WWII is a religion in the west, and as we can see with the reactions to a recent guest on Tucker's show, opinions outside accepted WWII dogma draw strong moral outrage. We all know that Official Narratives™ are always wrong, in some way, but normie land does not.
They weren't nitpicking. They were straight up lying in some cases.
For example, the guy claimed that Germans did not plan for the large numbers of POWs that they would capture in the USSR, and that these ended up dying. Now, this isn't right, because the Germans wanted the population of the USSR dead anyway (see General Plan Ost).
They claimed that he was talking about the Holocaust, which is false. They also claimed that it is wrong that the Germans often started murdering people because of overpopulation and because they couldn't feed them, which is acknowledged by mainstream historians.
They don't care about that guy. They want to discredit Tucker, who is a threat to the ruling class.
For example, the guy claimed that Germans did not plan for the large numbers of POWs that they would capture in the USSR, and that these ended up dying. Now, this isn't right, because the Germans wanted the population of the USSR dead anyway (see General Plan Ost).
I think we agree, but let me say:
The treatment of POWs isn't what the thread was about. Not even starvation of Europe. The thread is about a fat drunk named Winston Churchill.
WWII is a religion in the west, and as we can see with the reactions to a recent guest on Tucker's show, opinions outside accepted WWII dogma draw strong moral outrage. We all know that Official Narratives™ are always wrong, in some way, but normie land does not.
The attempts to deboonk that guy were pathetic. They wanted to nitpick irrelevant facts without addressing the broader narrative.
Mostly they just called everyone and anyone a Nazi though. It was on par with TD.win reactions to a Proud Boys rally.
They weren't nitpicking. They were straight up lying in some cases.
For example, the guy claimed that Germans did not plan for the large numbers of POWs that they would capture in the USSR, and that these ended up dying. Now, this isn't right, because the Germans wanted the population of the USSR dead anyway (see General Plan Ost).
They claimed that he was talking about the Holocaust, which is false. They also claimed that it is wrong that the Germans often started murdering people because of overpopulation and because they couldn't feed them, which is acknowledged by mainstream historians.
They don't care about that guy. They want to discredit Tucker, who is a threat to the ruling class.
I think we agree, but let me say:
The treatment of POWs isn't what the thread was about. Not even starvation of Europe. The thread is about a fat drunk named Winston Churchill.
I'm aware. Just giving an example of where they were blatantly lying about that Daryl fellow.