I think it was just a ditch that you normally see on the side of rural roads for water drainage. He stood in the ditch (which was "flooded" and a few feet lower in elevation, by intentional design), even though the surrounding area was largely fine.
Steam isn't neutral, though. Their moderation skews heavily left wing. They claim that the game companies hire the moderators for their own forums, but I haven't seen one example of right leaning moderation, but I've seen tons of left wing moderation. All manner of vile, caustic, and even threatening speech can be used by lefties in Steam forums, but if you dare question globohomo one millimeter outside the accepted boundaries, your post or comment will be removed. And Steam never stops it, at least as far as I've heard.
ADL, as per usual, is just kvetching that Steam and the mods aren't clamping down even more on "hate speech", wanting to censor people more than they already are.
There's legitimate evidence that Obama did use a fake birth certificate, but I hadn't heard about the connection to Sandy Hook. Sheriff Joe Arpaio (a very vocal Obama critic at the time) did a long investigation into Obama, and his team found legit fraud and fakery on the publicly presented birth certificate. There's other info involving his father being different than what is claimed, someone connected to the fake certificate dying in a freak airplane accident, Obama himself claiming to be foreign born on his college transcripts, and such... But in any case, here's the press conference Arpaio did on their findings:
There was also a SNAFU by the news media. They were filming in front of one of the buildings (I can't remember which one) with the typical reporter reporting on the ground spiel. In the background of that news report, were a lot of people moving from left to right (if memory serves me correctly). I assume this was done to promote the idea of lots of people being affected. However, at one point, the idiot news crew did a wide shot of the exact same scene, but from the air via a news helicopter, which showed the commotion of background people were all circling the building, in line, repeatedly. The same tactic is used with extras in TV and movies to suggest a large crowd in the background, enabling the producers to use fewer people and save money.
To be fair, he didn't say he stopped caring entirely, only that he stopped caring about "these fools fighting".
Or putting up giant whiteout boards over glass to prevent anyone looking at the pollsters, or observe what they were doing.
Thanks for the clarification. I agree. There are a lot of Christians, or people in general, that try to explain away or minimize suffering, within the context of my warnings about it (as highlighted in my lengthy initial comment).
And I was trying to honestly... just try to do something to help heal some of the divide. I've been trying to do that for myself in my own personal life, still have some long lasting baggage with religion, but I try to recognize that my sometimes instinctive knee-jerk reaction is both rushed and often times misplaced blame.
Thank you. I try to do the same. That's why I generally try to remain amicable despite some incredibly toxic comments I get (not you, but there are a lot of users on this site, and many other social media sites) that are nothing but toxic. I only recently came back to Christianity, being agnostic most of my life. Only after fully realizing the answers to some very deep questions, and understanding how truth is nearly synonymous to God, did I fully understand and convert back to Christianity. I was raised Christian as a kid, to clarify. But, there are some extremely vitriolic anti-Christians, that do nothing but misquote scripture and try to lay blame for all the world's ills at our feet. It's maddening, but understandable given the current atmosphere, propaganda, and that the people in power are vociferously anti-Christian.
Given the forces and evil arrayed against us, I try to stay on peaceful terms with my neighbors and people who aren't Christian, so as to work together for common cause. Given how anti-Christian many of them can be, it's difficult sometimes. In any case, this is why I explain things from a non-Christian and Christian perspective, because the logic works both ways. Most of my writings are written from a non-Christian perspective, as that's who I was prior to realizing the connection.
While Leather Apron Club enumerated a few decent points, I don't think he touched on the most pertinent reasons for not voting. Here is why I'm not voting this election, even though I've voted right wing my entire life (with one caveat, I still advocate for voting in local elections):
(1)
Both political parties are corrupt and controlled by the same people.
The people in power know that the best way to control a populace is to give them the illusion of choice and resistance, a false choice dichotomy, where no matter what choice we pick, we lose, and the people in power win, where politics is curated into a gilded cage, an overton window where debate is vicious, but completely controlled.
This has become ridiculously obvious the last several years, that the mainstream political right is nothing more than a false choice trap, a "boil alive slower" choice, a "move left just a bit slower" choice, a "we'll genocide White people, but 'legally'" choice. The mainstream right has compromised, given ground, and acquiesced to every single issue for the last several decades. Every time the mainstream right is in power, they may push back on one or two issues, but in totality, they still progress the globalist agenda and Kalergi plan.
