I remember growing up my mom made such a big deal about laundry. I thought laundry was the hardest thing in the whole world because of how my mom acted about it. When I finally moved out on my own and learned how to do laundry, I have an eye-roll moment at my mom making it into such a big deal.
Reminds me of women who make a big deal about leaving one empty can out on the counter. If you were an alien and saw how big a deal she had made it into, you'd think empty cans could explode like a nuclear bomb if not put into the recycle.
Women are experts at making mountains out of molehills.
Feminism is collective bargaining. If women can successfullyframe a few basic chores as a full-time job, then no one will try to assign them any real labor.
I don't remember where I saw this, but it was some video about women complaining that they do everything.
In the video, this woman was explaining that men put the laundry in the washing machine/dryer, press the buttons that they want, and that's it. They consider the total labor to be about 5-10 minutes. This is accurate, because most of the work is being done by the machine.
After, the woman explained that women don't just count putting the laundry in the machine, they count the total time it takes for the laundry to be done as labor that they are doing. This is completely irrational, as the machine is doing the work, not them, but they don't see it this way. Same thing with dishwashers. Things that have to be handwashed notwithstanding, the dishwashing machine is the one doing the majority of the work, but they count the time that takes as "their" labor.
This is why women can, with a straight face, tell you that they do more work than you at home than you do on a construction site, because they count time that machines do work as time that they do work. It's absurd to any man who is not a soyboy, because the man would instantly point out that the machine is using energy to do work, not the woman.
It's an irrational lie that they tell themselves in order to feel like they are better than men. Same thing with emotional labor. Not a real thing, and if anything, they cause men emotional labor because men have to deal with their irrational childish outbursts all the time.
The more I learn about and gain experience with women, the more I'm convinced that Freud was onto something. They are basically children in adult bodies.
Have you ever heard the expression that women can't exist unless through the validation of others? The idea being that women can't imagine themselves except as through the lens of another hence why they constantly seek attention and validation because it's through this process that women exist.
The reason I'm bringing this up is because I wonder if there's a connection.
A man can put in the laundry, press start, then for 50 minutes he exists without any connection to the machine that's cleaning the laundry.
On the other hand, a woman can't exist without the validation of another. So, for a woman, when she puts in the laundry she ceases to exist for the next 50 minutes so instead she imagines herself still tied to the laundry machine instead which has formed a connection for her to validate her existing for the next 50 minutes. Her view of "doing the laundry" for 50 minutes is because she exists for this whole 50 minutes and women can only exist when something other than themselves validates her existence. In this case, it's the laundry machine going. For 50 minutes she's existing through the validation of the laundry machine and thus for the full 50 minutes in her mind, she is doing work. She cannot separate the fact she isn't doing work for the 50 minutes because then she would cease to exist and a woman only thinks she isn't working when she isn't existing. This is why women love to always be working despite complaining about the work because if they ceased working, then they wouldn't exist but they face a double-edged sword in the sense that working sucks but also, then they wouldn't exist if they stopped working. Women thus form connections to work even when the machine is doing all the work because the machine operating validates her existence and her existence means she's working otherwise, she'd have to cease to exist to not be working.
Hmm, I may have just cracked the code. On TheImp1's ban date too. What an achievement for men everywhere!
I do think that women don't really try to exist on their own, but I don't think it's related to this. I think it's them rationalizing away how they don't actually work as hard as men on average, and that it enables them to have an excuse for it. That's why this whole "unpaid labor" thing is so big, because men as a whole have noticed that women on average do subpar labor at work, and don't do it for as long, and they see mothers at home watching daytime goyslop not working while claiming being a mother is the hardest job in the world. It's all just giant amounts of copium.
Laundry is easy when your entire wardrobe is drab cotton and can be done in one load. When you have shit that needs to be separated and set to different cycles, temperatures, etc I suppose it might be more of a hassle.
Maybe, but there's something to be said about laundry being a woman's role, therefore a man ought to be unaccustomed to it. Knowing the appropriate detergent and settings to use for a red silk shirt should be as alien to a man as knowing what engine oil is appropriate in a lawn mower is for a woman. And in our age of flouting thenroles of the sexes, where men and women are eschewing marriage, instead of both men and women becoming jacks of all trades, this knowledge is now alien to most.
No, in this day and age there's 0 reason for a man not to know better about laundry than a woman. A quick AI query and you're already more informed than 99% of women. My detergent is also superior to 99.99% of people's detergent.
Men are superior in anything they do compared to a woman including laundry. It's just, many men don't try to step on women's toes so women can think themselves masters in their own domain but women need to be put back into their place by being shown how inferior to men they are. Laundry? Easy. Women need to get back to basics and focus on their appearance and their submission to men.
Exactly. Men need to always be better than women at all things and never let women think even for a moment that they're better at men at anything because they aren't.
Except all dads are dumb, just like the stormfags so why would I be posting about this? Natalists are the problem and this show is right in pointing that out. Western society will only survive if we kill all the White Nationalists and Natalists!
Three kids? Parasite.
NATALISTS ARE PEDOPHILES. If you have children, you are a PEDOPHILE. Repulsive Nazis and Stormfags.
Literally thought this was an imppost before I looked at the name, well done
It's like he's really here!
They don't think men can cook eggs? Or do laundry?
I remember growing up my mom made such a big deal about laundry. I thought laundry was the hardest thing in the whole world because of how my mom acted about it. When I finally moved out on my own and learned how to do laundry, I have an eye-roll moment at my mom making it into such a big deal.
