1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't disagree with that entirely, and perhaps playing too much Souls games over the years has made the frustration of those designs less frustrating. I had more problems with the Swamp area than any of that ridiculously too long rampart zone.

I suppose even the "worst parts" of most Souls games is still pretty average in the overall. Or maybe I've again played too many Souls games and suffered far worse.

16
Adamrises 16 points ago +16 / -0

All 28 full-time employees of the lab were fired.

I'm supposed to believe a scant 28 people were the dividing force between STDs killing everyone and now?

This is obviously just a random research building siphoning money for minimal return on the investment.

2
Adamrises 2 points ago +2 / -0

The new Lords wasn't bad, it was just painfully generic. It didn't do anything overly bad, but it also did very little new to be worth a full price game over a decade after Dark Souls (and all its clones) already did it. The "one free death sends you to the other realm" mechanic was its only true difference and, while good, wasn't game changing enough.

It has nothing that makes it worth playing over just playing Dark Souls again, especially not to the level where the built in randomizers are capable of being fun.

I can respect their minor courting of anti-woke politics and not really backing down on that point regardless. It was clearly a marketing gimmick to re-hype the game up, but its still one step back to normalcy.

8
Adamrises 8 points ago +12 / -4

Usually when people are quoting something they use these nifty little things called quotation marks, to differentiate it for the audience that its not the speaker/writer's own words and thoughts.

This is very handy in letting people know the ignorance of the person who wrote the line isn't your own ignorance and avoiding your point being lost in people mocking you for said ignorance.

8
Adamrises 8 points ago +8 / -0

Most presidential names seem to be in the county/street level instead of the whole state.

I think its a testament to how long we managed to go before presidents started being deified and treated as these godlike figures equivalent to royalty that we didn't end up doing so. Even if Reagan/Clinton/Obama changed that trend to leave us where we are now.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

A specific situation that is so common that it doesn't require an entire crafted backstory for it to happen, niggers are just like that completely on their own.

It is funny you think "asking for evidence" is somehow an offensive stance to take, and you consider that the non-useful contribution to this conversation.

Yet somehow "this has never happened before, omg" is totally incredibly helpful. Including announcing you are leaving the conversation like you are important or anyone cares about your specific attendance.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've seen some of Reacher season 3 since the wife enjoys it for obvious reasons. A good little action show otherwise ruined by a "strong, no nonsense" woman character who is basically getting everyone in more trouble or killed because she feels rescuing some girl is more important than everything else.

Otherwise I've only even heard of 4, 2 of those just in passing "hey I recognize the title."

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

60-70% of black children grow up in fatherless homes. And that's probably only the ones where he is completely and utterly gone instead of just being mostly out.

So imagine an entire culture raised by and taught everything about the world exclusively by women, of course you'd end up with violent, self-victimizing neanderthals. That's literally what women are.

Heck, a lot of the problems with black culture can be traced back to "PUA level" discussions about what women like in a man, but to them its natural because they never had other men to teach them to be more than dancing monkeys for women's whims.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was this a black school?

It was just the South. Where blacks exist everywhere. Meaning we have regular interactions with them to have experience in how they act and what they do. That's why its relevant.

Then there's no sense trying to understand anything.

I'd like to think knowledge is its own reward, such as knowing the narrative of what happened that day. Why the news media and social media do what they do is irrelevant to that.

It's unique

And I'm saying its not, and you are putting in a lot of effort to try and act like we don't live in a country where this is a common occurrence. Even the "media approved" narrative being obviously bullshit is literally what happens everytime and why we have memes like "dindu nuffin" and "jogger" to begin with.

If you haven't been paying attention ever, it might seem unique. But this is no different than any of the other viral nigger crime stories.

14
Adamrises 14 points ago +15 / -1

...and /to/ their own. that's what makes this unusual.

God I wish. Anywhere with blacks around this isn't uncommon. Their very existence is danger upon all around. I literally had to be told about areas of both my town and school that if I went there, nobody would care about what happened to me because I was asking for it.

Can you guess what made those areas special? I'll give you a hint, everyone there blended in at night.

which is why it's in the news?

Random events go viral all the time. Floyd was just a random nigger that died among many that year, and every year prior. A kid I went to school with was killed by his mom's black drug dealer, and he was an elementary schooler. It barely even made the local news despite being similarly tragic.

Again, the point isn't that its an unreasonable assumption. It was just a question about if it was anything more than just an assumption. Treating "a black kid had a knife and killed a white one" as something super special and unique that it needs a backstory to understand is giving negros too much credit about being civilized.

15
Adamrises 15 points ago +17 / -2

the most reasonable explanation for this unusual situation.

No, its a reasonable assumption. Which is why the original guy was asking for anything to turn it from that into reality instead of just a narrative. Just so that we can repeat it going forward without as much hesitation on its reliability.

There is nothing "unusual" about a nigger being armed and chimping out, they do that regularly on their own with no logic to be understood behind it. Its a general trait of theirs independent of anything happening around it.

