The Pokémon Company's former chief legal officer has said he would not take action
Asking him what he would have done when he was there carries some weight, but the thread headline is wrong. It turned a question to a former employee into a statement of intent from the company.
Unlike Pokémon’s legal department, idiot leftists apparently are unaware of the concept of sovereign immunity and why it would be futile to sue the government.
That means the lawsuits are malicious and disingenuous. That means they can challenged and thrown out. Nintendont has revealed its monopolistic hand and that can now be used against them and rightfully so.
I think it's pretty clearly transformative. The fact the left is crying a river over it proves that it is creating an impact that was not present with the original work.
Asking him what he would have done when he was there carries some weight, but the thread headline is wrong. It turned a question to a former employee into a statement of intent from the company.
Unlike Pokémon’s legal department, idiot leftists apparently are unaware of the concept of sovereign immunity and why it would be futile to sue the government.
especially in a fair use case.
Can't wait for the Palworld/Ultrakill update.
If they did, it could easily be the end of their empire in the US if the government is angry enough.
The last “lawsuit” they tried was bombing Pearl Harbor
They did not enjoy the counterclaim, I’d imagine
We've found the only people Nintendo won't sue!
Regardless, we should be using Palworld anyways.
Palworld let's you catch people.
With guns.
It's a pretty open and shut case of fair use.
Satire that re-contextualizes it
They didnt sue clinton for pokemon go to the polls.
If they did, I'd assume Trump would personally donate to the Palworld legal defense out of spite.
"fans"
still can't believe pokemon is salty they aren't the only Michael Vick simulator anymore...
That means the lawsuits are malicious and disingenuous. That means they can challenged and thrown out. Nintendont has revealed its monopolistic hand and that can now be used against them and rightfully so.
That's not how copyright law works.
I think it's pretty clearly transformative. The fact the left is crying a river over it proves that it is creating an impact that was not present with the original work.