Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

66
()
posted 5 years ago by TheImpossible1 5 years ago by TheImpossible1 +66 / -0
92 comments share
92 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (92)
sorted by:
▲ 40 ▼
– RoulerBleu 40 points 5 years ago +40 / -0

How is blanket rejection of evidence of consent by the prosecutor not reflectively understood as an absurd violation of the rights of someone accused?

Let's not kid ourselves, this will negatively impact men 99% of the time. And unless the feminazis manage to make this policy in court too, not just at the prosecutor level, the only result will be to increase the % of not-guilty verdicts. Because prosecutors will have to proceed with cases they know are meritless.

The feminist kangoroo "courts" in the USA universities that are currently getting sued all over the place by male victims of false rape accusations works like that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– BandageBandolier 19 points 5 years ago +19 / -0

I like how the justification for making it even more like an actual witch hunt was simply "we're convicting less people of rape, obviously something's wrong with the courts".

Like the idea of rape being actually down isn't something that even needs considering.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ActualAdult 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

How is blanket rejection of evidence of consent by the prosecutor not reflectively understood as an absurd violation

Sexting is not consent. Sexting is a digital exchange of risque messages. That is not consent to sex. Do not fuck a woman just because she sent you a risque message.

If it helps, consider it this way: I interpret receipt of a dick pic to be permission to castrate the imbecile that sent it to me. If your interpretation of sexting being consent because that's how the recipient views it, then you must also agree that my interpretation gives me carte blanche to castrate any man that sends me a dick pic.

So this guidance is in fact not rejecting evidence of consent. There may or may not be sexts. There may or may not be consent. The two are entirely orthogonal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RoulerBleu 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Prosecutor reviewing evidence, text messages saying :

He : "Oh God I want meatballs so bad."

She : "Yeah meatballs would be nice, I want your meatballs in my mouth."

He : My place?

She : Sure.

Police complaint :

She : "He forcefully fed me, I never talked about wanting to eat with him!"

He : "She came to my place and we had dinner. Here are text messages leading up to that."

Sex itself isn't a crime. Castrating someone is.

Of course it's in the realm of possibility that she changed her mind before dinner and he actualy forcefully shoved meatballs in her mouth. It's also possible she lied because the meatballs weren't up to her expectations, or she regreted cheating on her diet, or felt shame about eating meatballs as she has Vegan friends, etc.

And extremely unlikely such a case would be entertained by a judge with circumstancial evidence, the texts messages, showing there was intent for consensual dinner.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ActualAdult 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Sex itself isn't a crime. Castrating someone is.

Rape is a crime. Sexting is not consent. Sex without consent is rape.

It absolutely is indeed in the realm of possibility that she is willing to flirt electronically but has no intention of getting sticky. Which is all that this guidance points out.

I'm confused that it's causing such distress.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– ActualAdult 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

First off: Stop accusing people you don't know online of worshipping paedophilia. It makes me feel I'm responding to a 12 year old.

I am responding though because even 12 year olds need to understand that sexting is not consent. Do not fuck anybody without their consent. Do not pretend that cybersex is consent for physical interactions. Do not be stupid. Do not rape.

Also do not be stupid enough to believe that text messages sent prior to meeting someone and having sex with them will save you from a false rape accusation. They won't. Protect yourself better than that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Comment Removed: Rule 16

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– kratomlol 24 points 5 years ago +24 / -0

this is supposed to be a censorship free forum. You're exactly why we started visiting .win

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I think I'm being reasonable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– PatrikStar24 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

I find it rather suspicious that you only now within the last week started enforcing these rules (which at first glance, makes it look like you made it up on the spot) when he and several other posters have posts just like this going back many many months no issue, because it was part of a wider discussion that frankly needs to be had. If we aren't allowed to talk about it because the subject has a pussy, what was the point of making a KIA2 Win in the first place if you enforce reddit's bullshit regardless?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– send_it 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0

Reddit jannies can quit Reddit, but not the Reddit attitude.

Remember when AOV decided to deepthroat the halfkia mods and chose to sacrifice the new place to his delusions of coming together by forcibly outsourcing any discussion on modding, leadership etc. to kiameta? Remember when Dom decided that pointing out the skin color of a perpetrator was doubleplusungood when it was a black on white crime?

Remember when the writing was on the wall for literal MONTHS and they wasted like two months stroking eachother off instead of just creating kia.win only to have it "snatched away at the last moment" by the faggots over on halfkia and we were once again forced to play number 2?

These people can't help themself. They just HAVE to be worthless little sandpit tyrants.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

I made up all the rules on the spot months ago. If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.

The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women. The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy. You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'. That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.

Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers. There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 13 ▼
– Adamrises 13 points 5 years ago +13 / -0

The fact that you are enforcing this now, and not the 100s of other times across his posts over the months that this discussion happens just like this, is pathetic Dom.

Absolute failure.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I feel like I've been consistent, but it's entirely possible I missed things.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 4 ▼
– ShadistIsACuck 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Fuck off jannie

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Lots of stuff, why?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy