Comment Reported for: This is a bot
I'm going to need some evidence that you are human Michalusmichalus
Post Reported for:
- Rule 11 - Spam
- Rule 7 - Personal Information
Post Removed for: Rule 7 - Personal Information
This post falls afoul of the rule regarding "Twitter nobodies". Gotta have at least 2,500 followers before posting about comments like this.
Post Reported for: Rule 11 - Spam
This is a bit of a low effort post N, you will want to add some commentary.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
This isn't explicit disinformation, but watch it on Rule 16. You've been warned before, gopower. You're as close to that line as you need to be.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment already removed
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
JFC
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Not directed at users.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
I honestly can't tell where the satire ended in this comment.
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Directed at user.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
No psycho posting.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
We are allowed to call eachother faggots.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that. Also, Graphenium is far closer to a White Nationalist as far as I can tell.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
We are explicitly allowed to call each other retards and faggots.
Comment Reported for: Obvious troll
Yes, he an obvious troll. But to his credit, he has long since followed the rules. I've never opposed modest trolling so long as it doesn't take over the board. Trolling can otherwise pop the bubbles of echo-chambers, and force you all to come up with good counter arguments. Hater has long since maintained the lightest prodding in a very traditional sense of trolling.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Is it? Is it a racial conspiracy, or is he saying that a literal army made of jews will literally do this thing.
I feel like it's going to fall on the latter.
Comment Reported for: Rule 11 - Spam
This is the lightest trolling he could have done.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Stop getting baited.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Jesus, Cato.
Post Reported for: Conpro posting
Post Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks.
Honestly, Telia, this really is just a low-hanging, jew-bashing post now. I'm not going to pretend that I don't understand you are insinuating the need to resist the jews in your eternal race war. You're not even disguising it properly. This is just a low-effort ConPro post.
Post Reported for: Spam or Self Promotion
Post Approved: More like a drama post, but not a Rule 3 violation.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
Comment Approved: Again, this is m0r1arty flipping an actual rule violation on it's head to disarm it. To claim that white people get sunburned is equivalent to saying that jews argue a lot, or blacks struggle with swimming. I don't see this as a moral indictment of a race.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks (x2)
I don't think calling someone a redneck is a rule violation. It's not about calling someone a slur that violates Rule 16. It's about what they are asserting. And unless he's asserting that there is some sort of white racial conspiracy to keep him down, or that whites are inherently inferior, it doesn't cross that mark.
Then there's the question, "is Shlomo more offensive than Redneck" and it seems like in the Anglosphere context they would be about the same, so even as slurs against users, it doesn't seem like it warrants a removal.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Groups
Comment Approved: I honestly don't see the violation here. None of what he said was any sort of slander or proclaimed moral innate moral deficiency towards an identity category. Paragraph 3 is a universal statement. Paragraph 4 contains no insults or moral assertions. Paragraph 5 is directed at directed users.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
I don't see how. The CCP have been explicitly involved in this.
Post Reported for:
Nothing is sufficiently insulting to be considered a slur.
National Socialists are not an identity group.