It’s an emotional modifier, they know when their readers see it they’ll cry “deboonked” anytime it gets brought up again despite being completely accurate. They’ll pretend an answer during a questionnaire on policy… doesn’t indicate policy.
Pretty much, it's like how idiots use 'Trump sounds mean' as a reason not to vote for him, just bypassing any need to argue on policy.
It's these kinds of idiots that give monarchists and those that want to bring in a social credit score just a non Chinese version legitimacy if these are the idiots that can sway an election.
I think most people who advocate for monarchy where it doesn't exist are somewhat simple-minded, but an advantage of monarchy over our collectivistic oligarchy is that the rulers will only sometimes be evil, and not always.
So the context is MSM code for 'we don't know how to spin this'
It’s an emotional modifier, they know when their readers see it they’ll cry “deboonked” anytime it gets brought up again despite being completely accurate. They’ll pretend an answer during a questionnaire on policy… doesn’t indicate policy.
Pretty much, it's like how idiots use 'Trump sounds mean' as a reason not to vote for him, just bypassing any need to argue on policy.
It's these kinds of idiots that give monarchists and those that want to bring in a social credit score just a non Chinese version legitimacy if these are the idiots that can sway an election.
I think most people who advocate for monarchy where it doesn't exist are somewhat simple-minded, but an advantage of monarchy over our collectivistic oligarchy is that the rulers will only sometimes be evil, and not always.