9
AntonioOfVenice 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's spelled out in English as well, though point taken, perhaps he cannot read English either. Such is the nature of cultural enrichment.

7
AntonioOfVenice 7 points ago +7 / -0

The editor in chief of the atlantic is jeffrey goldberg.

The guy who lied about Saddam having ties to Al Qaeda to lie the US into a war of aggression, and then 18 years later lied about Trump calling dead WW1 soldiers 'suckers'? That guy?

You can only fail upward if you lie for the regime.

7
AntonioOfVenice 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wait, what? Who?

Even for a connoisseur of media malpractice, it's hard to keep track of all their depredations.

7
AntonioOfVenice 7 points ago +7 / -0

The EU did the exact same thing, BTW. Set up an 'anti-disinformation' site which included facts where their 'rebuttal' was basically 'BUT WE ARE REALLY ANGRY ABOUT PEOPLE POINTING THIS OUT".

35
AntonioOfVenice 35 points ago +35 / -0

For five years, they not only foisted a dementia patient on the American people, covered up his corruption with lies from the 'intelligence' community, but also insisted that he is 'sharp as a tack'.

Now, when their girls never had any cognitive abilities to lose, they're suddenly interested in cognitive decline to the point that they claim that being on message (a.k.a. repetitive speech) is a sign of it.

The best term for the US and its lackeys in Europe is indeed 'Empire of Lies'.

7
AntonioOfVenice 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think most people who advocate for monarchy where it doesn't exist are somewhat simple-minded, but an advantage of monarchy over our collectivistic oligarchy is that the rulers will only sometimes be evil, and not always.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think this continues as "her spokesman said that she is not running on that questionnaire". Not even a denial or repudiation.

There is no depth to which they will not sink to stop Trump. Actual election interference and in-kind campaign contributions.

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is there anyone on the planet who has enough hatred for urinalists?

13
AntonioOfVenice 13 points ago +13 / -0

Transwomen aren't just guys in dresses. I can wear a dress, and that doesn't make me a transwoman.

Transwomen are guys in dresses who are also suicidal, mentally ill, and have a necrotic wound between their legs.

10
AntonioOfVenice 10 points ago +10 / -0

These folks don't believe in equal opportunity in joke targets any more than they believe in equal opportunity in university admissions.

9
AntonioOfVenice 9 points ago +10 / -1

He shows that he was the perfect guy to play George W. Bush, because he has the same IQ.

30
AntonioOfVenice 30 points ago +30 / -0

In May 2023, a 22-year-old man pleaded guilty to killing a 19-year-old man, Horace Lorenzo Anderson, inside CHOP the night of June 20, 2020. He was sentenced to 14 years in prison, followed by three years in community custody.

When you kill someone, you get half of what someone got who wasn't inside their precious House of Lobbyists on January 6.

In June 2021, Isaiah Thomas Willoughby, 36, pleaded guilty in federal court to setting a fire outside the abandoned Seattle Police East Precinct during CHOP, also known as the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone or CHAZ. He was sentenced to two years in prison.

An arsonists got less than the Q Shaman, who used no violence and upbraided people for taking cakes from the fridge.

Ultimately, four shootings, including the killings of Anderson and 16-year-old Antonio Mays Jr., were reported in and around the CHOP zone. No one has been charged in Mays’ death.

Black lives don't matter after all.

-2
AntonioOfVenice -2 points ago +1 / -3

Muslims co-opt Jesus the same way Christians co-opt all the Jewish prophets. They still at least feign respect for him, which is why Iran protested against France's desecration of the Last Supper.

I think in this case, it's a statement against Christianity and Christian culture.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just Muslim Arabs. If Christian Arabs chimped out over all the persecution they face, there'd be hell to pay.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

My understanding of things is that almost all of the early non-native populations in white European countries (like the UK, France, Spain, the Netherlands, etc) came from their colonies.

It's true for the UK and France. Less so for those other countries. And Germany (effectively) didn't have any colonies. Historical ties and language probably helped a lot more than 'guilt' in letting them in (besides, guilt is for the people and not for the governments that make policy), as there is almost none of that in my experience.

Which is to say, I totally see the “colonialism narrative” existing as part of the root cause of the current migration crisis in Europe, parallel to those other narratives discussed earlier, and likewise built on “national shame”.

It would have been possible, but it is not the case. Colonialism is not a salient issue, and many Europeans remain proud of their colonial history. WW2 plays a much bigger role, even though we were the victims!

Makes sense and seems like an improvement over the endless adhoc adhoms which tend to be the default - that is, as long as it never gets to the point of an attempted gaslight (“this is what sane people think!”). Not to say you do that, but it’s an easy trap to fall into.

It is, and it actually is something I do. But mostly online. It's so much easier to talk to people in real life, because you know them, they know you, you like each other. People in real life don't call me an FSB agent or a Jew or a black (or a white for that matter).

Also, when you can't get through to people no matter how good your arguments, then it's easy to think the other side is just stupid or think or insane.

Someone will have “insane” (to normies) opinion X, Y, and Z, but if you mention conspiracy W to them you’re either a retard or a shill.

People who believe in one 'conspiracy' are more likely to believe in others as well, but I think something that so called 'conspiracy theorists' tend to do poorly is judge the likelihood or feasibility of 'conspiracies'. It's as if their default mode of explanation is a conspiracy, as it is in the Middle East.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't deny that. It prevented a greater threat from emerging at the cost of a lesser threat - to US hegemony. That is a win for US hegemony.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +5 / -1

That is incredible.

Also, have you noticed that it's 'racism' when you bring up Hispanics when the talk is of illegals, or vice versa, but they do it at will?

Many of those 'Iowans with better food' don't like illegals...

BTW, Mexican food is Gawd-awful. Who are these people? The only Hispanics whose food I find acceptable are Brazilians and Argentinians.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›