All the while pushing the line of how important it is to highlight the trans nature of said person, despite completely ignoring their own designed 'transphobia' in those ideas..
For example, if trans men are women [I might have that the wrong way around, re: transmen, since the concept is inherently stupid anyway], then why do they keep going on about them being transmen/deadnaming or whatever rather than just stating them as women?
Rhetorical question, we know the answer is so they can harp/larp on about things while never actually moving forward with their own "progressive" ideas.
As an aside, yes some do try and just state they are women, except it's always the ones that can't pass doing so.
All the while pushing the line of how important it is to highlight the trans nature of said person, despite completely ignoring their own designed 'transphobia' in those ideas..
For example, if trans men are women [I might have that the wrong way around, re: transmen, since the concept is inherently stupid anyway], then why do they keep going on about them being transmen/deadnaming or whatever rather than just stating them as women?
Rhetorical question, we know the answer is so they can harp/larp on about things while never actually moving forward with their own "progressive" ideas.
As an aside, yes some do try and just state they are women, except it's always the ones that can't pass doing so.