Reminds me of women who make a big deal about leaving one empty can out on the counter. If you were an alien and saw how big a deal she had made it into, you'd think empty cans could explode like a nuclear bomb if not put into the recycle.
Women are experts at making mountains out of molehills.
Feminism is collective bargaining. If women can successfullyframe a few basic chores as a full-time job, then no one will try to assign them any real labor.
Sweet, man. Is my coffee ready yet?
Especially in this day in age when everything is labeled on the machine and the drums hold a shit ton of clothes.
I don't remember where I saw this, but it was some video about women complaining that they do everything.
In the video, this woman was explaining that men put the laundry in the washing machine/dryer, press the buttons that they want, and that's it. They consider the total labor to be about 5-10 minutes. This is accurate, because most of the work is being done by the machine.
After, the woman explained that women don't just count putting the laundry in the machine, they count the total time it takes for the laundry to be done as labor that they are doing. This is completely irrational, as the machine is doing the work, not them, but they don't see it this way. Same thing with dishwashers. Things that have to be handwashed notwithstanding, the dishwashing machine is the one doing the majority of the work, but they count the time that takes as "their" labor.
This is why women can, with a straight face, tell you that they do more work than you at home than you do on a construction site, because they count time that machines do work as time that they do work. It's absurd to any man who is not a soyboy, because the man would instantly point out that the machine is using energy to do work, not the woman.
It's an irrational lie that they tell themselves in order to feel like they are better than men. Same thing with emotional labor. Not a real thing, and if anything, they cause men emotional labor because men have to deal with their irrational childish outbursts all the time.
The more I learn about and gain experience with women, the more I'm convinced that Freud was onto something. They are basically children in adult bodies.
Interesting. Very interesting.
Have you ever heard the expression that women can't exist unless through the validation of others? The idea being that women can't imagine themselves except as through the lens of another hence why they constantly seek attention and validation because it's through this process that women exist.
The reason I'm bringing this up is because I wonder if there's a connection.
A man can put in the laundry, press start, then for 50 minutes he exists without any connection to the machine that's cleaning the laundry.
On the other hand, a woman can't exist without the validation of another. So, for a woman, when she puts in the laundry she ceases to exist for the next 50 minutes so instead she imagines herself still tied to the laundry machine instead which has formed a connection for her to validate her existing for the next 50 minutes. Her view of "doing the laundry" for 50 minutes is because she exists for this whole 50 minutes and women can only exist when something other than themselves validates her existence. In this case, it's the laundry machine going. For 50 minutes she's existing through the validation of the laundry machine and thus for the full 50 minutes in her mind, she is doing work. She cannot separate the fact she isn't doing work for the 50 minutes because then she would cease to exist and a woman only thinks she isn't working when she isn't existing. This is why women love to always be working despite complaining about the work because if they ceased working, then they wouldn't exist but they face a double-edged sword in the sense that working sucks but also, then they wouldn't exist if they stopped working. Women thus form connections to work even when the machine is doing all the work because the machine operating validates her existence and her existence means she's working otherwise, she'd have to cease to exist to not be working.
Hmm, I may have just cracked the code. On TheImp1's ban date too. What an achievement for men everywhere!
I do think that women don't really try to exist on their own, but I don't think it's related to this. I think it's them rationalizing away how they don't actually work as hard as men on average, and that it enables them to have an excuse for it. That's why this whole "unpaid labor" thing is so big, because men as a whole have noticed that women on average do subpar labor at work, and don't do it for as long, and they see mothers at home watching daytime goyslop not working while claiming being a mother is the hardest job in the world. It's all just giant amounts of copium.
Laundry is easy when your entire wardrobe is drab cotton and can be done in one load. When you have shit that needs to be separated and set to different cycles, temperatures, etc I suppose it might be more of a hassle.
So, women create their own problems by buying difficult clothes and then complain as if it's men's fault.
Maybe, but there's something to be said about laundry being a woman's role, therefore a man ought to be unaccustomed to it. Knowing the appropriate detergent and settings to use for a red silk shirt should be as alien to a man as knowing what engine oil is appropriate in a lawn mower is for a woman. And in our age of flouting thenroles of the sexes, where men and women are eschewing marriage, instead of both men and women becoming jacks of all trades, this knowledge is now alien to most.
No, in this day and age there's 0 reason for a man not to know better about laundry than a woman. A quick AI query and you're already more informed than 99% of women. My detergent is also superior to 99.99% of people's detergent.
Men are superior in anything they do compared to a woman including laundry. It's just, many men don't try to step on women's toes so women can think themselves masters in their own domain but women need to be put back into their place by being shown how inferior to men they are. Laundry? Easy. Women need to get back to basics and focus on their appearance and their submission to men.
Not wanting to hurt women and their feelings is exactly what's lead us to this place.
Women started getting uppity because they ACTUALLY believed that they were better than men at things
Exactly. Men need to always be better than women at all things and never let women think even for a moment that they're better at men at anything because they aren't.
Tasks so difficult only a stronk wahmen could accomplish them.
Cooking is too important to be left in the hands of women.
Except all dads are dumb, just like the stormfags so why would I be posting about this? Natalists are the problem and this show is right in pointing that out. Western society will only survive if we kill all the White Nationalists and Natalists!
You had me in the first half, I won't lie.
Well, it gives me a little hope that comments are roasting the thing...
Anyway, I dutifully downvoted it.
In a plot twist, this guy is not funny on his stand up.