8
AccountWasFree 8 points ago +8 / -0

I find this such a hypocritical topic for most people, that are so eager to decry AI tech, while never really considering the industrialised nature of the world around them. Literally all of the arguments they are making have been made decades before most of them were ever born, from the theft of design, to the destruction of jobs, to even the "validity" of something created by a machine.

It just feels weird to me that people will complain about this and not think of the wider implication or consistencies such a stance would and should entail. As I have said many times before, is this only an issue because industrialisation has finally come for the white collar (overwhelmingly liberal) jobs, or are we actually going down the Dr Theodore Kaczynski thesis route? Because I don't have that much of a problem with the latter, but the former just feels like bitching about [CURRENT THING] with a bipartisan twist.

10
AccountWasFree 10 points ago +10 / -0

Tradesmen are relatively safe because you still need hands to do their job.

They weren't when industrialisation came around. Artisans are practically wiped out bar a niche services. The past 100 years saw to that. Most tradesmen are a hollow of what they once represented.

10
AccountWasFree 10 points ago +10 / -0

I mean. Dying at sixty isn't unheard of. It's the fact he was as healthy as he was that throws some doubt on this.

And I think that's part of the problem. We just don't know anymore. Because yeah, it's possible that he died naturally. It is possible. It's also possible that the vax caused it, and that doubt can't be lifted because the powers that be have lost ALL credibility.

3
AccountWasFree 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a good start, but it will never come to the west considering how many here believe themselves above such tasks thanks to the excess of luxury and convenience that keep them utterly complacent in their day to day lives.

by folx
10
AccountWasFree 10 points ago +10 / -0

Oh boy, are we going down the "who's in more danger" comparison? Gee, I wonder who's in more danger when troons are around children.

1
AccountWasFree 1 point ago +2 / -1

Doesn't really annoy me. If you're dumb enough to buy it, you deserve to lose your money, especially if it's to neo-cons, controlled opposition, or establishment hacks.

Plenty of other options out there besides Hershey's and DW.

8
AccountWasFree 8 points ago +8 / -0

Remember when bar owners would just tell you to fuck off? Pretty fucking depressing just how weak modern life is.

8
AccountWasFree 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's already known within America alone. There's a reason why Appalachia isn't the crime capital despite being the poorest region of the nation.

As others have already said though, biggest factor is fatherlessness. The destabilisation of the family unit is intentional.

2
AccountWasFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hard to really call them "new"fags when some have been around for around a decade. It's just that 4chan today doesn't live up to the reputation it earned in the early 2000s. It went downhill, but because they maintained their offensive aesthetic, very few really noticed just how basic bitch the site really is.

A thin veneer doesn't really change what's inside.

Though one could also argue that it's being gentrified a lot slower than the rest of the internet, so it's a combination of boiling the frog slower and a case of relativity as they fail to notice the decline of 4chan because everywhere else is declining much faster.

4
AccountWasFree 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's 4chan. The whole thing has been a shitshow of leftist trash for years (yes, natsoc is still socialism and still leftist), overwhelmingly made up of tryhards that flock to 4chan because of the reputation that was only earned 15+ years ago when they themselves weren't on the site.

So if not trolls, they're definitely still poser trash riding on the coat-tails of yesteryear, just like 99% of 4chan these days.

8
AccountWasFree 8 points ago +8 / -0

As it should be.

10
AccountWasFree 10 points ago +10 / -0

As per usual, any disagreement a troon faces is tantamount to wanting them dead, and anything vitriol they openly throw out on a regular basis is just "I disagree with you uWu".

How does the saying go? The left think their violent actions are speech and the speech of their enemies is violent action.

1
AccountWasFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

anyone who says "oh we don't need to archive, these guys are good" is retarded

Good thing I never said that, eh Don Quixote?

1
AccountWasFree 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's why there's been a whitelist and greylist of sites that doesn't or does require archiving over on halfKiA.

If it was purely about preservation, there'd simply be a bot in the chat that automatically archived all links (like they used to have years ago for the chat comments), not just those that are socjus aligned. Almost like it was about preventing sites like Kotaku and Polygon from getting clicks.

Preservation was and is important, so don't get me wrong as this isn't a black and white binary situation. There can be more than one reason, and it's not mutually exclusive from one another.

1
AccountWasFree 1 point ago +2 / -1

Depends on where it is. Most of the time in KiA, archiving has been used to deny clicks while providing a reliable proof that isn't simply an image that could be faked.

Preservation is also an important element, but I find it's secondary in certain circles.

6
AccountWasFree 6 points ago +6 / -0

This shit has been known for a while. Still, it's good to see the research continually reinforced with the same results each time.

But most parents don't want to be parents. And frankly, society at large don't want parents to be parents. They'd rather you fob all that responsibility onto other entities, namely the state with curated social media on the side to help reinforce the group think that gets encouraged.

14
AccountWasFree 14 points ago +14 / -0

The damage being done to confidence in public health institutions & public health officials will probably never be repaired.

DO YA FUCKING PROMISE!?

4
AccountWasFree 4 points ago +4 / -0

Remember, No Means No, except when a woman doesn't want it to mean no. This includes when a woman wants you to read her mind and go further than her saying no, this includes when you have boundaries, and as shown in this video right here it includes when the woman isn't even involved at all.

by folx
8
AccountWasFree 8 points ago +8 / -0

Obviously electro-shock therapy for mental illnesses wasn't a good idea. But surely this cannot be the only alternative. Because if this IS the only alternative, I earnestly suggest we go back to electro-shock therapy for mental illnesses.

11
AccountWasFree 11 points ago +11 / -0

He's assmad because he was clocked for constantly conceding inch after inch after inch. That's why he's now resorted to a "no u" screed about how everyone here is actually the real enemy.

Retard talks about division and then goes and tries to be the most divisive cunt here by continually letting leftists walk all over him.

11
AccountWasFree 11 points ago +12 / -1

bLoCkEd

Go back to Twitter where you belong.

10
AccountWasFree 10 points ago +11 / -1

My dude, my strategy WAS your strategy. For YEARS I preached that it wasn't that bad, that it was just little things, and I have changed after it failed for all that time.

Most people here have been where you are right now.

You want to know why miles have been taken from the Right? It's because our team is saddled with people like you.

You are not on my team, neo-con cunt.

18
AccountWasFree 18 points ago +19 / -1

And there are actually people that wonder why the Overton Window shifts ever-more to the left, when you have people who will continually excuse the inches that are pushed and pushed and pushed, and then wonder why you're a mile from where you started.

We need to move the ball back towards non-woke and you have to do that one step at a time.

You don't do that by conceding inches. That's how miles are taken away from you.

16
AccountWasFree 16 points ago +16 / -0

This is honestly one of my favourite webcomic about this trend.

Because that's the problem with noticing this crap: most of it is small and tiny and relatively tiny. But it's not just one thing. It's not just one instance. It's always been a pattern. Yeah, the toilet sign isn't that big of a deal. But it's a clear trend that shows a pattern of behaviour by the people who made it.

It's never just been one thing. It has always been a continued pattern.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›