The Holodomor especially too. Solzhenitsyn explains that well.
When it comes to Communist China some of the people who helped found it are very interesting.
It's definitely true for Westworld. The first season was very good, but the 2nd was pretty bad even if it didn't seem to add in too many progressive elements. I didn't get around to watching the 3rd season at all.
Game of Thrones as well. I enjoyed the 1st season. 2-4 were good too, but I think I stopped watching partway through the 5th just because I didn't want to bother any more.
Doctor Who probably counts too, but I haven't seen any of it and just know what others have said.
When it comes to actual products and physical goods, some of those are almost definitely being sponsored due to being given them as "gifts" or things like that. When it comes to media I think the people who just do "react" videos are mostly just trying to ride the waves of popularity.
I suggest watching this video which goes over a lot of influence that happened over Christmas. It goes over the very interesting detail that very many well known "Christmas songs" were not written by Christians at all.
The commercialization of Christmas as well as other holidays is definitely something that was not very Christian in nature.
The otherkin or "trans-species" are the real hurdle to overcome. Nobody with an ounce of sanity can entertain the concept, at least at the moment. I could envision a scenario where somebody could be "convinced" to accept it, just like the transsexualism has already. The only real question is if society can withstand that immense level of counterfactualism.
There are federated social media sites like poa.st which work decently at combating censorship if you want a twitter alternative. If you want you can set up your own instance, but bigger ones can easily blacklist it. At the very least you won't be removed entirely, just quarantined with other undesirables.
Ubisoft is totally compromised, just look at the recent Watch Dogs and Assassins Creed games.
It's important to know that companies that are only buying into progressive politics to avoid controversy are also compromised by low level employees. They will continue to get pressured from them as well as from up above by banks and government to implement more "diversity" until the upper management has been totally subverted as well.
Basically if they have staff that speak in English and have an HR department they are on the path to being totally ruined.
The word "racism" is something that has been invented in the last 100 years, with the almost sole purpose of damaging cohesion in European societies. Before that there was the term "racialist" but "racist" was the word being used internationally.
And when it comes to attacks like that you can do both. If your group does something good they can respond with "Well what even is X anyways?" and at the same time paint it as evil by saying "Look at all the bad stuff X group has done!"
It's all for the same purpose. Do not expect people using arguments like that to have a logical foundation. They will use anything they can to attack their enemies.
Just use a screenshot since they have stuff that covers it up in archives.
It's especially hard to see when truth is omitted, but if you look in aggregate from a lot of places the missing details add up. It becomes very apparent when you notice them all starting to push the same narrative at the same time.
Yes, that's why he was recommended to run for Prime Minister by those oligarchs and Yeltsin. It's just that he wasn't as friendly to them as they expected. It's obvious that you can't just steal from a country forever, you actually need to build it up too.
Recently this video came out which explains the Russian oligarchs who basically plundered Russia from 1990-2000 under Yeltsin. It was Putin that stopped this and arrested them, that's why they hate him.
One interesting thing is that about 10000-7000 years ago there was a massive loss of males and then a huge jump back up but this didn't happen with females.
"Nazi" as a term never had real meaning, it was an insult towards the National Socialists because it sounded like Ignatz which was a rural name, and based on the existing term of Sozi which was what the Social Democrats were called.
The NSDAP never referred to themselves as nazis, other than some ones who "wanted to take it back" because it was always intended as a slur or insult.
Otherwise it would only have meant members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, and that ended with WWII.
I never liked him, even when he was saying stuff I agreed with about companies bad practices. He is an attention whore who just wanted the limelight and to feel right. The fact that he has gone for the trans bullshit is nothing surprising. If anything I hope his status helps wake up some onlookers who want to keep things "neutral" and deny reality.
I never said one man was responsible, just a driving force. The USA's special agencies testing and spreading drugs during the 60-70's were a large factor as well when it comes to societal change. Of course the media and news as well, on what they decided to cover and how it was done.