In general, once enough people realize the charade, and exfiltrate themselves from the corrupt and controlled system, parties, and leaders, they look for and form their own dissident groups, to try to advance effectual solutions. The left tried to do this with Occupy Wallstreet. The right tried to do this with the Tea Party and MAGA movements. They've all been infiltrated and corrupted. The people in power infiltrate and corrupt these groups, slowly bringing them back into the fold of the controlled system, the overton window, completely neutering the group from being effectually resistant to the system.
The other way the people in power control us, is by giving us false saviors/leaders. These false saviors can be bred and trained, completely artificial, wolves in sheep clothing, or they can be genuine, but are weak and stupid, incapable of actually fixing our problems because their policies and ideas are decades too late, or don't take into consideration everything that's happening, often shilling several false philosophies and ideas of the corrupt system (like feminism, egalitarianism, race blindness, etc.). At first, these leaders say the right things, to condense the dissident right under their banner, but over time, their intensity, ideas, and policies become less severe, moving the dissidents under their banner back under the control of the system. With genuine, but weak, leaders, the people in power artificially prop them up, and censor and quash any effectual alternative leaders, so the people overwhelmingly are more likely to only see the false leader(s) offered to us, making the dissident populace mostly congregate around the false leader(s), rather than the effectual ones. Whether Trump is truly artificial, or a genuine but weak leader, is unknown. There's evidence to point either way. What's clear, though, is he doesn't go far enough, and at most, is merely a delaying tactic for what actually needs to happen, making people slightly less uncomfortable for a few years, which is the worst possible thing we could do right now (detailed more below).
It should be obvious that politics is nothing more than theater, like watching pro wrestling or pro sports, which is entirely scripted. People cast their vote for red team or blue team, even though they both work for the the people in power, and dupe us into thinking they work for our interests, when in fact they're actively harming us, and keeping us from from realizing the truth.
I should also remark, since many here will probably retort: "but they tried to kill Trump". Most likely, yes, even though there's some evidence to suggest those attempts were staged (like no wound to Trump's ear). But, even if these attempted assassinations were genuine, it must be understood that the people in power aren't completely monolithic. They have disparate goals, interests, and pathways, which often cause friction within their group. These disparate groups often war with each other, but regardless of who wins, we lose. Given that the people in power hold every anti-virtue possible, it's only natural that they remain a fractured group with constant in fighting. So, Trump could easily be a false choice leader propped up by one group, but a different group is actively trying to stop him.
(2)
People only wake up and fix problems when they're uncomfortable.
Comfort is the enemy of action. Comfortable people are made apathetic, pacifistic, and inactive in the face of lies, tyranny, and evil. This is one of the reasons why Western civilization has been able to be so corrupted and degenerate. We have all manner of comforts, technologies, bread and circuses, dopamine sinks, barriers to nature (keeping nature from reprising against stupidity and weakness), relative abundance, wealth, and safety. This comfort has pacified and weakened the public, enabling extremely malicious people to infiltrate and corrupt every institution against us. If our ancestors were alive right now, they would've revolted and killed everyone responsible decades ago, if not longer.
The only reason so many people have woken up to the truth and rejected the lies the last several years is because they were made uncomfortable. The people in power, in their hubris, pushed too far too fast. They turned up the temperature of the boiling pot we're all sitting in, and lots of people realized "hey, we're being boiled alive" and jumped out. Under the weight of all the lies, our lives have been made a living hell, and the lies no longer make sense. People were forced, due to discomfort, to reject the lies, reevaluate, and seek alternative ideas, information, arguments, and explanations for why things are the way they are. Comfortable people don't change their minds. Why would they?
The false choice right, and the false leaders we're being offered, at best, will merely make people slightly less uncomfortable for a few years, while keeping the Kalergi plan in full swing and advancing the globalist agenda, while only pushing back on a few small things. The mainstream right is a "boil slower, but still boil alive" alternative. Making people less uncomfortable now, is the worst thing we could do to ourselves. It could conceivably stop the red pill movement for a few years while they're in charge, neutering our movement, giving credence to the false philosophies, ideas, and agendas offered to us by the false choice right.
