - I have no idea if it failed but It either was a flop or just not great. Their last money maker was probably Valhalla and that was 2020.

They've lost way to much money and their is no chance to turn things around. The current theory is that they got encouraged internally to listen to their constantly increasing number of activists to intentionally drop in share values so that China would buy them.

37
Galean 37 points ago +37 / -0

Considering the English have already been forced thru all of that and no one at UN cares, it is safe to assume that it only applies to non-white cultures

view more: Next ›