Candace Owens called it
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
A mass shooting, it must be a day that ends in y.
This ain't a 9/11 style attack, and only a jew could claim otherwise.
Remember, anything that Candace claims is probably bullshit, no matter the subject.
Within 24 hours, we had high-profile mass shootings in the US, Australia, and Syria (US soldiers killed in terrorist attack). It feels like more like a bunch of sleeper agents were activated at the same time than a mere coincidence.
It doesnt take much to "activate" a muzzie with a bunch of unarmed people nearby. Usually it just takes a truck
A day or two before hanuka and in the weeks leading up to Christmas. A mystery of timing. Very unlike previous years.
Suspicious timing around Sandy Hook anniversary (December 14th), too.
The profile is only determined by the media. They could make a simple vandalism high profile if they wanted. Or they could sweep it under the rug. It means nothing.
Amd why would they media make a big deal of a vandalism incident? To push an agenda. Why would the local news cover multiple mass shootings in states and countries that are nowhere near where you live? To push an agenda.
Pushing an agenda is not the same thing as seting up a super spy to go preform a random shooting. The claim the Candacers keep making is that Mossad is killing jews to enable the non agression principle. That is simply not nessacary, when all they have to do is wait for an event that has probablity of nearly 1.
They also arrested a bunch of muzzies in Germany who planned an attack on a Christmas market.
After another nation warned Germany it was going to happen.
2 mass shootings, one in Rhode island, one of the most gun restrictive states in the us, and one in Australia, one of the most gun restrictive countries in the world. the one in Australia was definitely targeting jews, no question. the one in the US has still yet to release a motive, but it targeted an economy class in a university with a heavy Jewish population. Both at the start of hanukkah, and I'm willing to bet there were other botched attacks around the world that just got eclipsed in the news by the ones that succeeded.
it seems like there was a targeted worldwide attack against Jews. if this is the case, then it will be very telling who orchestrated it. my money is on the news announcing that it was Islamic terror. if Israel starts using these attacks as an excuse to take military actions in the Middle East again, then my money is on Israel being the original perpetrator.
The shooter in RI getting away is pretty suspect too.
They're not that common.
No, but it is fairly high profile, especially for a place as locked down as Australia. It's not 9/11, but it's not insignificant either.
Disagree. She's right on a fair bit, and wrong on a fair bit. Most of the people calling her out refuse to actually engage with her. Take the Charlie Kirk thing; there's a lot wrong there, and everyone calling her crazy always focus on weird tangents instead of the actual arguments.
Candace is a little crazy, but I'd still take her over most of the people calling her out. Because those people are Tim Pool, James Lindsay, Josh Hammer, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Mark Levin, and a bunch of even less impressive paid propagandists.
If you judge Candace by her enemies, she must be on to something.
That something could very well be a salary as paid opposition since her history for most starts with her attempting her social autopsy dox catalogue and when that failed, where she was contacted by literally LW1 of all people saying to stop, (because it would expose LW1 and others using sockpuppets most likely), suddenly she jumped sides and tried grifting for the Right.
Yeah, I don't think it's a cohencidence that everyone pushing the "Tyler Robinson absolutely, without question, killed Charlie Kirk and anyone who says otherwise is a crazy anti-Semite" line is also a massive Israel-firster.
Not quite everyone, but almost. It's a massively significant amount. People like the ones I mentioned, and also Steven Crowder, Dinesh D'Souza, the Babylon Bee retards, Razorfist, Quartering, and all those types.
The only real Israel-skeptic that is pushing Tyler Robinson, that I can think of is...interestingly, Nick Fuentes. Which leads to some very interesting questions about him.
But, yeah, it's almost all Zionists telling us we can't ask questions about Charlie Kirk. Definitely a pattern.
Blatantly false.
You're right. There are a few random retards who suddenly believe implausible fedslop scattered among them. But I can't think of a single ZioCon that is pushing back against it.
And for the record? Robinson may well have been the lone shooter or at least involved. But is the story we've been told so far credible? Fuck no.
By this standard you should be backing Nick Fuentes far more. He has Chuck Schumer and the entire Democrat party after him.
Judging someone by their enemies is a trap, especialy when media control determines who has a voice in the first place.
And did all of you fuckers already forget that Candace was claiming that an entire sovreign 1st world nation was going to have her assassinated.
Wanna buy a bridge?
Where would he put it? Probably has a half-dozen or so by now.
Plenty of bridges needed in China and India to replace the ones that keep falling down.
Candace's post wasn't correct. But it obviously isn't bullshit either.