0
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 0 points ago +2 / -2

Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs

You are allowed to call each other faggots.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - identity groups

This doesn't do this.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Approved: This is criticism of Catholicism as a religion.

-13
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -13 points ago +4 / -17

If that were true, you wouldn't consider them inferior to all other groups.

That's assuming we're going to play this game where you deflect from why you consider them worse than all other groups of people on the planet.

-4
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -4 points ago +4 / -8

I am, right now, not looking at the parent comment because I'm replying to you in my messages.

We're now back to an unfalsifiable position: you should have removed the parent comment even though it wasn't reported, because you should have known it was there without a report, but you shouldn't have removed the child comment, even though it was reported.

-6
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -6 points ago +4 / -10

If people don't think it's rule violating content, then fair enough. But someone did report him. As such, that answers the question for why his content was removed and that the parent content was not. It was not removed because I'm a secret crypto-jew trying to undermine the progress of racial solidarity.

-12
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -12 points ago +8 / -20

I sticked the response because it's a post about an enforcement mechanism. It should be made visible, by definition. You can call it snarky as you want, but he never reported the offending comment. Nobody did. You didn't report it. OP didn't report it. Nobody in this thread reported it. Not even after making a post about it, and linking to the thread in the comments of this post.

-14
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -14 points ago +7 / -21

When I click on your comment from my feed, I only see your comment, not it's parent.

Worst, by definition, means inferior in some way to literally all others.

-13
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -13 points ago +4 / -17

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

This comment doesn't do that.

Also, I'm literally not a jew, you fucking idiot. That quote is me pointing out that you retards are too stupid to tell the fucking difference between someone who's not a jew, and someone who is a jew, so you'll shoot both because you're violent faggots with no ability to live outside your psychotic delusions.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

Comment Approved: I don't think this is true, but it doesn't violate this rule.

1
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

Unless you mean in a fully judicial way

-1
DomitiusOfMassilia -1 points ago +1 / -2

I know what has to be done, and none of it requires violence. I'm also going to allow people to disagree over topics, even to the point of yelling at each other, so long as it is expressed and left in the thread.

2
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks

It is not an identity attack to identify someone as white, Mrs. Warren.

-8
DomitiusOfMassilia [M] -8 points ago +4 / -12

Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech

No fedposting, particularly on a thread where people who were already NOT fedposting were arrested for fedposting.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›