I'm pretty tired of noticing, but I felt the jewposting lately was pretty low effort. Thus this post. At this point, I'm convinced you could write a book that would make Hitler blush just by using excerpts of things like the OP article. If I were Joe Shlomo, I'd be pretty pissed off at my co-ethnics.
Fucking radical, ain't it?
I'm headed down a rabbit hole in regards to Tom Braden, the guy sitting across from Pat Buchanan. I was not familiar with him. It seems he was a CIA man through and through, and even wiki includes the fact he used company money to influence American politics. In line with the congressman's claims in the CNN Crossfire interview, he was funding "anti-Soviet' leftists, ie moving the US more gently to the left. This was probably not public in '83 when this interview was done. Of course, his 'journalistic' career after leaving the agency was obviously not a retirement from his previous work.
That's pretty interesting. There's a whole lot there that seems prophetic 40 years later.
Edit: especially the disingenuous pearl clutching about conspiracies.
Doesn't this very much echo the current response of the DoJ / Silicon Valley / Journos to groups like, say, Moms for Liberty? Here's what the ADL did back then:
But the ADL also had undercover agents with code names, who were able to infiltrate the society’s headquarters in Belmont, Massachusetts, and various chapter officers. They dug up financial and employment information about individual Birchers. And they not only used the material for their own newsletters and press releases, but they also fed information to the media.
I'll have to check it out. Thanks for the recommendation Smith; your posts always remind me there's good stuff out there even if you have to dig.
Some Jews appear to be particularly adept at taking advantage of others' good principles. If Americans believe in the freedom of speech and the right to petition the government, some Jews will use that to restrict the freedom of speech of and ability to petition the government of non-Jewish Americans. Organizations like the ADL, AIPAC, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the ACLU all appear to operate like this. Once the Civil Rights Act of 1964 became law, it became impossible to root out.
Buckley is one of those that I don't know who he was working for, but I know he was working for someone. That goes for all the Neoconservatives that crushed the grassroots conservatives of the 40s and 50s. The Neocons being Trotskyites after all.
I doubt anything regarding the ADL would be surprising but the article is worth a read for the brazenness alone. These guys still openly admit to doing this stuff (updated for the digital age), and have government contracts.
The horses' mouth: "The last thing I’ll say is that one of the admirable things in the 1960s about the ADL and the liberal coalition it belonged to is that it built support for landmark legislation like the Immigration Act of 1965, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of ’65. '
Forgot to archive because much dumb: https://archive.is/hPtqY
Hart-Cellar was essentially made possible by CRA of 64. I've become partial to the idea some have put forward that CRA64 is essentially a crypto Constitution that Americans are unaware of. If inequalities are against the law and the government believes it has a mandate to stamp it out, then it has authority to control every aspect of public life. Americans would never have voted in favor of requiring schools to hire homosexuals, change the demographics of the country, or any of the other milestones of the past 60 years. But the government seems to move independent of the people using said crypto constitution as justification. It seem that HC is just one of many implementations of this idea.
First, he is wrong about Americans: prior to 1965 Americans were a Nation largely described as comprised of White Christian descendants of various European countries. Note here nation means people not government. Country, Nation, and State are not synonyms. Were there other types of people living in the United States? Yes. Doesn't change anything.
Second, if I were to say in public what this guy is saying, I would be accused of anti-Semitism.
May I introduce you to Executive Order 6102?
in exchange for $20.67 (equivalent to $487 in 2023)
Current spot price: $2,351.70
Their primitive ways are speciali, while mine are not.
This FUCKING right here. They will worship the ground walked on by some backwards culture then criticize their neighbors for "regressive old fashioned ideas that have no place in modern society." Muzzie good, white man bad.
Methinks Americans should put as much effort into owning Killdozers as we do guns. Not much the local jackboots can do if a few of these come rolling down the street.
associate the JQ with communism
I don't think Tony is doing this. Even if he was, that leads to a discussion of who exactly the Bolsheviks were, not to mention the 1918 German Revolution.
