I'm content to watch from a distance to see if it works first, yes. What other people do with their children is their business and on their conscious and soul.
But what about all the risks of other diseases that they haven't told you about? And is it really worth starting down this slippery slope for a promise of security?
Exactly. It's a slippery slope from abortion in some cases to abortion of diseased babies to picking an embryo and aborting the rest. All of it is bad and it was only in the last few generations that any of these became acceptable in countries with ethical standards.
No, it's not. Birthing a baby with severe genetic defects that either ends up dying shortly after being born or becoming a helpless human suffering for all of its life is not something desirable.
So the only two alternatives are embrace everything science has to offer, not asking whether it's good for us, or else abandon all technology? I don't see why there can't be a middle ground where we just reject technologies that when taken to their logical conclusion lead to dystopia.
So the only two alternatives are embrace everything science has to offer, not asking whether it's good for us, or else abandon all technology?
You haven’t asked anything, you made up doomsday scenarios in your head that could literally be done for electricity. It’s the equivalent of abandoning AC after it was used to electrocute an elephant.
I don't see why there can't be a middle ground where we just reject technologies that when taken to their logical conclusion lead to dystopia.
You’ve put zero logic forward, doomsday hypotheticals are not logical conclusions. The logical conclusion of humanity is dystopia, that’s even in the Bible.
I mean heck, If I could guarantee that my son would not be at risk to the cancers and heart problems that run in my family, I'd take it.
Just 14 gene splices to flatten the curve!
Obviously I wouldn't be an early adopter.
You're just content for other humans to be sacrificed first so your children can have less risk?
Why not?
I'm content to watch from a distance to see if it works first, yes. What other people do with their children is their business and on their conscious and soul.
Which ones? A thousand illegals for the future of one White American child? Fair to me.
lmao downvote harder cucks. you're not convincing anyone
But what about all the risks of other diseases that they haven't told you about? And is it really worth starting down this slippery slope for a promise of security?
They’ve been screening for and aborting (or atleast pressuring the mother to) Down’s syndrome babies for like 30+ years now.
Exactly. It's a slippery slope from abortion in some cases to abortion of diseased babies to picking an embryo and aborting the rest. All of it is bad and it was only in the last few generations that any of these became acceptable in countries with ethical standards.
No, it's not. Birthing a baby with severe genetic defects that either ends up dying shortly after being born or becoming a helpless human suffering for all of its life is not something desirable.
That’s a non argument. By your logic we should abandon all technology…
That is what he want. The US to abandon technology, so his people can more easily dominate us.
Spoken like a true postmodernist
So the only two alternatives are embrace everything science has to offer, not asking whether it's good for us, or else abandon all technology? I don't see why there can't be a middle ground where we just reject technologies that when taken to their logical conclusion lead to dystopia.
You haven’t asked anything, you made up doomsday scenarios in your head that could literally be done for electricity. It’s the equivalent of abandoning AC after it was used to electrocute an elephant.
You’ve put zero logic forward, doomsday hypotheticals are not logical conclusions. The logical conclusion of humanity is dystopia, that’s even in the Bible.