(3)
We deserve to feel pain for our inaction.
Government only exists upon the will of the governed. It's our natural right to govern ourselves. We only abdicate our natural rights, and give them to government to do things in our stead, in the hopes that they apply things more fairly (like justice), that they protect our natural rights, and act in our own interests. Western governments aren't doing this. They've become extremely and blatantly antagonistic to us, and are actively seeking to exterminate us, while also weakening, brainwashing, lying, gaslighting, poisoning, manipulating, dividing, shaming, degrading, and making us poor. They're actively destroying everything and everyone we love. They're making the entire world ugly and evil. They're lying to us about literally everything, from medicine, to healthcare, to "science", to biology, sex, the roles of men and women, philosophy, entertainment, and history.
If you can't fix a corrupted system through that system, then it's your (our) job to fix it ourselves. It's no one else's responsibility to fix our problems. It's ours, and ours alone. Casting a vote for a false leader is a continuation of the false solution people have been seeking for decades, thinking that one person, or a few people, in the right position, can fix all of our problems. Given how systemic, evil, and corrupt all of our institutions are, it's incredibly naive to think one person, or even a handful of people, can fix all of this.
This mindset is also inherently lazy and apathetic, all the hallmarks of people trying to cling to the last vestiges of their comforts, because they know that fixing these problems ourselves will be painful, even though it's necessary, and has been for a long time. Bodies at rest tend to stay at rest. This is true for everything, including people. People are loath to get up off their ass and actually fix things themselves, especially when they're comfortable. Better to just call someone to do things for us.
We've been attempting that solution for decades. Where has it gotten us? The world has only gotten worse and worse. If you attempt the same failed solution over and over, you're a moron and deserve to fail. If you continue to make the same mistake, you deserve to feel pain for that mistake. Abdication of our responsibilities is what's led us here. Expecting other people to save us is what's led us here. You can't fix a problem by acting in the same way which caused the problem in the first place. The longer we let a problem fester, the worse the solution becomes. We're now at a stage where the problems are so bad, so systemic, that we only have one option left.
But, we have the right, and we've always had the right, to reclaim our natural rights and responsibilities. We can, at any moment and whim, tell the government to fuck off, and [rule 2] the people harming us. The U.S. was founded on this principle. If we're unwilling to do that now, even thought we live in a country founded on revolution, we absolutely deserve to be ruled by tyrants. Pacifism in the face of evil only leads to destruction. Remaining silent in the face of lies on leads to more lies. Good people who do nothing to stop evil and lies, aren't actually good people.
(4)
The Kalergi plan.
Even though White people are the only demographic that votes for the right in majority, I haven't heard a single right wing politician (except 2 local ones just this year) explicitly espouse for White ethnic interests beyond extremely vague rhetoric and policies (like improving the economy). However, the mainstream right has actively, repeatedly, and explicitly expressed interest in supporting and passed policies for non-white groups, and has repeatedly told their voting base (White people) that we must be "big tent", or "we won't survive". Not only is this an admission that they know the Kalergi plan (the systematic replacement and genocide of White people in our own countries, through open borders and mass non-white immigration) is taking place, but they're actively endorsing it by catering to our replacements, and shaming White people into accepting our own genocide.
Furthermore, the mainstream right actively participates in facilitating the Kalergi plan, by keeping the borders open and mass non-white immigration flowing, with the only vocal push back being "so long as we're replaced legally". The mainstream right, in coordination with the openly globalist left, also actively censors any discussion of race realism, the fact that nations are built on its people, that you can't change the people of the nation without changing the nation, that you can't transplant a unique people to a different location and expect them to act completely differently, that there's no such thing as magic dirt, and that White people have the right to collectivize and espouse for our ethnic interests. We're also being viciously shamed for any form of racism, even on things that aren't racist. We're being labeled inherently racist and evil, that we're colonizers, inherently evil, and owe every non-white on the planet our money, hard work, property, homes, and our very lives. We're shamed and censored if we dare disagree with any of this, even if we advocate for our own survival
White people are being denied our natural rights, to associate with whom we choose, to protect ourselves, our loved ones, our communities, and our people/nation, the ability to have our own homes/nations, the ability to protect the borders of our own homes/nations, the ability to gatekeep out undesirables (for any reason), and the right to fight back against our oppressors, natural rights that are granted to everyone else.
