I don't expect them to do anything, like I said I do not believe they will do any real resistance to the people in power. If any news organization had legitimate cause they would be supporting white people explicitly. Any organization that is not chiefly pro-white will be supporting anti-white causes.
I firmly believe that Rebel News is controlled opposition, in a similar vein as Fox News. They are meant to play the bad guy for the establishment and draw support from dissidents, but overall they will do nothing that actually threatens or harms the regime. They might have individual editors or people who have done good work, but I have zero faith in the management.
This Vertigo Politix video is a bit old but it goes over it well.
The left/progressives can only either "joke" about their ideology which basically acts as an infodump about how they are right and everybody else is wrong, or they need to be approved to laugh at a joke otherwise they may be attacked for enjoying something offensive or problematic.
This means their memes are either unfunny and target that extreme idological niche, or unfunny and extremely watered down to the point that they are nothing new. No experimentation allowed, no pushing of boundaries, because that would end up as wrongthink. Stay in your area and laugh at the acceptable material comrade.
It's because context can be more powerful than content. It doesn't matter what the truth is exactly, if you can bend and spin something to make your narrative stronger then you can more easily influence other people. This is the "big lie" in action.
In fact if you stand against the truth, because admitting the truth would damage your narrative. The most effective thing is to take an exactly opposite stance to it. This is because most people trust things based on consensus. So if everybody is saying the same thing, it becomes easier to say it yourself.
The anti-white, anti-male, and anti-christian narratives make it so they can never admit those groups helped create Western society as we know it today. They must be blamed for everything, even things that they were trying to prevent.
Yeah it's a pretty weak virtue signal. If they really wanted some attention they should have let her come, and then bombarded her with questions about trans. Create a public struggle session, but of course that requires some level of balls to actually pull off.
Ironically this image which is supposed to deride white people does a decent summary of Western culture.
Something pro-white is anything good for white people overall. Letting white people have their own spaces, being able to honestly speak their mind and not feel eternal guilt over their race.
This is something I've been saying for a while now. Framing others as "racist" will never accomplish anything because whites are considered inherently racist and evil. The onlookers will not change their mind in any way because they can just say "You're a bigger racist!" to the white person. No amount of proving how anti-racist you are will work, it will never be enough.
Instead you need to point out when people are being anti-white, and contrast that with things that are pro-white. If you do this then the other person will either make it clear they are anti-white, or avoid the issue with some kind of excuse.
They're still using "Stop the spread" huh. I think we're well past that at this point.
The only real ways to stop a virus from spreading is by closing down borders and quarantining people coming into it. You don't lock down everybody to do that.
Democracy in it's truest sense is: Those who can most manipulate the voters have the greatest power.
This is why having women (and weak men) in politics, voting or in positions of power, is dangerous. They are highly susceptible to groupthink, and think far more with their emotions and consensus than reason, logic, and actual truth.
That is why voter maps like this exist.
I still firmly think that the shift towards masks and fearmongering was done first and most immediately for the sake of mail in ballots, and then for the sake of overall population control with things like vaccines and treatment, money is a factor but less of one.
The people running the country have had essentially unlimited money for a long time now. It's only so useful.
Yeah, it can be easy to go in the opposite direction and immediately take the opposite stance the media makes but that would be playing into their game as well.
Instead of the old "Trust but verify" the stance has to be "Doubt but investigate"
This is a 1967 comic for instance. The media has been doing the same tricks for a very long time.
The KKK was a group to try and protect white interests. Not to say they were justified in everything. I'm willing to believe that they were smeared in the exact same way that Trump, America First, the Proud Boys, etc, are now today.
Of course they were infiltrated as every kind of secret society is, and that's why you have Hillary Clinton fraternizing with KKK members in recent years. It doesn't mean that she's secretly a white nationalist, just that the organization was entirely subverted to the point that it's nearly indistinguishable from anti-white internationalists now.
The only perspective that is relevant in the modern day is if something is anti-white or if it is pro-white. Everything else derives from that.
Alicia Garza is ethnically black but grew up in a Jewish family as Alicia Schwartz, and she identifies as Jewish.
Yes, you wanted to know if this journalist was transsexual and I clarified that they were just Jewish. I know you mostly post in TheDonald, but this is not an issue that can be sidestepped. It will be pointed out every time and if you care about the truth you will begin to see the patterns as well.
With a name like Moskowitz you can't be too surprised.
The far left and the far right are in agreement here, free speech essentially leads to fascism, the only question is if that is a good thing or not.