Candace Owens called it
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
They're not that common.
No, but it is fairly high profile, especially for a place as locked down as Australia. It's not 9/11, but it's not insignificant either.
Disagree. She's right on a fair bit, and wrong on a fair bit. Most of the people calling her out refuse to actually engage with her. Take the Charlie Kirk thing; there's a lot wrong there, and everyone calling her crazy always focus on weird tangents instead of the actual arguments.
Candace is a little crazy, but I'd still take her over most of the people calling her out. Because those people are Tim Pool, James Lindsay, Josh Hammer, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Mark Levin, and a bunch of even less impressive paid propagandists.
If you judge Candace by her enemies, she must be on to something.
That something could very well be a salary as paid opposition since her history for most starts with her attempting her social autopsy dox catalogue and when that failed, where she was contacted by literally LW1 of all people saying to stop, (because it would expose LW1 and others using sockpuppets most likely), suddenly she jumped sides and tried grifting for the Right.
Yeah, I don't think it's a cohencidence that everyone pushing the "Tyler Robinson absolutely, without question, killed Charlie Kirk and anyone who says otherwise is a crazy anti-Semite" line is also a massive Israel-firster.
Not quite everyone, but almost. It's a massively significant amount. People like the ones I mentioned, and also Steven Crowder, Dinesh D'Souza, the Babylon Bee retards, Razorfist, Quartering, and all those types.
The only real Israel-skeptic that is pushing Tyler Robinson, that I can think of is...interestingly, Nick Fuentes. Which leads to some very interesting questions about him.
But, yeah, it's almost all Zionists telling us we can't ask questions about Charlie Kirk. Definitely a pattern.
Blatantly false.
You're right. There are a few random retards who suddenly believe implausible fedslop scattered among them. But I can't think of a single ZioCon that is pushing back against it.
And for the record? Robinson may well have been the lone shooter or at least involved. But is the story we've been told so far credible? Fuck no.
By this standard you should be backing Nick Fuentes far more. He has Chuck Schumer and the entire Democrat party after him.
Judging someone by their enemies is a trap, especialy when media control determines who has a voice in the first place.
And did all of you fuckers already forget that Candace was claiming that an entire sovreign 1st world nation was going to have her assassinated.