I mean OP's post literally has the new Mexican President standing next to the man who runs one of the most powerful equity firms in the world and has openly talked about using that wealth to support things like DEI an other similar causes. Just because Rick doesn't get invited to those kind of parties doesn't mean nobody does.
There was a time when the JQ was taken seriously by people who were definitely not Nazis. What changed? And why can't we point out the very odd international and statistically improbable prominence of Jews in power?
Always funny that, even with a poor pope, the answer to "is the Pope Catholic?" remains the same. Francis is still always cutting it close, though.
Edit: The Italians have always said: "after a thin pope, a fat pope." I hope they're right.
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and calls abortion a sacrament like a duck. . .
Since its all piratical in nature, why couldn't a viewing involve a UTC start time and all comers bring their own copy of a certain torrent?
Never trust anything from the Government that is designed "to protect the children".
I accept your terms, provided that jackboots don't get in the way if my town wants to tar and feather lqbtq teachers and pornographers then burn their houses and drop them off at city limits. "Think of the children" is a lefty meme from when lefties could still meme. It meant, and still means: tolerate bullshit you would never otherwise consider because "the constitution or something." We should think of our children and we should be willing to hang folks who would harm them.
But leftist seem to love heroes
Power. It all comes down to power. Anyone who pays attention to leftie shit knows that that they would all love to be the person putting bullets into wrongthinkers. What a wrongthinker thinks is not important, only that they think wrong and a leftist gets to put a bullet into their head.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.? Most people don't realized that the proliferation of expensive McDegrees and business requiring a college education for the most basic entry jobs is a direct result of government action.
Prior to Griggs companies almost universally hired people then trained and promoted from within. That's why prior to the 70s most managers and many technical folks had no more than a high school education. The methodology was to hire high school graduates (if that) and train on the job and promote capable people as the need arose. For example a quality control chemist, or even a lab manager, have no need of an undergraduate degree to do the work; it used to be that someone took a job as a lab assistant and if they were smart and hardworking, they had reasonable hope of advancing their pay and career.
Griggs v. Duke essentially ended this approach for the whole country. You see the way companies achieved the aforementioned employee selection/promotion process was using a combination of intelligence, aptitude, and knowledge testing to determine who to train and who to promote. The problem is that Griggs and other plaintiffs were not passing these exams at a rate comparable to white employees. The Griggs decision basically said that if there are racial disparities in the results of testing, using that testing is employment discrimination and that a company would be punished under federal employment law. Yes, the decision technically left open the option for testing that was "reasonably related to the job," but this left the plaintiffs of Damocles hanging over any company that wanted to rely on testing for the selection or promotion of employees.
So employers looked for other ways of choosing and promoting employees. The further the criteria were from their control, the safer employers were from employment law. What shook out was the use of college degrees as a baseline. At first this seemed great: if you had a degree you were guaranteed a job. At first. This is the boomer era of "just go to college." Then basic economics reared its head. Educational institutions were suddenly facing an unlimited supply of customers who needed their product to get a job. Universities grew, bloated their budgets, and started selling degrees that were useful only in that they were degrees. Decades of administrative and budgetary excesses and the irrelevance of the quality of the product lead to today post-secondary education environment.
So here we are. College educations are shitty AND overpriced. And its still borderline illegal to figure out who is and who is not competent, and its defiantly illegal to do anything about it.
I couldn't find it on youtube, but I distinctly remember an uncomfortable exchange in the news coverage between Obama and a Journalist on the campaign trail in '08. The question was asked while he was walking to his SUV and he spun around in furry. It was one of those eerie moments when someone's face suddenly changes to that of another person. Then it was gone in an instant. It wasn't like he just got ahold of his temper; it was more like putting a mask right back on. I've seen it before on a personal level, and let's just say its been from Cluster B / sociopathy type people. Never felt quite comfortable with him after watching that exchange on tv.