I made up all the rules on the spot months ago. If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.
The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women. The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy. You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'. That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.
Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers. There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.
If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.
I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.
The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women.
Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.
The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.
You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? (Edit2: slight correction) Or how about an essay titled "The Future - If There Is One- Is Female" which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?
You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'.
That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.
That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.
So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation.
Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers.
See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds. There is a reason why women in ancient times embraced their conquerors after they had got done killing all their men.
There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.
Tell that to the feminists.
EDIT: And for a final point that caused me to flee from KIA1 in the first place. Feminists, BLM, and Antifa are all part of the same rotting left wing, and they all occupy Academia, Media (all media, not just video games as we would find out), Hollywood, and an entire US political party. They have declared ideological war on all that don't fall lockstep with their ever changing doctrine, a war that as of last month (Portland, OR shooting) has turned hot. The mod team of KIA1 refused/ignored/hid from this inevitable conclusion, and it cost them their sub.
anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? A book which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding?
I'm sorry to be a pedantic asshole, but you've mixed up two different radfem manifestos.
The SCUM Manifesto declared the objective of clandestine sabotage until their power reached critical mass and artificial sperm was available. This would be the catalyst for the extermination of men. Valerie herself stated it was not satirical, despite constant claims by feminist allies.
The 10/90 plan is from "The Future - if there is one - is Female.", the essay that gave the feminist movement their slogan. It declares that to protect the environment and humanity's future, the male population must be reduced to 10% of the levels at the time, which is actually far lower than 10% of the levels now. This 10% would live in a ghetto-like community far away from the women and solely be used to produce sperm.
Ninja edit: I actually welcome well needed corrections like this. Being submerged in how left wing politics operate for long periods of time as I have means that a few things are mixed up with eachother just on account of how batshit insane the individuals involved are.
I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.
Well, I don't have an auto-mod, and it's basically just me, so I have to rely on reports. If people weren't reporting it, and I didn't see it, then I missed it.
Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.
Do you really believe that women, as a gender, are collectively guilty of conspiring to murder and enslave men. I think I'm setting a fairly low bar here.
The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy.
You mean as the Radical Femenists ... have done so publicly and gleefully
Yes.
Just because Feminists are morons, it doesn't mean you have to be a moron.
That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.
How is it inconsistent. Saying you oppose the right of women to vote could be constructed in a way that doesn't identify women as conspiracist murderers?
There is a reason why women in ancient times embraced their conquerors after they had got done killing all their men.
They were raped concubines you god damned lunatic!
I made up all the rules on the spot months ago. If you think I didn't enforce them, it's likely because I missed them.
The issue is not about the subject about you having a problem with women. The issue is about declaring an entire gender to be your enemy. You'll notice I haven't done anything about 'should women be allowed to vote'. That's still an ideological frame work to go off of.
Women as an enemy demographic conspiring to murder all men is pretty fucking bonkers. There has to be a line somewhere for the sake of basic decorum.
I ask again, for months on end until this very week? I just don't buy that for a second.
Surely you of all people should know by now that pointing out a harsh truth about a "protected" demographic does not mean one hates it.
You mean as the Radical Femenists (who, by this point, are the mainstream, no longer a fringe) have done so publicly and gleefully w/o punishment by anybody going as far back as 1967 with the publishing of the SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas? (Edit2: slight correction) Or how about an essay titled "The Future - If There Is One- Is Female" which advocates genociding 90% of all men on Earth, leaving the surviving 10% as slaves for the sole purpose of breeding? Or how about the various Kill All Men hashtags that have trended to varying degrees by these same feminists going back to 2014 without a single removal by the platform?
That just makes your moderation inconsistent. Either allow all discussion or none at all.
So you say, yet look at where we are today. No idea as to what triggers a response or what doesn't from moderation.
See above. The proof is there, and while it isn't all women advocating the teachings of the SCUM Manifesto, most women will definitely look the other way while radicals carry out their dastardly deeds. There is a reason why women in ancient times embraced their conquerors after they had got done killing all their men.
Tell that to the feminists.
EDIT: And for a final point that caused me to flee from KIA1 in the first place. Feminists, BLM, and Antifa are all part of the same rotting left wing, and they all occupy Academia, Media (all media, not just video games as we would find out), Hollywood, and an entire US political party. They have declared ideological war on all that don't fall lockstep with their ever changing doctrine, a war that as of last month (Portland, OR shooting) has turned hot. The mod team of KIA1 refused/ignored/hid from this inevitable conclusion, and it cost them their sub.
I'm sorry to be a pedantic asshole, but you've mixed up two different radfem manifestos.
The SCUM Manifesto declared the objective of clandestine sabotage until their power reached critical mass and artificial sperm was available. This would be the catalyst for the extermination of men. Valerie herself stated it was not satirical, despite constant claims by feminist allies.
The 10/90 plan is from "The Future - if there is one - is Female.", the essay that gave the feminist movement their slogan. It declares that to protect the environment and humanity's future, the male population must be reduced to 10% of the levels at the time, which is actually far lower than 10% of the levels now. This 10% would live in a ghetto-like community far away from the women and solely be used to produce sperm.
Thank you for the correction.
Ninja edit: I actually welcome well needed corrections like this. Being submerged in how left wing politics operate for long periods of time as I have means that a few things are mixed up with eachother just on account of how batshit insane the individuals involved are.
Well, I don't have an auto-mod, and it's basically just me, so I have to rely on reports. If people weren't reporting it, and I didn't see it, then I missed it.
Do you really believe that women, as a gender, are collectively guilty of conspiring to murder and enslave men. I think I'm setting a fairly low bar here.
Yes.
Just because Feminists are morons, it doesn't mean you have to be a moron.
How is it inconsistent. Saying you oppose the right of women to vote could be constructed in a way that doesn't identify women as conspiracist murderers?
They were raped concubines you god damned lunatic!
There aren't any here for me to tell.
I don't disagree with any of that.