First people aren't going to agree with me on my assessment of Jews. That's fine. You hate them, I don't. That has nothing to do with the assessment of Nazis. If Nazis targeted only people who were "too asian" they as an ideology would not change from my perspective.
There's this idea that the nazis were good because they were targeting Jews and Jews = degeneracy and therefore the cause of the nazis were good and anti-degeneracy.
Things pointed to are that a lot of the books being burned were degenerate and many of those books were written by Jews. Yes that's a historical fact.
This doesn't make a prove racial characteristic, only it proves that Jews typically are where power is, but tons of the Jews in the concentration camps were not powerful. And a lot of the degeneracy pushers such as in Weimar were not Jewish either, but were German. The point is where power, and decadence is, degeneracy follows. Few would disagree with that.
Here's a big problem with the trying to wonder if the nazis were actually good that the young right in the post-truth age wrestle with.
First of all, nazis, socialists, russians, communists, these are all European political systems. We, in America had a completely different overton window and thank goodness for that. While Europe was trying to figure out what flavor of socialism to implement, America was enjoying a level of freedom, including in speech, and especially in religion that essentially no European country could fathom. So to try to tie nazism to Americanism and borrow it is foolish. We already were operating on a superior level than all those brands of socialism.
If you want to know what nazi Germany would look like in the modern day or any day, just look at Germany from the fall of Nazi germany to today.
Germans have not changed one bit in authoritarianism. Did they drop nazism in favor of freedom after the fall of the Nazi regime? Nope, they hopped immediately into the GDR the German Democratic Republic that lasted until the 90s. The GDR hardly differed at all from Nazi Germany in terms of a government being who you feared rather than a government fearing its people. In fact, it was so close in behavior that I was confused when I was shown a film portraying the GDR in school growing up, having to be explained that this was not WW2. Everyone telling the Stasi about neighbors and teachers and everything else, I could see no difference from the Gestapo as the Gestapo were alwas portrayed.
Then you'd think, after that falls, Germany would FINALLY be ready for freedom, right?
Well rank the free-est nations in Europe and tell me where you put Germany. Germany, if you post memes or criticize Islam, the police get sent to your door just like in the UK.
If you want to know what Germany would be like if they continued on with Nazism, well I've got good news for you; you already know what it looks like. The only thing that got dropped from Germany's government was concentration camps. In all other ways Germany looks the same as Nazi Germany ever since.
But here's the other real issue I have with "maybe the Nazi's were the good guys"; and it has to do with the post truth thing.
If it were to come about, that we made being a woke leftist utterly unpalpable. That, rightfully so, they look at the transgender movement and abortion promotion as the abomination it is, and those people get expelled from the society, in 100 years, you'd have other post truth people trying to re-evaluate the woke people, sitting from a place not like the place where we sit, where we know EXACTLY how awful they are and playing armchair historian and philosopher and they too will go "well maybe the woke people weren't that bad" and if we could time travel into the future we'd slap them across the face and go, moron, yes, yes they were, you're just going to have to take our word for it.
Just because communists are as bad as the nazis doesn't make the nazis good. It just makes European politics an example of why Europe is a total craphole. It's why in America, the 1980s was seen as a time of optimizim and patriotism, yet ask any Eastern bloc nation what the 1980s was like for them and they'll explain that it was a time of alcoholism and despair.
America is not Europe and nazism is just another example of the numerous examples of the hopelessness that Europe has always been further down the drain than America, and that's because America was a fresh start from Europe. A blank slate. A chance to not have to share in Europe's rot.
To want Nazism over what America had in the 1930s-1950s is to say "I wish America was set back 100 years and was a shared partaker in Europe's desperately bleak systems"
To look at modern day America and conclude it's a piece of crap is absolutely rational. It's also absolutely rational to want it to be different. No sane man wants America to be like it is today. The answer isn't wishing the Nazis won. It's wishing that the Marxism that was still being promoted from places like Soviet countries weren't allowed to take root and fester in America.
1940s/1950s America was and will always be 100 times better than modern America and 100 times better than Nazi Germany as well as every totalitarian version of Germany we've seen to this day. Why would we look to a tricycle as the model (Socialism via Nazi Germany) when we have a Porsche as the model (1940s/1950s America and earlier).
I'm glad you started off with this so I didn't have to read the rest... but I did anyway just to be fair to you for typing this.
