All the while pushing the line of how important it is to highlight the trans nature of said person, despite completely ignoring their own designed 'transphobia' in those ideas..
For example, if trans men are women [I might have that the wrong way around, re: transmen, since the concept is inherently stupid anyway], then why do they keep going on about them being transmen/deadnaming or whatever rather than just stating them as women?
Rhetorical question, we know the answer is so they can harp/larp on about things while never actually moving forward with their own "progressive" ideas.
As an aside, yes some do try and just state they are women, except it's always the ones that can't pass doing so.
They don't exist. They're a biological impossibility without serious, lifespan-halving levels of drugs, and even then their joints are structured to facilitate passing a human skill, not for power.
Doesn't work, they just get cancelled for stepping off the plantation/not providing pronouns/not saying 'orange man bad' not being woke enough like Gina Carano.
Does she mean the peace deals that her Daddy Trump negotiated in Israel's favor? Is that the chaos she means? Those peace treaties makes is a lot harder for Hamas to get funding, start another interfada and get his boney ass called up to serve her countries defense so she can make movies.
The villain is Maxwell Lord, played by Pedro Pascal, someone who can mind control people.
In the comics WW literally snaps his neck on live tv after Lord flat out tells her he will never stop trying to do whatever it is he is doing and that it is the only way to actually stop him. So she does. As you can expect, a bit of backlash occurs over one of the Trinity having done this with such widespread viewership.
Also, how does it "reflect the chaos currently happening around the world" when this movie was already well into production when the dumpster fire that is 2020 began. Lest we forget this movie was originally supposed to debut in June-July.
Do they never once consider their hyperbole a contributing factor?
I swear that should be a square in “modern day movie review bingo”
Since it's called Wonder Woman 1984 I would hope it reflects the sort of chaos that occurred in the mid eighties.
Dunno, this sure feels like 1984....
I love Bit Torrent.
begins humming Lazy Town's A Pirate Is Free
I have not paid for music or movies once in my entire adult life.
This is news?
I hope I live to see the day they cast an actual, legitimately strong woman for one of these roles.
But I doubt it.
AustinPowers.gif
At this rate they literally will start casting trannies before they start casting strong women.
All the while pushing the line of how important it is to highlight the trans nature of said person, despite completely ignoring their own designed 'transphobia' in those ideas..
For example, if trans men are women [I might have that the wrong way around, re: transmen, since the concept is inherently stupid anyway], then why do they keep going on about them being transmen/deadnaming or whatever rather than just stating them as women?
Rhetorical question, we know the answer is so they can harp/larp on about things while never actually moving forward with their own "progressive" ideas.
As an aside, yes some do try and just state they are women, except it's always the ones that can't pass doing so.
They don't exist. They're a biological impossibility without serious, lifespan-halving levels of drugs, and even then their joints are structured to facilitate passing a human skill, not for power.
They very much exist. They're simply nowhere near as strong as strong men.
Average men. They're nowhere near as strong as average men.
Doesn't work, they just get cancelled for
stepping off the plantation/not providing pronouns/not saying 'orange man bad'not being woke enough like Gina Carano.Post a link or an archive of the actual article, not just a screenshot of a partial quote.
If you read the quote, it's completely harmless. She thinks the world is currently chaotic. That's it. Don't read more into it than she says.
The director injects her political opinion and some jackass from Collider injects his, but Gal Gadot did not.
Does she mean the peace deals that her Daddy Trump negotiated in Israel's favor? Is that the chaos she means? Those peace treaties makes is a lot harder for Hamas to get funding, start another interfada and get his boney ass called up to serve her countries defense so she can make movies.
You realize there's another possibility as to what she's lamenting
Quite frankly, there's nothing so 1984 as "contact tracing", "vaccination passports", a ban on social gatherings...
I'd have to actually hear her thoughts on the matter to make a judgement call. Can't do that from a screenshot.
The lack of quality dick in her various holes?
The villain is Maxwell Lord, played by Pedro Pascal, someone who can mind control people.
In the comics WW literally snaps his neck on live tv after Lord flat out tells her he will never stop trying to do whatever it is he is doing and that it is the only way to actually stop him. So she does. As you can expect, a bit of backlash occurs over one of the Trinity having done this with such widespread viewership.
AWWALT
All Wonder Women Are Lesbian Terrorists?
why should I listen to a Zionist
Please let me enjoy this Gal. I really enjoyed the first one and I still have an ounce of respect for you that I hope you don't spoil...
Also, how does it "reflect the chaos currently happening around the world" when this movie was already well into production when the dumpster fire that is 2020 began. Lest we forget this movie was originally supposed to debut in June-July.