If you read Trump's book, you'll realize his success came from his dad's money (ofc) then he got lucky (ofc) and he played dirty in a way a lot of other businessmen didn't expect and especially likely because of someone his age and not necessarily from where he started. He also bluffed big time and barely managed to get financing in time when the bluff was called. He was just a rich kid who came out guns ablazing and got lucky. The reason he was guns ablazing is because he's not that smart. He did do a few smart things though that he obviously learned from his dad.
I believe Trump worships jews because he sees how dirty they do business and envies them. Trump sees dirty business as good business.
What did you expect? All the AI companies are run by jews. We're given goyslop AI while Israel gets the uncensored good shit.
Until all jews are removed from society, nothing will get better and everything new will be trash.
In this video from the Sam & Nick's Perfect Clips channel, Sam Hyde and Nick Rochefort discuss the philosophy of combat sports, the impact of technology on creative processes, and the idea that "limitations breed creativity."
Combat Sports as Art Boxing vs. MMA: Sam argues that boxing is a superior art form compared to MMA because of its strict limitations [21:07]. He believes that in MMA, a highly skilled and "artful" striker can be defeated by "ugly" or "messy" techniques like grappling or calf kicks, which he feels reduces the "high art" of the sport [16:50].
Raw Aesthetics: The two discuss the raw nature of combat, referencing the sound of punches in audience-free COVID-era fights [00:13] and the brutal realism of underground "King of the Streets" style fighting, which they contrast with the polished, sponsor-heavy presentation of the UFC [22:57].
How Limitations Breed Creativity Film Editing: Sam reflects on his time in art school, specifically using Steenbeck film editing machines [08:44]. Because it took several minutes to physically splice and tape film together, editors were forced to "measure twice and cut once," leading to deeper, more intentional creative choices that are often lost in modern, "nonlinear" digital editing where changes take seconds [10:50].
Car Design: He critiques modern car design, arguing that it has "fallen so far" because designers have switched from physical clay modeling and drawing to computer-aided design (CAD) [11:12].
The "ZBrush" Effect: Tools like ZBrush allow anyone to create "aggressive-looking" shapes easily, but Sam argues this is just the tool expressing itself rather than the designer expressing their nature [15:41].
Material Expression: He notes that metal is difficult to work with and wants to be formed in certain ways, whereas plastic can be formed into any shape. He believes the resistance and limitations of metal forced designers in the 1960s to create more "righteous" and beautiful shapes [16:01].
Cultural Critiques Performance Culture: Sam mocks people who obsess over "stats" and "best" rankings—such as 0-60 car times—arguing that this is a substitute for a real identity [18:14].
The "Performance Casual" Look: He specifically targets the "tech-bro" aesthetic, criticizing the "electric blue polo" and "Cole Haan Oxford shoes with white bottoms" as a uniform for people who value efficiency and performance over true style and creativity [19:18].
How is higher taxes a failure? Communists ideally want 100% taxes.
By not watching it?
Thanks. Great response.
Almost mimics humans to a degree. Autistic sperg who tells you the truth that everyone hates in social contexts or the con artist who lies half the time but everyone loves him.
Yeah, that's happened to me. It'll gives me the answer to something that sounds plausible but when you fact check its response, it's all made up. Happens way too often.
Ahhh, so you're saying the censorship of AI causes it to get stuff wrong and make things up to satisfy the "policy" demands placed on it?
He's got more balls then all White people combined.
I summarized the video using Gemini:
Gemini said This video is a brief, controversial interview segment with the late chess world champion Bobby Fischer, where he shares his derogatory views on women in both chess and society.
Views on Chess Performance Skill Level: Fischer claims that women are "terrible" chess players and that he could give any of them—including the world champion at the time—the advantage of a knight and still win easily [00:05].
Historical Standing: He asserts that there has never been a female chess player in history capable of standing up against a man [00:36].
Perceived Intelligence: When asked why he believes women struggle at chess, he suggests they are "just not so smart" [00:24].
Views on Women in Society Intellectual Affairs: Fischer argues that women should not involve themselves in "intellectual affairs" [01:08].
Domestic Roles: He suggests that a woman’s place is strictly in the home, "cleaning things" and waiting for her husband to return [01:22].