We didn't need any form of backstory to understand what happened, because of how not-unusual it is. All of us just easily understood that nigs gonna nig. So the assigning of details like this is nice to have some confirmation rather than just making up our own stories unnecessarily.

22
Adamrises 22 points ago +23 / -1

There's no innocence, but picking one narrative over another usually requires something grounded.

Its a jogger, bringing a knife to school and stabbing someone over something incredibly stupid and nonsensical is equally believable. I know because I went to high school with them and it was always on the table daily.

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

You right, I completely blended those two movies into the same thing in my head and just didn't even double check when I went look it up.

Genuinely do not understand why they exist. PoP was an already dead IP, and AssCreed was over the hill. And neither had marketing worth anything to even pretend they were trying.

27
Adamrises 27 points ago +27 / -0

If blacks as a group were capable of thinking of anything beyond my "family" (gang, blood and then other blacks in that rough order) they'd not be even half as bad off.

Its literally beyond most of them to ever consider themselves anything but the victim in all situations, that whitey might not have deserved something bad happening, and that they might need to let one of their own go out of a sense of principle/morality or even practical self interest.

Its why trying to "Save" the black community is such a worthless endeavor. Most of them are too far gone to every be anything but laborers without a thought given to their cares or opinions, and that's the better option over just simply being rid of them like you would a feral invasive species in any other land, breeding and destroying everything.

'Cept you Matt, we cool.

6
Adamrises 6 points ago +6 / -0

He refuses to accept the idea that even one of the lowliest privates could have had motivations for fighting other than preserving slavery

Which is funny, because its literally on every record that the leader of the Confederacy, Robert E. Lee, only joined for loyalty and love of his land instead of any true care about slavery. A man who could have had everything in life, signed it away for his passion.

You'd think the kind of Leftist who parrot these kind of points would understand the idea of "I fucking hate my government and what they support does not represent me, but I also hate these other groups even more."

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

Reign of Fire is a movie that showed that in a world ending apocalypse, the first things the British do is build a castle, adapt to living in fear and hide to try to wait out a fucking dragon invasion that spans the globe.

Its not until a psychotic American shows up sitting on a tank that they even try to fight back whatsoever, and he has to teach them how fucking technology works (they use helicopters and radar instead of the Brits using a fucking falcon and a telescope) as well as basic biology like "if you shoot things they die."

And just like real life, only after almost all the Americans get killed trying to save them that the Brits grow enough of a spine to fight back and then act like they are the heroes for weathering the storm.

Great movie, but the political joke there is almost hilariously on point.

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

Winter Soldier is probably one of the best movies of the MCU, if not the best, and its criminally underrated by Whedon slop surrounding it.

2
Adamrises 2 points ago +2 / -0

At least that was a forgettable* film released well after its peak, I can almost forgive people not remembering it.

The DMC anime was packaged with the most highly anticipated game of the time, coming hot off the heels of the biggest hit they had, and basically any "fans" would have had to have owned it at some point unless they are literal tourists who jumped in at 5.

*So forgettable that I didn't even know Fassbender was in it, only Jake Gyllenhaal because of the few posters I saw marketing it. I literally went check if there was a second even more forgettable movie after you said that.

14
Adamrises 14 points ago +14 / -0

Literally every hit piece that have is either such a laughably bad try that his supporters meme it back on them immediately (TWO SCOOPS!) or something that just makes him seem more powerful and based than he really is to anyone but their own side.

by XBX_X
8
Adamrises 8 points ago +8 / -0

His pro-Jew stance controversy was him while he was already on the downward spiral. He blew himself up with drugs, his thot daughter, and vaxxs.

Him being incredibly pro-Zionist is almost his attempt to reclaim that lost popularity once he got "clean" of all that nonsense. But that stuff destroyed him and any power/authority he had completely independently of liking Jew cock.

1
Adamrises 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, I didn't see it there, my fault for skimming the now multiple topics about this. Either way, I can guarantee most of the people on the "pro-netflix version" side have not seen it.

11
Adamrises 11 points ago +11 / -0

What I think is extremely funny is how few people in this entire debate even remembers that DMC literally already had an anime adaptation, it was even packaged with DMC4 back in the day and was the intro of numerous characters that would get confirmed canon in 5 a decade later.

So you don't even need to compare it to the games, giving them an easy out of "different mediums." There is a full 12 episode anime already in existence that adapts a chunk of time between two games with all of these characters in it and did it pretty well and accurate enough (sans Dante debateably).

7
Adamrises 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think its very funny that both faces of the Pro vs Anti-Jew sides in America are both losing their relevance and reputations due to failing to pivot correctly around Trump and his hurricane force.

Fuentes and Benji deserve each other in irrelevance.

4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can only imagine this is a reaction to r/AsianMasculinity (is it still around? Haven't heard about it in forever) being one of the early proto-TRP subs that was full of wrong think, incels, and just general non-progressive ideas.

But because it was entirely non-whites saying it they couldn't do a thing about it for a long time.

So this type of bluepilled, cuck sub was likely made to be the foil to it and its politics/ideologies.

by XBX_X
4
Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

If he had any reputation left he wouldn't have turned to the Daily Wire in the first place.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›