Why should any self respecting White person continually vote for leaders and parties that are actively participating in our genocide, and preventing us from stopping it? Trump has actively espoused anti-White sentiments and policies this election cycle. He views racism and antisemitism has evil, that White people collectivizing is bad and should be punished, and that he wants the biggest immigration numbers ever.
Delaying the necessary action to stop this only serves the people in power. Every year we wait to act gradually decreases the White population and increases the non-white population. The people in power are hoping that by the time White people act, we'll be in such a small minority that we'll have almost no chance of winning. They run war games on possible civil war/revolt scenarios, and they show that every time we get violent, the entire house of cards falls, they lose all power, and we win. They're hoping to stave off the violence for as long as possible. They use their false choice parties and leaders to advocate for pacifism and "vote harder [current year]", and call anyone calling for action outside the controlled and curated confines of the corrupted system "feds", even though the feds don't want us to fight back. They want us to continue to using the corrupted systems.
(5)
Participating in a corrupted system, tacitly places your approval on that system.
Every time you vote, even though we know the votes are rigged, and the parties and leaders are corrupt, you rubber stamp all of it with your approval. In addition, this tacit approval also hinders any discussion, collectivization, and action against that system. What do MAGA right wingers say when people like me advocate for revolt? I'm a "fed". I'm a "loser". I'm a "democrat operative". "Vote anyway".
I refuse to participate in a system I know is corrupt. I refuse to cast my support behind people actively trying to kill me and my people. I refuse to compromise with half truths and outright lies. I refuse.
The lesser evil has only lead us here. Compromise with lies has only lead us here. You don't correct a lie by acquiescing to some of it, making it easier to swallow for fools and cowards. You tell the truth, and only the truth. You don't fix a problem by continuing to operate in falsehoods and lies. You can only fix a problem through truth, and only the truth. Every single time a good person compromises, we're dragged down to hell, one inch at a time.
There is only one way out of this.
"Don't feed the animals", say the signs in national forests and wildlife refuges. If you make people (or animals) dependent on things they didn't earn, you weaken them. As I tried to warn in my much longer comment further up, this can also be passed on civilizationally and generationally, where people get used to what they have, and perpetually want for more.
Not everyone is equal. Difference necessarily means people are unequal. You can't have both, even though modern political thought says we're all the same, that we're blank slates (tabula rasa), and all our actions are due to environmental factors. It's objectively false. If it was true, men and women would be equal, and biological differences would only arise due to "socio-economic" factors. The environment does play a factor, but not as much as other variables.
In any case, I'd venture a safe guess that this is probably why many black Africans hate African-Americans. Black Africans don't have (or didn't come from a place that had) all the welfare programs, and weren't spoiled like blacks are here, so they see them as spoiled welfare queens purely dependent upon government gibs. Using welfare used to be associated with societal shame, as a means to reduce its use unless you absolutely needed it for an emergency. But now? It's practically celebrated in many non-white communities. They brag about how much welfare they get, and brag about cheating the system. They take out of the system far, far more than they ever put back in. They're hypocrites, expecting other people to treat them better than they treat them in return, expecting other people to maintain civilization that they themselves drag down, expecting other people to work so they can be a wallow in slothful behavior, stealing the altruism and efforts of better people.
Welfare is meant to be for those truly in need, where one's neighbors, community, and people truly love one another, and help and provide for one another when in need. Welfare, as with all modern things the government has taken control of, has corrupted this naturally healthy communal outlet for help, and twisted it to maintain the dregs of society, people that don't deserve it, and perpetually take advantage of it. Past nations had a great method for dealing with such people: banishment. These people are actively taking advantage of us, actively harming us, and don't share our values or can maintain our systems. At minimum, the most merciful punishment they deserve is deportation, preferably to a nation where they demographically belong to.
Well written thanks. One point I would disagree with though is the suffering of the rich being pretend.
I only meant that many rich people, at least nowadays, pretend to suffer to play into the victim narrative that current globalist Western philosophy is pushing. The above quote of Cardi B is proof of that, and I've seen all manner of "woe is me" remarks from incredibly rich people who want for nothing. But...
