Asking this because that’s why the feds are doing this to Alex Jones and it’s been so long that I honestly only remembered that because of the posts from earlier.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
There was also a SNAFU by the news media. They were filming in front of one of the buildings (I can't remember which one) with the typical reporter reporting on the ground spiel. In the background of that news report, were a lot of people moving from left to right (if memory serves me correctly). I assume this was done to promote the idea of lots of people being affected. However, at one point, the idiot news crew did a wide shot of the exact same scene, but from the air via a news helicopter, which showed the commotion of background people were all circling the building, in line, repeatedly. The same tactic is used with extras in TV and movies to suggest a large crowd in the background, enabling the producers to use fewer people and save money.
Remember (unrelated) Anderson Cooper wearing fishing trousers and standing in a particularly deep pothole or something to make it look like floodwaters were waist deep, meanwhile the wide shot showed people fifty yards away standing up just fine in maybe ankle deep water.
Or kneeling in the water. Doesn't have to be a pothole.
It was definitely some kind of hole or ravine that was lower than the terrain of the surrounding area. Deliberately picked to spread fear porn.
I think it was just a ditch that you normally see on the side of rural roads for water drainage. He stood in the ditch (which was "flooded" and a few feet lower in elevation, by intentional design), even though the surrounding area was largely fine.