Perhaps Oswald shot at JFK, but how did he get down those stairs so fast (after wiping all his fingerprints off the rifle and stashing it away) and not even be breathing hard? Standing by a payphone as if awaiting a call?
EDIT: He was first seen drinking a coke in the cafeteria, a cop ran in and found him standing beside a payphone, later one presumes.
2 witnesses (both Black) said Oswald was talking to a man in a trench coat when the police rolled up on them, and that the trench coat man ran off after the shooting. They didn't actually see the shot, iirc.
I know he punched the first officer in the face, but don't recall him being armed (he'd dropped 'his pistol' at the policeman's shooting). Might be mistaken on that.
EDIT: He dropped the 4 shell casings from his revolver, and left substantial other evidence behind at the scene as well. He did have the pistol in the theater, but didn't shoot anyone there.
The whole JFK fiasco will likely never be resolved, since they re-classified all the evidence for another 50 (iirc) years.
It's Catgirl Flammenwerfer Time!
Ok, she's a foxgirl (a character from Eve Online?) but close enough. My comment with this link got removed from reddit before, lolz! She's such a cutie.
I'll toss "Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep" into the ring once again! The book that Bladerunner is based on.
-short
-packed with stuff!
-comparing it to the movie is fun
PK Dick was a great writer, although some of his works are... difficult to understand :/ Bladerunner is pretty straightforward though. They're usually well worth the effort.
Thanks, it's so different here! And my cat-brain is so limited :o
Oh wait! It's essentially the same, only with extra steps involved, no wonder I got confused. Just [ ] and then ( ) and presto! Link Appears!
One single Nazi flag, flown by masked men who were clearly agents, once.
I've found 2 images of them and a 3 second "video clip" and that's it. Why only 3 seconds? Because that's how long it took for the people nearby to haul it down, we can see a man turning to do just that after the 2 second mark :>
Never in any news broadcast does any Nazi imagery appear, not once.
Possibly the very last time Huff-Po published anything remotely conservative! Was that before Arianna sold it off?
Anyhow, it came to pass exactly as predicted. He's been a tyrant from day one, just like his father: either Fidel (biological) or Pierre (adoptive) was.
It was pepper spray cannisters, often fired directly into the bodies of peaceful protestors... totally different! (not)
[enter text]Remember This Guy?(https://i.cbc.ca/1.4419483.1511575424!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_620/sergeant-pepper-ubc-apec-conference.jpg)
The far-leftists were in horror at their rights being ignored (by a Liberal, again!) the video was even more disturbing. The only CBC show that covered it was... This Hour Has 22 Minutes. They broke several major news stories the rest of Canada's Media tried hard to ignore... eventually the CBC bosses ordered them to stop reporting news on a comedy show :p
I used the link button, and got that :/ .win is just weird!
They did the same thing here in Manitoba: The Government used to publish the official numbers of new cases every day for 2 weeks years. They noted how many were "unvaxxed" and how many had 1-3 Jabs.
When Omicron broke out around the end of December? There were around 1400 new cases daily. They reported it, I did the math: 84.3% of all new cases had 1-3 Jabs. 84.7% of Manitobans had 1-3 Jabs at the time. The Jabs did absolutely nothing at all to prevent people catching the Covid-19.84.
A week later they stopped publishing that data, changing their web page to report only those in hospital and ICU.
In my Province (Manitoba, eh?) the % of people catching new cases of Omicron who had 1-3 Jabs was exactly the same as the % who DID have 1-3 Jabs.
84.3% of new cases had 1-3 Jabs, and 84.7% of Manitobans (at that time) had 1-3 Jabs. Out of 1,300 new cases every day back then.
This was on the Official Government Covid Information page. Shortly after this they removed that information, and replaced it with bogus "in hospital" and "in ICU" data.
50% of the "in hospital covid cases" are in there for something else. They only found out they "had covid" after being tested upon admission. 20% for ICU patients (presumably went directly to ICU) too.
The government has lied to us since day zero, it comes as no surprise they continue to double-down on their double-down :<
I recall being lectured by a leftist (who should be smarter than that, but is willfully blind to various facts, outright rejecting them no matter what the proof is) that ALL of Portland's arsons were "in one square block" and nothing more. This was based on a single 'article' stating that with an image of flames in a small square block.
This was actually culled from a report on a 3-night (iirc) series of riots in that neighborhood. That report was about only that neighborhood. Dozens of fires in a very small area. A quick look at the Official Portland Fire Department's arson page shows fires all over the downtown, and surrounding areas being hit as well.
He didn't believe me :/ He still thinks Travyon Martin was 'just buying candy' and Michael Brown was 'just walking down the street' too...
But... but... "parts of downtown Ottawa are paralyzed..." = call in the army! National Emergency!!
Nevermind that crime in the "occupied area" dropped to nearly zero. Nevermind that the streets have never been cleaner since the truckers pick up every speck of trash every single night (unless physically blocked by police). Nevermind that you can just walk in or out of the "occupied area" freely, and get some free food just for asking. I guess the local restaurants hate that, BUT they were likely closed or restricted by mandates anyhow, so...
No more posting links? Ok.
LGBT Facts Video it's just so funny! 😂
Edit: Maybe someone can explain how to put links in the titles :/ Same as links in comments?
Yes, that's how low things have gotten here. In Canada the Liberals used taxpayer money to "bail out" the News Media they agree with: with some strict rules about what is and is not "news". Decided by (guess who!) the Liberal Party.
Got a 3 day Reddit ban for arguing against people supporting the idea of that show being about sex with children. :o Oh well.