Nazis weren't good. I agree with you. For one, they lost and we shouldn't venerate losers. Second of all, they were socialists. FULL STOP. Many of their social policies would have made modern leftists blush with excitement. Socialism, even the National Socialist kind is terrible.
National Socialism is not what modern society needs. It's a peasant political system designed by peasants for peasants that some elites coopted for their own gains, similar to International Communism, its sister ideology.
The NatSocs got a lot of things right though and they were clearly more concerned with the well-being of the Germans than any International Communist ideology (which typically served jewish interests). This is where a lot of the positive sentiment comes from. At least NatSocs promoted a centralized authoritarian socialist society with the interests of White peasants at heart, more-or-less, which cannot be said for any of the Jewish-Leftism (communism) we've seen since.
We need something for modernity that isn't nostalgic for a bunch of losers. Personally, I call myself a National Capitalist who believes in a strong nationalistic ethnostate run by the Imperium (a dictatorship) with a decentralized governing style (not high centralized authority to dictate everything people ought to be doing but giving power back to the people and ensuring an extremely strong policing/military force run by the Imperium to ensure justice despite decentralized powers) and limited (night-watch, aka 5% taxes maximum) government. The more power the people have, the better. If one is concerned about their own people having power, perhaps they should reevaluate who "their" people are exactly.
The modern veneration of the Nazis isn't good when taken literally as venerating the Nazis but when it's done to show the truth about jews, that is useful. Jews are without a doubt, the biggest parasitic race around and the root of many problems in modernity.
See I'm of the opinion that we should hate both jews and nazis. Jews because they're a hateful false religion of ethinc supremacists and nazis because they're a bunch of socialist faggots and socialism comes from jews
Prove to me that Jews are uniquely evil without needing a pre-supposition that Jews are evil.
For instance, the statement by leftists that white men are evil is justified by believing that white men are evil.
And then because there's enough white men in powerful positions, they can use that to justify their beliefs ignoring why white men are in those positions, and also ignoring that a white CEO is rarely representative of white people in general. White CEOs are orders of magnitude more woke and compliant with globalism than the average white person who lives in a suburb.
Now I don't think people could prove that Jews are evil by pointing to average Jews. They must point to powerful Jews in order to make their case.
And yet when I want to make the case that the black community is a serious problem in America; I don't need to ever cite a single powerful mouthpiece for black people not even once. I never need to cite MSNBC, Don Lemon, Al Sharpton, NAACP, BLM leaders or anyone who has even an iota of power.
All of those are completely irrelevent when I have tens of thousands of examples of observable behaviors of the average. I could just say "type in black people twitter" right now and you'll be spoiled for choice. You have to actively suppress looking at black behavior in order to ignore it.
You have to actively look for Jewish people and academics and things like ADL in order to justify conclusions about Jews.
If you can't draw a conclusion by looking at the average person, than you can't draw a conclusion.
The reason I can say that white people aren't stereotypable, is because show me the average white person. You can't. That's why black comedians can easily lampoon themselves but have to reach for narratives to mock white people because the averages show us that white people are not easily classifiable into stereotypes. Typically to mock white people, you have to choose a hyper specific type of white person, like rednecks, as white people are more of a jack of all trades type of people.
Why do I bring this up?
Because I've never seen the assessment of Jews be made except by the position of power examples. They never use the neurotic guy in Brooklyn who works in a tailor store. They use the spokesman for the ADL, or the academic in Harvard who's true religion is leftism, not Judaism.
Again, if you can't make the case by looking at the general average, you don't have a case. It's why we can make conclusions about India.
Because all you need to do with India is go on Google street view and look for a clean place in India. So the averages tell us the truth.
What is the average Jew? Well the average Jew isn't powerful, that's for one thing. Other than that, I'd like to know what the average Jew is like because I'm never told. I'm shown cherry picked things and told this means all Jews are like this. If this were done for powerful white people you'd conclude that white people are leftists, but it would be a poor way to approach a people group, an unreliable sample pool.
It took me nearly 5+ years of significant research to come to my conclusions, along with a lot of real-world experience and my own analytical competency. I have bookshelves full of books I've read, tons of studies I've read online (that I didn't document), etc...
I can't just post a few paragraphs and convince you nor do I have any intention of trying. We're long past the point of discourse. If I wanted to make a difference, I'd just start killing rich jews, I wouldn't try to convince you of anything. If you can't understand the answer to your question, then you should start looking harder. Once you see it though, you'll never be able to unsee it. You aren't trying hard enough.
Edit - I will point you in the right direction. Genetics. It's all about genetics. Talmud? Downstream of genetics. Study genetics... What is good and evil? Good is realizing your purpose. A vacuum cleaner does good when it vacuums and if you oppressed a vacuum from vacuuming, you'd be evil from its perspective. Two people can be good from two perspectives and yet evil from another perspective. The genetics of jews cause predispositions toward behaviors that are the antithesis to the purpose of White men and therefore, jews are evil based on the outcome of their behaviors relative to White men. Are jews evil relative to themselves? Not at all; but I'm a White man and from my perspective that makes jews evil because their programming is such that they oppress me from realizing my purpose without any active thought from a jew to do so because it's their programming. A baby allegator knows how to do a death roll without being taught. A beaver knows how to build a dam without being taught. The idea that your environment creates your behaviors is FALSE. It's 70% genetics and 30% adaptation to environment given your genetics. This is why jews are only a problem when they have wealth/power because without it, their genetics and thus actions without explicit thought as governed by their biology has no impact on White people but when they're in positions of wealth/power they do their death rolls and build dams (metaphorically speaking) as they are programmed to do which oppresses White people from achieving White people's purpose in life and thus from White people's perspective, the jews are evil.
Understand genetics and what people's biological drive truly is and you'll understand good and evil. Study outcomes of people's actions in groups, which you may need a mastery of statistics to accomplish, and you will start to see how jews are evil from the perspective of White men.
That's the best I can leave you with.
Can you name a few of those books? Because you've sounded pretty kooky to me from the beginning, with all those comments about how you want your country to be conquered and occupied.
This wasn't a good faith question.
What's your opinion of Jewish supremacists?
The same opinion I have of black supermacists. I don't like them. What's your point?
So your argument is that since jews aren't as bombastic as niggers or jeets, they're not a problem? No shit we focus on the jews who are in positions of power and influence, because that's where they do all their damage from.
Have you ever read what's in the talmud?
Ah yes, that completely average Jew that is the scattered rabbis over a few hundred years, and then of the contemporary rabbis, there's splits over whether they even preach it, and if those choose to, there's debate over what parts they preach or don't.
There's Jewish rabbis who choose to only preach what was in the Torah aka the original 5 books of the Bible.
Others use the Old Testament. Others use the Talmud as well and of those some preach in a way to promote Jewish supremacy and it's more vile things to justify beliefs.
Again, if the Quaran were what we measured Muslims by, very little people would have critiques about Muslims despite the fact the Quaran is awful.
It is the behavior of Muslims that people have an issue with. The terrorism and everything else, and unlike Jews, the averages, the numbers play out in a way that is not in the muslims favors.
You can see a lot of average aka non powerful muslims who are highly impacted by the Quaran by their actions.
The average Jew, aka not the globalists or the Jeffery Epsteins of the world, it's hard to see much to any demonstration to an allegience to the Talmud.
The Talmud is like the the writings of the church fathers. Catholics pick and choose especially depending on the individual catholic. A "progressive" catholic like the pope will pick church father writings that seem "nice" while ignoring any that seem harsh.
Same goes with Jews relationship with the Talmud, and even then, whereas Catholics have it as dogma that church fathers are on equal footing with scripture, Judaism doesn't have that dogma in regards to the Talmud. The Talmud's legitimacy in regards to the old testament according to their religion is debated and fractured all over the place.
Umm, no we don't.
Shalom!
Because their culture is downstream of the Talmud. You may as well say that we don't live in Christian societies because most people don't go to church, even though our every institution, our morality, and the actions taken as reasonable by ordinary people are all fundamentally Christian.
I must challenge one of your assertions here.
Muslims are evil because of their beliefs. Not the other way around.
Individuals who profess evil beliefs, but have yet to act upon them, are by definition unsuitable for a civilized society.
This applies equally to all of the non Christian religions, as Christianity IS civilization.
I will leave it to God to sort them out. I don't need any pre-supposition since I have eyes, ears, and a brain. They have destroyed my country intentionally, so I will not give any special consideration to a single one of them. They all go.