As you said, hedonistic adaptation and the like are part of human nature. If you objectively live a pampered life, but your brain says "you're depressed", then you're depressed. Our subjective feelings are not based on facts. We feel what we feel, whether or not it makes sense.
I also agree with this. Self inflicted depression, whether factual or not, is a terrible experience. I would know, as I've been through it, so severe that I was about a millimeter away from killing myself (quite literally), when I was 15. The only thing that stopped me was love for my dad. I didn't want him to find me like that. Depression is terrible, but it's also a symptom of improper living, or improper society. That doesn't mean all depression is, but the depression rates for modern society are astronomically larger than when our ancestors lived harder lives. Proper diet, getting enough sleep, getting sunlight and being out in nature, getting exercise, having neighbors and a healthy community of people that are like you, having a loving wife and kids, these things engender well being and stave off depression. But modern society is designed to not produce, condone, or prosper these things, in fact modern society tries to achieve the antithesis, to keep people weakened and easily controlled.
That specific user is a vociferous anti-Christian. He constantly misquotes scripture, often interpreting it to mean the opposite of what is says, and then when confronted with a refutation, refuses to acknowledge it, no matter how well laid out it is. There's lots of examples of him doing so in c/consumeproduct.
I thought I worded my initial comment well enough that it could be viewed through a Christian lens, or through an atheist or agnostic lens. The logic is sound and the relevant remarks on human behavior are blatantly obvious. But, since the above user is anti-Christian, he only wants to challenge what I said because I mentioned God in it, and presented an explanation for why God wouldn't intervene in human suffering.
I was also not implying that all suffering can be dismissed, or is equal. There's a clear distinction and difference between different forms and magnitudes of suffering. Some people truly do suffer terrible things in this life. We see all manner of such things posted here daily.
Sure thing. Hopefully in the not too distant future, I'll be making my own posts with stuff like this, as I parse out my 2 books and release them a chapter at a time. It's relatively simple stuff, but stuff that far too many people have forgotten, or don't realize, and will help people understand the world, and more importantly, hopefully make better decisions.
If you really want to know...
Humans are designed to suffer. Suffering is an intrinsic quality of life. As mortal, finite, imperfect creatures suffering is inevitable, as we can't perfectly control our surroundings, and since we're at the mercy of our surroundings, we're sometimes harmed by it (i.e. naturals disasters, or merely chance bad luck).
However, it goes deeper than that. We don't have perfect memories. What happens to people over time? We get used to our current condition. Over time, we take what we have for granted. Interestingly, this subject also partly answers a fundamental question/challenge to religion (usually aimed squarely at Christianity): if God is all powerful and loves us, why does he allow us to suffer? So, I'll frame it to answer that question, and then connect it back to how society and people operate.
Let's pretend that humanity is suffering, and we cry out to God "woe is me". God comes down and eliminates the worst half of human suffering from existence. Now, people can only experience the top half of human experience, from neutral to pure bliss/happiness. People are overjoyed. They praise and thank God for his mercy. Then, over time, the joy, praise, and thankfulness wanes. They get used to their current condition. They take it for granted. Over people's lifetimes, perhaps over generations of not properly passing on their knowledge, wisdom, and memories, people forget how well they have it. Over enough time, people begin to equate the new scope of human experience within the suffering vs joy frame. People can see there is variance in human experience, that some live better than others, and some experience the (new) worst things. How dare God let people suffer such affronts, such horrible things as these? If God truly loved us, he would intervene, and prevent our suffering. God relents again, and comes down to remove the (new) worst half of human suffering, such that now only the top 25% of human experience is possible. People are overjoyed. They praise and thank God for his mercy. The cycle repeats.
We get used to our current condition. We take all that we have for granted. We compare differences in experience, and lament when things don't go our way. Our imperfect memory and ability to pass on knowledge betrays us. It doesn't matter how much God could intervene and remove any amount of suffering. Unless all human experience is made equal, at some point, someone would complain. Equality of experience, of outcomes, is impossible. In an infinite universe, where different locations result in different variables, equality of experience would require, either all positions and variances within the universe to be the same, such that, ultimately, the universe had no effect on people or was equal everywhere, or that all people inhabit the same location at all times, such that each person experiences the exact same thing. Both are impossible (at least for us), is some variant of a hellish existence, would completely unravel the universe, and/or would completely defeat the purpose of there being more than one of us, and for each of us to be unique and different.
