WWII is a religion in the west, and as we can see with the reactions to a recent guest on Tucker's show, opinions outside accepted WWII dogma draw strong moral outrage. We all know that Official Narratives™ are always wrong, in some way, but normie land does not.
The enormous lies surrounding both world wars are quite literally the foundation of the modern world. That's why we are bombarded daily with propaganda about WW2 since the end of the war. If the truth comes out the system will collapse over night.
They weren't nitpicking. They were straight up lying in some cases.
For example, the guy claimed that Germans did not plan for the large numbers of POWs that they would capture in the USSR, and that these ended up dying. Now, this isn't right, because the Germans wanted the population of the USSR dead anyway (see General Plan Ost).
They claimed that he was talking about the Holocaust, which is false. They also claimed that it is wrong that the Germans often started murdering people because of overpopulation and because they couldn't feed them, which is acknowledged by mainstream historians.
They don't care about that guy. They want to discredit Tucker, who is a threat to the ruling class.
Now, this isn't right, because the Germans wanted the population of the USSR dead anyway (see General Plan Ost).
Stop spreading that bullshit. Germany didn't even have enough settlers to properly resettle her eastern territories lost after WW1, which were partially ethnically cleansed by Poland, let alone the vast territories of the USSR. Operation Barbarossa was a preemptive strike against the bolshevik threat not an invasion to gain territory.
They also claimed that it is wrong that the Germans often started murdering people because of overpopulation and because they couldn't feed them, which is acknowledged by mainstream historians.
Stop spreading that bullshit. Germany didn't even have enough settlers to properly resettle her eastern territories lost after WW1, which were partially ethnically cleansed by Poland, let alone the vast territories of the USSR.
Who talked about 'resettling', let alone during a war? Fact is, the Germans wanted to starve the inhabitants of the USSR and brutalized them - as well as Soviet POWs.
Operation Barbarossa was a preemptive strike against the bolshevik threat not an invasion to gain territory.
For example, the guy claimed that Germans did not plan for the large numbers of POWs that they would capture in the USSR, and that these ended up dying. Now, this isn't right, because the Germans wanted the population of the USSR dead anyway (see General Plan Ost).
I think we agree, but let me say:
The treatment of POWs isn't what the thread was about. Not even starvation of Europe. The thread is about a fat drunk named Winston Churchill.
WWII is a religion in the west, and as we can see with the reactions to a recent guest on Tucker's show, opinions outside accepted WWII dogma draw strong moral outrage. We all know that Official Narratives™ are always wrong, in some way, but normie land does not.
The enormous lies surrounding both world wars are quite literally the foundation of the modern world. That's why we are bombarded daily with propaganda about WW2 since the end of the war. If the truth comes out the system will collapse over night.
The attempts to deboonk that guy were pathetic. They wanted to nitpick irrelevant facts without addressing the broader narrative.
Mostly they just called everyone and anyone a Nazi though. It was on par with TD.win reactions to a Proud Boys rally.
They weren't nitpicking. They were straight up lying in some cases.
For example, the guy claimed that Germans did not plan for the large numbers of POWs that they would capture in the USSR, and that these ended up dying. Now, this isn't right, because the Germans wanted the population of the USSR dead anyway (see General Plan Ost).
They claimed that he was talking about the Holocaust, which is false. They also claimed that it is wrong that the Germans often started murdering people because of overpopulation and because they couldn't feed them, which is acknowledged by mainstream historians.
They don't care about that guy. They want to discredit Tucker, who is a threat to the ruling class.
Stop spreading that bullshit. Germany didn't even have enough settlers to properly resettle her eastern territories lost after WW1, which were partially ethnically cleansed by Poland, let alone the vast territories of the USSR. Operation Barbarossa was a preemptive strike against the bolshevik threat not an invasion to gain territory.
What the hell are you even talking about?
Who talked about 'resettling', let alone during a war? Fact is, the Germans wanted to starve the inhabitants of the USSR and brutalized them - as well as Soviet POWs.
OK, you're retarded.
What seems to be confusing you?
I think we agree, but let me say:
The treatment of POWs isn't what the thread was about. Not even starvation of Europe. The thread is about a fat drunk named Winston Churchill.
I'm aware. Just giving an example of where they were blatantly lying about that Daryl fellow.