Misogyny: When the interviewer asks if he would call himself a woman-hater, Fischer denies it [01:00], though he reiterates his stance on their intellectual capabilities immediately after.
NOTE: For the record, this took me 30 seconds to read. So, a summary if provided by the OP would save everyone 2/3s the time as they spent watching the video. If 100 people read the topic, he could be saving a collective hour and a half if he provided a summary. Youtube video, as far as I am concerned, are some of the worst formats for disseminating information. Anyone linking a video so be forced to provide a summary.
Not sure what you mean by this? How does a "Rothschilds bank" help anyone?
The whole idea of "woke right" was just created by controlled opposition conservatives who were worried that the right-wing was becoming racially concious so they came up with "woke right" to try and cause division among right-wingers and minimize the impact of the right wing becoming racially concious.
There truly is no "woke right", there's just liberals who pretend to be right wing. We saw this 20 years ago with "classical liberals". Many liberals realized how crazy leftism was becoming so these liberals tried to distinguish themselves as "classical liberals" instead of fully embracing the direction liberalism was headed. Eventually, many of these classical liberals ended up right-wing. Some gave up liberalism altogether as they realized how terrible liberalism truly was while some still clinged to their classical liberalism. The guys in the "right wing" who are throwing out the "woke right" insult tend to be these classical liberals that have refused to adapt their political ideology. Instead, they've been trying to subvert right-wing ideology to be classical liberalism but it's not. These people belong in the left-wing camp or a third party. They are not right wingers. Classical liberalism is not opposition to leftism, it's the same thing going the speed limit.
I think the whole war is just designed to try to get Netanyahu pardoned for his crimes.
Like with most games, it's fun if the people playing it are extremely casual and no one takes it too seriously. As soon as people start to sperg out about the game such that they min/max it and play it to death, it becomes unfun.
I've read a lot of Greek literature.
Do you see Patroclus and by extension Achilles as gay?
Not at all.
The whole Greeks are gay, imo, stems from English readers misinterpreting brotherly love and womanly love. Greeks did view the love between brother-at-arms (friends who were like brothers) to be stronger than the love between a man-and-woman. Aristotle even says in his work that a woman cannot love a man as strongly as a man loves a man because a woman never sacrifices for the other and always views the relationship as a transaction with the desired outcome to be such that the relationship benefits her more than the man.
The Greeks were simply right but somewhere down the line the idea of men loving men like brothers (friends) got forgotten and love started to only be attributed to the opposite sex or literal family. Arguably, this was done on purpose from a top-down perspective to weaken male bonds and chain all men to women because the men become easier to control by rulers. The women would have latched onto the same because men with weak bonds to other men are easier for her to control also. One of the areas we still see brotherly love come to fruition in modernity is war. The Greeks were a waring people so they'd have experienced this, especially those in the outskirt towns who weren't from the artsy Athenians. It's no surprise that one of the most notorious modern examples of brotherly love came from Lord of the Rings where the author serves in WWI yet many said Sam and Frodo were gay when they clearly weren't, at all.
Were there Greek philosophers fucking boys? Probably, of course. Every society gets its fair share of gays. To say Greeks as a whole were significantly gay or tolerated gays is false. Most accounts I can recall from primary sources describing gay tendencies were never positive.
Or when they just don't realize yet that they can be severely punished for speaking their mind.
Is this woman simulator accurate? Should be about 2 hours of house work then the rest of the time she's chatting with men online to bang behind her bf/husband's back.
That's the part many aren't getting. He wasn't being misogynistic or insulting at all but he was being technically correct, something tons of boys his age with a brain often do.
He saw his reflection in a cell phone.
Can you take southern BC too for better pipelines routes to Washington? It's the nicest area of Canada with literally the best weather.
Yeah, I was gonna say the more expensive option for sure would have non-White scammers.
The Civil Rights Act and equivalent antidiscrimination laws in other countries will all be eliminated once and only once Whites are such a minority, they're the ones who'll face the biggest challenges with allowing discrimination. The laws were implemented entirely to oppress White men.
The strongest economy I've ever experienced was 20 years ago before the financial crisis when oil was $80/barrel.
How long before it's banned from the steam store for wrong-think?