Notice how this jealous forgetful mindset pervades modern Western thought? We're at the peak of civilization. We have all manner of technology, wealth, wonders, conveniences, safeties, and barriers to nature. And yet, people still lament their suffering, take what they have for granted, and want for more. Look at what our ancestors had and what they had to deal with only 100-200 years ago. No running water. No indoor plumbing. No electricity. No air conditioning or central heating. Most had to grow, slaughter, and cook their own food. No cars. No computers. No phones. No video games. No TV. Medicine was primitive by comparison. Untold suffering was abundant. And yet, they persisted, thrived, and overcame. All the things they built, invented, and achieved, we now take for granted.
This leads to another observation, that the more our suffering is removed and redefined upward, the weaker we become. I'd argue, quite easily that our ancestors were tougher than us. They could endure far more and thrive in spite of it. However, also notice how the insulated political left perpetually bitches about greater and greater minutiae? Nothing is ever enough for them (or for us). No matter how much we prostrate and bend to their demands and lamentations, it's never enough. This mindset is wholly connected to our ability to take things for granted. The current political left is philosophically focused on equality, the equalization of human experience, even though it's impossible. They've even framed unequal outcomes as somehow being the result of oppressors being at fault, and White people being forever labelled as those oppressors, as we seem to always have it better than non-whites. Most here (in right wing spaces) see what the left is doing, reject it, and in some small way try to do the right thing, of not taking for granted what they do, of bitching about infinitely small minutiae. But, if people were being honest, even right wingers would have to admit they still take a great many things for granted. It's just that the left is much farther along the "woe is me" path, and cemented the premise of it (the search for equality) into their politics and philosophy.
Still, the mindset of the quoted person in OP's screenshot goes a step further. Greed. It's a motivation associated with someone who intentionally forgets what they have, who intentionally isn't thankful, and always wants for more, every second of their lives. It might be one of the worst ways to live, where one's own mind is always stealing their joy. But, it's obvious that most/many of these people are happy, in some way. Currently, the rich just have to put on a charade to pretend they're suffering, to artificially insert themselves back into that false oppressor/oppressed globalist paradigm. "I'm suffering just like you", says the spoiled brat millionaire.
A lot of this is artificially pushed, false philosophies that keep us weakened, but a lot of it, the lion's share, is just natural human behavior. It's also a natural consequence of the rise and fall of civilizations. We're currently past the peak, have forogtten our forefather's lessons, became corrupted with comfortable falsehoods and lies, and now we're sliding toward collapse, under the weight of all the anti-truth. The higher a civilization climbs, the faster and harder it will fall, generally speaking.
The only way I can conceive of preventing this process, is by concrete societal institutions and traditions that pass on knowledge and wisdom, to make it much harder to forget how far we've come, implementing methods to somehow instill what it means to truly suffer (like rites of passage for the young, or annual events designed to take away all our comforts), and to pray every day, to remain cognizant and thankful for all the things we have. But, given human nature, these are probably just delaying tactics for a future civilizational collapse.
Really weird that both Hiroshima and Nagasaki had the largest concentrations of Christian's in Japan at the time. Hmmmmmm.
Because starving people will eat absolute garbage, and due to a lack of options, will tolerate it.
Every medium of media and entertainment has become infected and the quality has massively collapsed. What people used to enjoy, now leaves a bitter taste in their mouth. But, since the infection has been so widespread, it's difficult to find alternatives. Since people are reluctant to change habits, and creating, researching, and seeking alternatives is difficult, people are more likely to accept the bad stuff. The degrade in quality, in terms of the people making this stuff, also results in fewer products being released, which results in the people becoming starved for it, so will be more willing to accept the bad stuff. A starving person will almost never turn down terrible food.
This limitation on products, much less good products, has become really apparent in gaming, and even moreso in specific genres, like RTS games, which used to be common and almost universally great games back in the 90s and 00s. But, this phenomenon goes way beyond gaming.
