He already fulfilled most of his end of the bargain with his version of God, so it's perfectly okay to abandon relatives if they're being extra or refuse to worship. Such is following a centuries-old book written by Men to the letter.
atheist -> There is no god. Lol I'm smart sCiEnCe RuLeS
anti-theist -> I don't like religion, it doesn't benefit humanity.
These two things aren't alike.
Once again users have gotten lazy about source posting.
I guess the realization caused a conditioned reaction to where he tried to deny it immediately. Sort of like a mental paradox that breaks the psyche.
It's best if the women engaging in this already have expired eggs / barren uterus. Just don't let it ruin the younger ones who are so easily led by the nose.
Ah okay, I see how that might have set the guy off.
I don't get into political discussions at all with people in meatspace. Nor do I try to force people into hair trigger discussions. Waste of time and energy.
Then I hit the topic of anti white discrimination, and he went off
You gave no example of how you phrased it, so we have no clue how it is you triggered him.
Yet happy i can at least come here to talk with natsoc boyos instead of limp dick soyos
You're fortunate there's enough of your ilk camping here and engaging in polite discussion. You claim to have been here long before, so I'm sure you know many here are not fans of authoritarianism or statism.
So, doing what they already were doing last time he was in office?
It's more simple than that, nothing psychological.
When you're in a top-down Imperial society that demands all peons contribute back to the top for the survival of the Glorious Government, anyone that isn't contributing back in a meaningful manner is looked down upon as a negative. Entertainers pretty much fit that bill when you think about it, as they're rather extraneous to human survival.
If it truly is the "they can pretend, so they're untrustworthy" mentality, might be more of the average person's lack of understanding the ability to compartmentalize. I don't think all of pre-Industrial era acting had the same kind of problems Hollywood and beyond acting had too. The concept of celebrity didn't really reach it's modern emptiness until mass media became a thing.
burakkumin
The noting of "gravediggers" should point to that it wasn't a full-proof idea in Japan. To my knowledge, this "caste" includes animal butchers, a profession that can also be necessary to society. IIRC, depending on the region this attitude is still practiced to this day.
I would have said "exhibitionists" as nudism is legal in private property/designated areas.
Yeah, I wasn't entirely sure what the proper term in this context would be, so I went with that word
sex offender registry protester
The subject matter becomes a hot button topic because the registry can include morons found naked while intoxicated, "urinating in public", and possible convicts of false rape accusations. To my knowledge, almost any sexual/nudity-related offense or misdemeanor automatically gets you thrown on the list. It should still exist for convicted pedophiles, assailants, proven rapists and nudists, but like most criminals there's no remediation once you end up docked the first time. Doesn't matter the level of offense, because it's not tiered; normal life pretty much ends.
Rightwingers are now placated into inaction
You want to be productive, go start your own Patriot Front.
I thought maybe they'd be a thorn in our side briefly, but it's obvious they're going to be a bother the entirety of Trump's second term.
Because some of you faggots never shut up about jews
that showed up on Jan 6 at his request
He told them to go home in his speech that day and tried working with the DC Mayor to up security to avoid conflict, you retard.
You're just upset that you didn't get your little acceleration to Civil War and simply behaving as a worse caricature of the "centrist" fence-sitters that claim both sides are bad. So stay mad.
I'm well aware of the bigger picture going on here, but I'm not going to let it affect my sanity.
Many of us were already aware of his connections. We just don't make galaxy-brain moves on a chessboard
Oh boy, so not only are we going to be dealing with Marxists screeching and rioting, but also groypers complaining too?
It's never enough with you pukes.
No, MLGS usually tells retards to shut up on occasion, not always helpful but some deserve it. And since Kopkot is one of those pussies that purges accounts routinely (given the way he talks, it makes sense) and complaining about our victory, he does deserve it.
whenever someone threatens the standing of zion don here... tell me, is it because it's S.O.P., or is it because your salaries are too low to come up with anything better?
AnYoNe WhO cOmPlAiNs AbOuT jEwPoStInG iS a FiLtHy JeW oR jDf StOoGe
Give it a fucking rest.
Their huffing about tariffs is moot since the recent push from Congress to go after Temu/AliExpress for "exploiting American customers".
EDIT: I'll put a proper response
The core of where the complaint is coming from, that the prices will certainly increase, is somewhat a legit concern. Because many non-perishable products bought in the US come from off-shore, the economy could hurt briefly to force some companies to bring parts production back onshore. It also would probably mean a soft reset, realigning some prices with the true price, while also forcing companies to have to forgo "disposable" products that should be durable.
For the tax cuts, this would soften the temporary blow to the economy that tariffs could bring and zero out the cost that Americans would have to cover. Then the main issue would be the purchasing power of the dollar as it can't be too low. Also, there are some classes of "essential" items (household appliances for one) that are completely offshore at this point and would probably take months to get all of it back to domestic, as moving and setting up manufacturing doesn't happen in a week. People might wind up paying American prices for Chinese-made junk in some areas. The long-term benefits do outweigh the short-term, but citizens might be unhappy during the transition
The bigger question to me is does this raise the cost of importing something that would obviously never be available in the US (e.g. merchandise from Japan, European cheese, etc.)? Caution should to be given as to what to put tariffs on. If it's Chinese junk, fine, I think people will manage assuming that there aren't many "essential" purchases that have been off-shored. If it's all imports, that's a different story.
Another hit from the slowly-growing "Now That's What I Call Coping: 2016 Redux" collection
Methinks the creature has been summoned to enter within the 495th to perform a pestilent pantomime in front of the mooks.
Some of states ended up so close it's concerning. Either rigging is going on or we're truly in for the long haul the next few presidential cycles.
Groypers are needy basket cases.
Movements sometimes have their break-away batch of extremists that have no concept of political strategy or smart concession-making.
I put this paradox under the banner of logical fallacy.
Since what is described as "tolerance" can be defined by the cultural norms of a certain society, what is marked as "intolerance" is entirely subjective to the society handling said "intolerance". The idea of what qualifies as "intolerance" is not absolutely transferable between societies, and such, no universal definition can exist so long as multiple societies cohabit this planet. With there being no concrete definition between societies, you can never properly define "intolerance", and therefore never be justified in your own intolerance towards "intolerance".
Declaring that some intolerance is necessary opens the door for conflation of what is deemed as intolerance based on other unrelated subjects. A good example of this would be the current year Marxists. According to the history books Nazis are the most recent examples of "intolerance", however these marxists view all forms of anti-neomarxism as akin to Nazism, therefore it's perfectly acceptable to them to be intolerant to people who are against neomarxism, because to them they are no different than "Nazis".