All the while pushing the line of how important it is to highlight the trans nature of said person, despite completely ignoring their own designed 'transphobia' in those ideas..
For example, if trans men are women [I might have that the wrong way around, re: transmen, since the concept is inherently stupid anyway], then why do they keep going on about them being transmen/deadnaming or whatever rather than just stating them as women?
Rhetorical question, we know the answer is so they can harp/larp on about things while never actually moving forward with their own "progressive" ideas.
As an aside, yes some do try and just state they are women, except it's always the ones that can't pass doing so.
They don't exist. They're a biological impossibility without serious, lifespan-halving levels of drugs, and even then their joints are structured to facilitate passing a human skill, not for power.
At this rate they literally will start casting trannies before they start casting strong women.
All the while pushing the line of how important it is to highlight the trans nature of said person, despite completely ignoring their own designed 'transphobia' in those ideas..
For example, if trans men are women [I might have that the wrong way around, re: transmen, since the concept is inherently stupid anyway], then why do they keep going on about them being transmen/deadnaming or whatever rather than just stating them as women?
Rhetorical question, we know the answer is so they can harp/larp on about things while never actually moving forward with their own "progressive" ideas.
As an aside, yes some do try and just state they are women, except it's always the ones that can't pass doing so.
They don't exist. They're a biological impossibility without serious, lifespan-halving levels of drugs, and even then their joints are structured to facilitate passing a human skill, not for power.
They very much exist. They're simply nowhere near as strong as strong men.
Average men. They're nowhere near as strong as average men.