This is what I've heard of Baldur's Gate 3, that even if you ignore the woke and degenerate stuff, the late game wasn't polished or finished.
Except this time, they've intentionally eroded every nation which would've come to their defense, and antagonized the only people who've ever helped them, genociding ua in our own countries.
No one will come to the defense of jews this time around, or at least no one with an effectual military.
Is this not identical to the obfuscation and attack against the people bringing light to the "satanic panic" back in the 90s and early 00s? I wonder why the people in power would want to deflect and diminish the sexualization and rape of children? Hmmmmmmmmm.
They want and intend to do more damage. The Kalergi plan isn't finished.
The only reason the extremely corrupt current Western leaders are slowing down non-white immigration is because they've seen the astonishing acceleration of White people waking up, that we're realizing the truth and talking about it openly, even in the face of censorship and having our lives ruined for daring to question the foundational tenets of the new world religion. The evils have become blatant, the propaganda makes zero sense, and the slide toward civilizational collapse is making more and more people uncomfortable, which is the one thing that awakens a populace that has been dulled by propaganda, bread and circuses, and poisons of every flavor. More and more White people are also openly embracing the most abhorrent sins that exists under the new world religion: being racist if you're White, espousing for White collective interests, and wanting the same natural rights that are granted to everyone else (the right to live, the right to defend ourselves, the right to defend our family, neighbors, and people, the right to associate with our own people, the right to protect our homes/nations, the right to control who enters our homes/nations, the right to gatekeep out undesirables, the right to keep what's ours, the right to have our own nations, the right to elect our own representatives and governments which espouse for and protect our interests, etc.).
The people in power know that if White people collectivize and push back, violence becomes inevitable, and that every possible violent scenario leads to them losing, and us winning. So, they're trying to slow boil us for as long as possible, and slow roll any potential backlash to their plans, so that it doesn't become violent, or that the violence occurs so late in the process that we've become such an extreme minority in our own lands, that we have almost no hope of winning.
Thus, they're only slowing down current mass non-white immigration in the hopes that the current populace, or future generations, will grow accustomed to it, and then they'll push non-white immigration again and finish the Kalergi plan.
What about demonitized Youtubers who express wrong think, the ones which can only make money from crowd sourcing (like Patreon)? Do you expect them to vet every single donation?
While people should be careful with who they're dealing with, you're putting undue responsibility on innocent people, for fear of corrupt government backlash. The problem isn't the people. The problem is corrupt government. You can't expect people to continually jump through more and more hoops, and not forsee that even the best of us will trip up eventually, all to appease corrupt lying satanic pedophiles in government.
Invasions, infiltrations, corruptions, propaganda, and genocides happen in stages. You don't jump to the end stage, or the frogs jump out of the pot. The initial advertising of sex in media was to get men hooked on porn. It worked. Now that men are hooked on porn (which is freely available all over the internet), they've shifted mainstream media to demoralization and normalization of ugliness. This is what the Soviets did to demoralize their people through architecture (brutalism).
Video content creators who talk about anything not approved by the establishment don't get ad revenue from their content. Youtube will still play the ads on their videos, but keep all the ad revenue. The only way those content creators can make any money off of making content is through advertisers that sponsor the videos, where the content creator will shill for the service or product in video. It's extremely common for guntubers, homesteaders, and anyone to the right of Stalin.
All a government would have to do is "sponsor" a video for a content creator, lie about where the money comes from, and bam, you magically have "foreign influence", and the content creator unknowingly becomes a "foreign agent". There would be no realistic way for a content creator to vet where the money comes from. Most are usually just happy to pay the bills, as Youtube actively censors their content and prevents it from gaining the traction it otherwise would, due to the "algorithm", just like Google does with wrongthink.
Meh, I'm willing to endure a lot more pain when it comes to shipping if I know the company and items I'm purchasing are worth it. Next day shipping? I don't care if it's Chinesium garbage. I'm White and can plan ahead, so I'm even fine with 2-3 month shipping for a good product.
They don't care. They'll twist laws, conjure new ones, use unelected governmental beaurocrats to pass edicts, and use all manner of social pressure to stamp out ideas, words, actions, and people that are dangerous to them and their scheming.