Naturally, the rebuttal will be that any vaccine statistically will impact many given the order of magnitude of people being injected.
I'm curious if anyone knows what threshold said people would actually consider unsafe, especially when keeping in mind that the numbers are being underrepresented.
Don't think they've walked back the safe for pregnant women guidance either, but they were aggressive on that during the rollout...
However, many of them have earned enough to live reasonably for the rest of their lives.
That's something very few can boast of, especially when it comes to maintaining important convictions, but sadly they don't care or have irreconcilable scientific delusions.
I'm just waiting to see if the absurdity in results changes anyone's opinion -- it's fairly comical to read places like r/nfl maintaining the façade.
Other sports like the NBA and NFL are having similar issues. Note:
The reason for the opt-out, according to league chiefs, was because the spike caused the "regular-season schedule [to be] materially disrupted as a result of increasing Covid cases and a rising number of postponed games."
...and this was the preceding paragraph, which is statistically insane if true, and why I created this thread:
This is despite the league previously reporting a near-100 percent vaccination rate across more than 700 players – with just one player, Tyler Bertuzzi of the Detroit Red Wings, reported to have declined to be vaccinated.
a) What is it in response to?
Purely marketing / $$$. Corporations sponsor these types of initiatives and if you take away the discriminatory action, so does the money (i.e. it won't be on the table for non-segregated initiatives).
I don't disparage anyone for voting Trump considering the past alternatives. Republican opposition had its own flaws and I dare anyone to defend Hillary here. I do disparage those who always give him softball excuses, however.
I can understand that type of stuff on TheDonald, but we've never really tied our identity to Trump despite some overlap and currently being on the WIN platform; we just happen to hate far-left liberals and authoritarians, and that is never changing because it's strictly about ideology.
It is annoying that such a small group demands so much representation
Agreed it's annoying to see corporate whores acede to such demands, but remember that's it's precisely because they're very small that they cry out for the attention.
It's the equivalent of having sexual fetishes. Some may be harmless while others are so degenerate that it necessitates defense from those reluctant to admit it but shameless enough not to shut up about it, and trying to normalize it.
Having a discussion about 'right' or 'wrong' is never enough. Ultimately, it ends up in the normalization phase.
I guess the rich are happy enough because it divides the populace, supports depopulation trends, they or themselves have a loved one that falls into trans-faggotry, or whatever. The movers and shakers of the world will act as they please and puppets (including corporations) will follow.
Does anyone have a good alternative for this site?
Necessary evil. From all the sites I looked into, and have survived, only SankakuComplex and this were worth following on a regular basis.
Chan forums are probably the 'best' for news, but it's a bit unwieldy.
Traitors of America - https://archive.vn/wvWe2
I agree about comparing console games to PC games that have 18+ patches is stupid, but a lot of the list about shit like breasts jiggling.
Meanwhile the same platform has had actual nudity approved and released within the region. Clearly the ratings board are not relevant; in case of games like "Omega Labyrinth Life" and its PS4 equivalent "Labyrinth Life", the problem in a nut shell, and that's a good case -- most can't be bothered with maintaining multiple versions, so they omit it altogether and the practice continues adoption.
This is "anti-sexualization" woke crap, but true, it's not on the same level as say censoring any allusion to Taiwan being its own sovereign nation, etc.
appease ratings boards
True for cases like certain Islamic countries or Australia, but not so true with other Western states.
perhaps censored before even being released
This is still censorship and it's honestly worse because of its covertness.
I really don't have an insatiable need
Do personal desires matter when it comes to principles? It comes up every time and I don't see how it's relevant to the meta point of not wanting companies like Sony from being authoritarians.
These threads are hard because you don't know what games are common, but I'll throw out a name:
One Way Heroics, costs about $1 USD and is a fun roguelike made in RPG Maker. Concept is the hero can only move in 1 direction (more or less).
Nice, also holy shit but it's literally pages of "Rule 16". Also:
11 days ago A moderator banned user TheImpossible1 - 12 days with reason: Rule 16 12 days https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/140Iih11Mq/x/c/4JINAvr8oIa Please stop
They've made sure we'll never have the data (see throwawayaccount2037's post among other historical news re: the topic), and keep trivializing VAERS due to its reporting nature.
It's more or less impossible to compare under those parameters, and there is no long-term trial thanks to the control group being vaccinated for 'humanitarian' reasons.
Which is why I ask if anyone has seen a set percentage that would qualify as dangerous by these bad-faith personnel. I'm guessing not.