You only assume anybody knows what you mean because it's entirely normal to think everybody's like you.
Nobody is, you have to actually explain what you mean. Also, it can get pretty interesting, actually engaging with other people. There are a LOT of really smart, talented, and creative people here from a wide variety of backgrounds.
It's used for any type of comparison, not just race. Say you want to plan how many firetrucks a small town of 10,000 people needs. You could compare it to cities of 100,000 and a million, see how many firetrucks they use, and see if your plans seem reasonable.
It's all relative, yup :)
blacks commit WAY more than they out right ought to. that concept i get.
Right. And your concept of relativity works fine, too!
Let's say that out of every 10 white people, one commits a violent crime of some type. (The numbers in this comparison are totally made up, just to illustrate the point and keep the math easy)
Now let's say that out of every 10 black people, 2 commit a violent crime of some type. (This too is false, crime statistics are given in terms of 100,000 people, not 10)
So you have 1 per 10, or 2 per 10. Per ten people.
That's all "per capita" means. I don't know Latin but I'm guessing "capita" is Latin for person because most stuff in our system is. (This would be a valid example of "systemic racism," we use technical terms based on ancient Rome, not Swahili)
The idea of per capita is to have a valid comparison that makes up for the huge difference in our population, between blacks, whites, and asians is mostly what our government tracks.
Was that explanation at all helpful?
Look at it this way:.
there's 65 white people in a hypothetical situation. Out of those, 5 commit violent crime.
There's 13 black people in the same group. Out of those, 4 commit murder.
Which group is more violent? To have an equal comparison, whites would have to murder 20 people. Can you see that?
This example is not perfectly representative of reality, the math would have to be harder to do that. But the total number in this group is pretty close to real life, and represents the idea of per capita. 65 is 5x more than 13, so the group of 65 would have to commit 5x more murder to be equal. (per person / per capita)
blacks actually commit WAY more crimes than the other non white races. and almost commit just as much as white people.
Over 400 more murders by blacks, straight comparison. Whatever this data's drawn from.
While white are far more than 4x the population.
The original filings had no evidence of fraud, despite all the work other people did to put it at his fingertips. I don't know the process for raising that evidence after the initial filing, but obviously it did not work.
The irony is Guliani wanted to make the cases solely about legal technicalities, and they all got dismissed based on nothing but legal technicalities. He also started drinking heavily very early in the day the entire time he was on the case. Does that mean he never put in a decent day's work?
Yes!
1/6 lots of faggots (figurative language) got scared
Our best content creators were busy crunching election data Nationwide. Courts ignored all evidence, and Rudy Giuliani made sure no evidence was presented. Said people left this platform.
Voat got shut down. The refugees were given a home here instead of being driven off as the community requested. Many left over this, too. This left sort of a "power vacuum," giving retarded Voat refugees a bigger % voice here. This is the nazi element here, white supremacists, and racists. ALSO, some formerly good people have been persuaded by their bs arguments. I've actively fought here against this, a LOT.
In a nutshell, that's this slice of dark history. Add to that mix subverters of every stripe which includes our own government trying to make MAGA look evil, WEF trying to D&C, Russian and Chinese troll farms ...
Make America Great Again shouldn't even be available as a campaign slogan, anybody running for Office should have that as a goal, but they actively destroy the Nation instead. This includes most R Congress critters, and 40+ Governors.
I do agree with your comment above. This used to be a key component of this entire platform. It's a major part of the ideology of the founding of the US.
This explains so much
What you're talking about is irrelevant. Most jurisdictions are counting ineligible ballots. Many are not paper.
True. Some people are like that. Not exactly what 1984 depicts, but effectively at least as bad.
These machines were literally made for the sole purpose of rigging elections. Testimony before US Congress after the 2000 election was that they can fix any election 49-51% in either direction and you'd never be able to tell unless every ballot was paper and counted by hand.
That means that NO machine can be used, and counting by hand is essential.
It doesn't get simpler. There is no reason for any exception. Lock the door after polls close, and count until done. Precincts are designed so this is possible. You can have a fresh crew come in say a half hour before polls close to count until they're done. An observer from each major party to make sure every vote is legit.
HONEST.
Totals from each precinct can be added and double checked by anybody. 0 problems. 0 need for anything else. 0 excuse for anything else.
That way you're not just trusting the machine to count your vote.
Yes you are. The machine counts them. People only do under specific circumstances. That's the whole problem.
You can't put a group of people defined by being born in an 18 year period into a category like you're trying to do.
People are individuals. You might be able to predict trends, but not individuals.
You should be addressing concepts here. Some people are going to keep watching Faux, some are going to leave MSM altogether. Try to exert some influence in the right direction when you get a chance.
Oh we see it.
We've seen everything and can't unsee it.
Take the redpill ...
Very reasonable.
This is brilliant, lol. I'd watch it :)
I wouldn't have talked about anything like this with my parents had this happened back then either, even if it wasn't due to trauma.
Who's worse, the troon reading, the host of the event, or the parent bringing their kid to it?
I'm assuming no two parents discuss this and decide it's a good idea.
Thank you for explaining this ... odd situation.
Turkey has the fifth most powerful military in NATO.
You may have meant second most troops?
Jews owned the ships that brought settlers here. There is no history of European colonization on this continent that's free of jews. They just kept quiet about it and you're still fooled.